Defend Truth


Courts cannot fix a broken state, solve the vaccine problem


In real life, Professor Balthazar is one of South Africa’s foremost legal minds. He chooses to remain anonymous, so it doesn’t interfere with his daily duties.

Lawfare is truly alive and well in this country. And as is often the case with lawfare, the question is whether courts are the appropriate forum to resolve these disputes.

The Covid-19 pandemic is not unique to South Africa. What is different, however, is the rush to courts to litigate against a range of government interventions. AfriForum and Solidarity, which are habitually enthusiastic litigators, have announced that they intend to launch an application against, inter alia, the government’s decision to control all procurement of vaccines, thereby seeking to shut out the medical aids schemes from acquiring vaccines for members. South African Breweries is also off to court to gain an order setting aside the alcohol ban.

Lawfare is truly alive and well in this country. And as is often the case with lawfare, the question is whether courts are the appropriate forum to resolve these disputes.

In the first place, the executive are entitled to a significant measure of judicial respect regarding choices made to deal with a pandemic that no other country has successfully negotiated. Judges are not omnicompetent and thus are hardly in a sound place to make calls on what is in reality a set of exquisitely difficult policy choices.

Secondly, given that the wheels of the court move so slowly, and that both these cases are likely to be subject to one, if not two appeals to the highest courts, a judicial resolution may be completed only long after the Covid-19 is, hopefully, brought under a significant measure of control. Mootness is a probable outcome.

That there is litigation of this nature is reflective of a deeper problem. The government’s response to Covid-19 has illustrated yet again the disastrous health of the South African State. We have an incapable state in the midst of the worst health crisis for more than a century. And this when we have a Constitution that, by way of s27, imposes a clear obligation on government to progressively realise access to health for all who live in this country.

Agreed that after its ill-fated webinar on a vaccine policy (or, more accurately, the lack thereof) on Sunday 3 January, the government roused itself into some action. But save for the 1.5 million doses of vaccine that will all hopefully arrive by the middle of February, and the Covax facility to cover about 10% of the population, there is no clarity as to when more vaccines will be procured to vaccinate 40 million, as set out in the plan. In his latest speech, President Ramaphosa spoke vaguely of 20 million more doses of vaccine, a statement that hardly complies with the standard required of an accountable, constitutionally compliant government.

If that was not enough to cause despondency, Stephen Sacker of the BBC Hardtalk programme eviscerated Prof Barry Schoub, the head of the government’s vaccine advisory committee, revealing the changing narrative to which South Africans have been subjected, and frankly the gross incompetence since September last year when government began negotiations for a vaccine.

This interview is reinforced by another fact: it appears that until the reaction of civil society to the Health webinar there was no clarity as to how the funding was to be sourced for the purchase of the vaccine.

How is this possible in a country with a supposedly functioning government!?

Was the issue of funding not discussed fully in Cabinet at which both the Ministers of Finance and Health were present?

In short, this failure alone raises questions about the coherence of government.

Leaving aside the procurement of vaccines, the task of ensuring that 40-million can be vaccinated is in itself a monumental task. But again, other than vague generalities, the country is none the wiser about whether there is a coherent distribution plan and the contents thereof. Listening to the President, one was overwhelmed by the repetition of the same speech delivered previously followed by vague promises. This pandemic affects the lives of all South Africans and hence the country deserves candour, accountability and delivery.

Why will the President not subject himself to a comprehensive press conference so that the press can ask the range of questions to which the public want detailed answers? How is this conduct compatible with open and transparent government? The sharp point is that other countries, including developing countries, are far ahead of South Africa in their vaccination programmes. There can be little doubt that for months far too little was done to comply with government’s s27 obligations. This has all taken place in a country with world-class virologists (to which it should be added the very best have been excluded from being part of the government’s advisors due, it seems, to their fierce independence) and a long record of rolling out antiretrovirals to those living with HIV. With a modicum of a capable state, this dire situation should not have occurred.

