Dailymaverick logo

Maverick News

Maverick News

Trump says US will run Venezuela, South Africa calls on UN Security Council to urgently convene

During a press conference on 3 January, President Donald Trump declared that the US would "run" Venezuela following the overnight capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro. Meanwhile, the South African government has called for an urgent convening of the United Nations Security Council, labelling the US military intervention a "manifest violation" of international law and urging the international community to respond to the crisis.

ukraine-russia-peace-latest US President Donald Trump. (EPA / PRESIDENTIAL PRESS SERVICE / HANDOUT)

The US attacked Venezuela and deposed its long-serving President Nicolas Maduro in an overnight operation on Saturday, President Donald Trump said, in Washington's most direct intervention in Latin America since the 1989 invasion of Panama.

"This was one of the most stunning, effective and powerful displays of American might and competence in American history," Trump said at a press conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida, where he was flanked by senior officials, including Secretary of Defence (War) Pete Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Trump said Maduro was in custody and that American officials would take control of Venezuela.

"We're going to run the country until such time as we can do a safe, proper and judicious transition," he said. "We can't take a chance that someone else takes over Venezuela who doesn't have the interests of Venezuelans in mind."

Potential power vacuum

It is unclear how Trump plans to oversee Venezuela. Despite a dramatic overnight operation that knocked out electricity in part of Caracas and captured Maduro in or near one of his safe houses, US forces have no control over the country itself, and Maduro's government appears to still be in charge.

Trump-Venezuela
Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro (left) and Venezuelan Minister of Defence Vladimir Padrino Lopez during an event in Caracas, Venezuela on 25 November 2025. (Photo: EPA / MIGUEL GUTIERREZ)

The removal of Maduro, who led Venezuela with a heavy hand for more than 12 years, potentially opens a power vacuum in the Latin American country. Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez — Maduro’s presumptive successor — is in Russia, four sources familiar with her movements said, stoking confusion about who is next in line to govern the South American country.

Russia's foreign ministry said the report that Rodriguez is in Russia was "fake."

Trump-Venezuela
Venezuelan citizens cross the Simon Bolivar International Bridge from San Antonio and San Cristobal, Venezuela, into Cucuta and Villa del Rosario, Colombia, 03 January 2026. (Photo: EPA / MARIO CAICEDO)
Trump-Venezuela
Military personnel guard the perimeter of the Miraflores Presidential Palace in Caracas, Venezuela, 03 January 2026, after multiple explosions were reported across the capital. (EPA / MIGUEL GUTIERREZ)

Any serious destabilisation in the nation of 28 million people threatens to hand Trump the type of quagmire that has marked U.S. foreign policy for much of the 21st century, including the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq - which were also premised on regime change.

The US has not made such a direct intervention in its backyard region since the invasion of Panama 37 years ago to depose military leader Manuel Noriega over allegations that he led a drug-running operation. The United States has levelled similar charges against Maduro, accusing him of running a "narco-state" and rigging the 2024 election.

Maduro, a 63-year-old former bus driver handpicked by the dying Hugo Chavez to succeed him in 2013, has denied those claims and said Washington was intent on taking control of his nation's oil reserves, the largest in the world.

SA government calls on UN Security Council to urgently convene

The South African government has called on the United Nations Security Council to convene urgently to address the US military strike on Venezuela.

Pretoria called the attack and the capture of Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores a “manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations, which mandates that all Member States refrain from the use of force against the territorial integrity or independence of any state.

“Furthermore, the Charter does not authorise military intervention in matters that are essentially within the jurisdiction of a sovereign nation,” the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) said in a statement.

Dirco spokesperson Chrispin Phiri told Daily Maverick that SA’s ambassador Liseko Maseko and the rest of the embassy staff in Caracas were safe after the US military strike in the early hours of Saturday. President Trump used his own social media platform Truth Social to announce the military strike and to say Maduro and Flores had been captured and taken to the US.

Trump-Venezuela
Fire at Fuerte Tiuna, Venezuela's largest military complex, is seen from a distance after a series of explosions in Caracas on January 3, 2026. The United States military was behind a series of strikes against the Venezuelan capital Caracas on Saturday, US media reported. The White House and Pentagon have not commented on the explosions and reports of aircraft over the city. US media outlets CBS News and Fox News reported unnamed Trump administration officials confirming that US forces were involved. (Photo: AFP)
Picture of fire at Fuerte Tiuna, Venezuela's largest military complex, after a series of explosions in Caracas on January 3, 2026. Loud explosions, accompanied by sounds resembling aircraft flyovers, were heard in Caracas around 2:00 am (0600 GMT) on January 3, an AFP journalist reported. The explosions come as US President Donald Trump, who has deployed a navy task force to the Caribbean, raised the possibility of ground strikes against Venezuela. (Photo: Luis JAIMES / AFP)

A chorus of criticism

South Africa joined a chorus of states in criticising the US attack.

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said the attack and capture of Maduro had crossed “an unacceptable line.” “Attacking countries, in flagrant violation of international law, is the first step toward a world of violence, chaos, and instability, where the law of the strongest prevails over multilateralism,” Lula wrote on X.

