---
title: "Judge blocks Trump administration from canceling COVID-related school aid"
description: "NEW YORK, May 6 (Reuters) - A federal judge in Manhattan blocked the Trump administration on Tuesday from canceling more than $1.1 billion in unspent aid meant to help U.S. elementary and high schools address the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic."
type: "NewsArticle"
publisher: "Daily Maverick"
site: "https://www.dailymaverick.co.za"
section: "Newsdeck"
author: "Reuters"
author_url: "https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/author/reuters/"
canonical_url: "https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2025-05-06-judge-blocks-trump-administration-from-canceling-covid-related-school-aid/"
published: "2025-05-06T21:16:53"
updated: "2025-05-06T21:16:55"
lang: "en-ZA"
word_count: 277
---

# Judge blocks Trump administration from canceling COVID-related school aid

> NEW YORK, May 6 (Reuters) - A federal judge in Manhattan blocked the Trump administration on Tuesday from canceling more than $1.1 billion in unspent aid meant to help U.S. elementary and high schools address the long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

By Reuters · Published 6 May 2025, 23:16 SAST · Updated 6 May 2025, 23:16 SAST

## Key points
- In a dramatic showdown over pandemic relief funds, a federal judge has blocked Education Secretary Linda McMahon from snatching back nearly $190 billion in aid meant to help schools recover, proving that some battles over taxpayer dollars are far from over—even if the pandemic is supposedly behind us.
- U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos issues a preliminary injunction halting Education Secretary Linda McMahon from rescinding pandemic aid during ongoing litigation.
- The lawsuit, initiated by New York AG Letitia James and 14 other states, challenges McMahon's decision to limit aid availability.
- Approximately $190 billion in federal funds is designated for K-12 schools to address pandemic-related challenges, with support extended through March 2026.
- McMahon argues that the funds should be reclaimed as the public health emergency has ended, while plaintiffs assert the need for continued support for schools.

## Content

By Jonathan Stempel

U.S. District Judge Edgardo Ramos' preliminary injunction prevents Education Secretary Linda McMahon from rescinding the aid during the course of the lawsuit.

The [case](https://www.reutersconnect.com/all?search=all%3AL2N3QO17O&linkedFromStory=true) was brought on April 10 by New York Attorney General Letitia James, attorneys general of 14 other states and Washington, D.C., and Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro. All are Democrats.

Washington had authorized about $190 billion of aid to help K-12 schools recover from the pandemic, with funds meant for tutoring students who fell behind, upgrades to school buildings, food for homeless students and other purposes.

The U.S. government under Democratic President Joe Biden had extended the aid's availability through March 2026.

But in a [March 28 letter](https://www.ed.gov/media/document/letter-state-chiefs-esf-funding-march-28-2025-109778.pdf), McMahon, a member of Republican President [Donald Trump's](https://www.reuters.com/world/us/donald-trump/) cabinet, said states had ample time to spend the money, and allowing more time years after the pandemic ended was inconsistent with her department's priorities.

McMahon and the Justice Department argued that taking back the money served the public interest, because taxpayer funds should be used for their intended purpose and the public health emergency from the pandemic had long passed.

The Education Department and Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Trump, who succeeded Biden in January, has slashed federal spending and [vows to dismantle](https://www.reutersconnect.com/all?search=all%3AL1N3Q30WE&linkedFromStory=true) the Education Department.

Other plaintiffs included attorneys general of Arizona, California, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada and Oregon.

The case is New York et al v U.S. Department of Education et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 25-02990.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Howard Goller)