That brings us back to lawfare. Courts cannot fix a broken state. Litigation cannot produce the level of capability needed for the State to deal with the consequences of Covid-19 which includes a rational, achievable economic recovery plan which seems to have stalled at the announcement stage. The vindication of the promises of the Constitution requires a political solution. Lawfare is not the answer. DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Coen Gous says:

    Where then must citizens/civil organisations/anti corruption forces/etc. go other than the court to fight the injust decisions made by this incompetent and selfish government?

  • Carsten Rasch says:

    Hard hitting analyses, as usual. Thanks for that. The state is uncaring, led by ideology instead of pragmatism. Between the lines, we can read that the “vaccine grab” by wealthy nations -51% vaccine going to 13% of the world – is the spin put on the fact that our gov was not prepared to risk R2B against our health/lives but they will fork out R10B to save a faltering SOE. Thats the essence of it. That fact alone would sink any other government. Then there is the secrecy. What on earth can be secret about acquiring a vaccine? I guess the fact that we don’t have one is worth keeping secret. Finally, there is getting rid of the first outspoken science panel in favor of this clearly more suppliant one, led by a simpering groveller (“I hope my answers were allright”) I see a bad moon rising…

  • Karl Sittlinger says:

    One important question we need to figure out is why the government is insisting on being the only source of vaccine in this country. We know that medical aids, large companies and wealthy individuals would organize their own sources of the vaccine and including the cost, in addition to organizing administration, thereby alleviating pressure on our dysfunctional health care system. And yet still they insist. Some people believe this is the ANCs way of running a proof of concept for their NHI (and lets face it, we can’t put it past them, how well that would work for upcoming elections…).
    Secondly, there is huge resistance from the ANC for full transparency for prices, the money used, where its from, and through whose banks and pockets it flowed. Right now its fair to say that the question is not if there will be large scale corruption for vaccines by ANC cadres, but just when and how much they will steal this time.
    So the question remains, why is the ANC, when people are dying all around, more interested in their hold on power and money, than saving people? Are we missing something else, or are these people really that shallow , greedy and power hungry?

  • Rudd van Deventer says:

    If the distribution of school books is anything to go by…..
    @Pieter Badenhorst, it HAS to be the poles! other options, not knowing what your plan B is are unacceptable.

  • Rob Glenister says:

    If you want the government of SA to listen then the question is whether you have or do not have money. (a) If you don’t have, you burn things. (b) If you do have, you go to court. The government’s response is (a) Ignore and (b) appeal to a higher court.
    Sadly, this excellent article highlights the reality that sits behind the lies that the ANC and our government keep spinning. And until we get rid of them, they will continue to destroy the country for the benefit of a few thieves and fraudsters who sit at the top.
    Ramaphosa has continued to prove his lack of leadership and he is surrounded by people who’s consideration for the people of SA is below zero.

  • Hermann Funk says:

    All comments critisicing government is a useless undertaking if the citizens of this country remain apathetic. Let’s bombard the presidency with thousands of emails every day. If this doesn’t lets take to the streets.

  • R S says:

    The courts may be slow, but the polls are even slower. If we’re lucky we’ll see the ANC drop below 50% in the next national election, even with the govt’s horrible response to Covid-19. Lawfare is the only option for citizens such as myself who see ANC voters trapped in an abusive relationship with their party, and are dragging me and people such as myself into it by voting for them.

  • david everatt says:

    Eviscerated? Hardly. Good interview.

  • Kanu Sukha says:

    A balanced and reflexive take on matters … followed by several no-reflexive and ‘know better than everyone else’ observations/comments.

  • Rod Murphy says:

    It is absolutely insane that the medical aida and large companies like Dischem and Clicks who have vaccination facilities alread throughout Sa are banned from importing vaccine. Somebody in government must be chasing big kickbacks

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

MavericKids vol 3

How can a child learn to read if they don't have a book?

81% of South African children aged 10 can't read for meaning. You can help by pre-ordering a copy of MavericKids.

For every copy sold we will donate a copy to Gift of The Givers for children in need of reading support.