He said the attacks recalled the “worst moments of interference” in Latin American politics, threatening peace across the region. “The international community, through the United Nations, needs to respond vigorously to this episode,” he said.

Neighbouring Colombian President Gustavo Petro posted on the social media platform X that Colombia “rejects the aggression against the sovereignty of Venezuela and of Latin America.” He later announced the deployment of forces to the Venezuelan border.

Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel, in a post on X, accused the US of conducting a “criminal attack” on Venezuela, which he described as “state terrorism” directed not only at Venezuela but at America more broadly.

Chilean President Gabriel Boric Font and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum also condemned the US in posts on X, as did Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei separately posted, in apparent reference to concerns that the US might attack his country, that, “We won’t give in to them… we’ll bring the enemy to its knees.” In 2025, the US bombed Iran’s nuclear facilities. Russia’s foreign ministry also condemned the “act of armed aggression,” reaffirmed Russia’s “solidarity with the Venezuelan people,” and called for dialogue to resolve the crisis. Western countries were markedly less critical of the US.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said his country was not involved in the United States’ strikes on Venezuela and that he wanted to speak with Trump to establish the full facts, adding that the UK believed “we should all uphold international law.”

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaks as he attends a meeting with Vietnam's Communist Party General Secretary To Lam (not pictured) at 10 Downing Street in London, Britain, 29 October 2025. The Vietnamese top party leader is on a three-day official visit to the United Kingdom.  EPA/CHRIS RATCLIFFE / POOL
British Prime Minister Starmer. (Photo: EPA/Chris Ratcliffe)

EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas posted on X: “The EU has repeatedly stated that Mr Maduro lacks legitimacy and has defended a peaceful transition.” But she added that “Under all circumstances, the principles of international law and the UN Charter must be respected. We call for restraint. The safety of EU citizens in the country is our top priority.”

In a statement to AFP news agency, Germany’s foreign ministry said it was “monitoring the situation in Venezuela very closely and following the latest reports with great concern.”

Dirco’s statement also said, “History has repeatedly demonstrated that military invasions against sovereign states yield only instability and deepening crisis. Unlawful, unilateral force of this nature undermines the stability of the international order and the principle of equality among nations. South Africa calls on the UN Security Council, the body mandated to maintain international peace and security, to urgently convene to address this situation.” DM

(Reporting by Reuters bureaux worldwide; Writing by Andrew Cawthorne and Raphael Satter; Editing by William Mallard, William Maclean, Sergio Non, Rod Nickel)

Comments

Mark Benson Jan 4, 2026, 06:54 AM

What the US is doing is deplorable. If you are still under the the illusion that the USA is an overall force for good in this world, go and read up on your history.

Karl Sittlinger Jan 4, 2026, 09:17 AM

part 1: I oppose Trump’s action and the idea that the US can “run” another country. Unilateral regime change sets dangerous precedents and usually ends badly. That said, it is dishonest to frame Maduro as an innocent victim. Venezuela did not collapse because of one night of US aggression. It collapsed after years of authoritarian rule, corruption, hollowed institutions, and elections widely regarded as neither free nor fair.

Karl Sittlinger Jan 4, 2026, 09:18 AM

part 2: Two things can be true at once. Foreign military intervention is wrong, and Maduro was a deeply illegitimate leader who presided over repression and economic ruin. Reducing this to Trump bad therefore Maduro good is analytically lazy. Sovereignty matters, but it should not become a shield that excuses state failure, criminal patronage, or the systematic destruction of democratic accountability.

Karl Sittlinger Jan 4, 2026, 09:19 AM

Part 3: What grates most is South Africa’s moral posturing. A government that has presided over corruption, institutional decay, and near zero accountability at home should be cautious about lecturing others at the UN. The parallels with Venezuela are uncomfortable. Moral authority is not asserted through statements. It is earned through competent, accountable governance. Until then, our outrage rings hollow.

Johan Herholdt Jan 4, 2026, 10:21 AM

Agree!

Ed Rybicki Jan 4, 2026, 09:28 AM

It is quite incredible that, in the 2020s, the USA should join the Putin school of diplomacy and change management. Moreover, that it should not only kidnap a head of state, but then presume to dictate who the successor should be - in the face of two popular choices NOT aligned to Maduro, one of whom received the Nobel Peace Prize for her opposition! Oh, wait: that’s the problem, right there…?

kanu sukha Jan 4, 2026, 11:14 AM

Congrats Ed ... on 'appropriately' (I can't get past DMs new AI censor without it showing me a 'polite' middle finger .. or in Trump's case wagging one at me !) challenging the obfuscation and disinformation contained in part 1. 2. and 3 ... almost reminiscent of The Apprentice episodes.

kanu sukha Jan 4, 2026, 11:20 AM

Expecting the Security Council to 'resolve' anything .. with a few handpicked members having VETO 'rights' ... is like asking Epstein if Trump is/was a 'buddy' of his !