---
title: "Musicians release silent album to protest UK's AI copyright changes"
description: "LONDON, Feb 25 (Reuters) - More than 1,000 musicians, including Kate Bush and Cat Stevens, on Tuesday released a silent album to protest proposed changes to Britain's copyright laws, which could allow tech firms to train artificial intelligence models using their work."
type: "NewsArticle"
publisher: "Daily Maverick"
site: "https://www.dailymaverick.co.za"
section: "Artificial intelligence"
author: "Reuters"
author_url: "https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/author/reuters/"
canonical_url: "https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2025-02-25-musicians-release-silent-album-to-protest-uks-ai-copyright-changes/"
published: "2025-02-25T12:41:31"
updated: "2025-02-25T12:41:33"
lang: "en-ZA"
word_count: 450
---

# Musicians release silent album to protest UK's AI copyright changes

> LONDON, Feb 25 (Reuters) - More than 1,000 musicians, including Kate Bush and Cat Stevens, on Tuesday released a silent album to protest proposed changes to Britain's copyright laws, which could allow tech firms to train artificial intelligence models using their work.

By Reuters · Published 25 February 2025, 14:41 SAST · Updated 25 February 2025, 14:41 SAST

## Key points
- As the UK government flirts with the idea of legalizing music theft under the guise of AI advancement, a chorus of artists from Kate Bush to Elton John warns that this could turn the vibrant soundscape of Britain's creative industries into a silent void, where the only thing echoing back is the sound of cash registers ringing for tech giants.
- Global creative industries are raising alarms over AI models using original works without compensation, sparking legal and ethical debates.
- UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer's push for AI dominance includes proposed copyright law relaxations, allowing AI developers broader access to creators' works.
- Artists, including Elton John and Kate Bush, vehemently oppose the changes, arguing they undermine copyright principles and threaten livelihoods.
- A government spokesperson claims current laws hinder creative potential, but prominent musicians warn that the proposals favor AI companies at the expense of artists.

## Content

Creative industries globally are grappling with the legal and ethical implications of AI models that can produce [their own output](https://www.reutersconnect.com/all?search=all%3AL2N3OM02Z&linkedFromStory=true) after being trained on popular works without necessarily paying the creators of the original content.

Britain, which Prime Minister Keir Starmer wants to become [an AI superpower](https://www.reutersconnect.com/all?search=all%3AL4N3O802B&linkedFromStory=true), has proposed relaxing laws that currently give creators of literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works the right to control the ways their material may be used.

The proposed changes would allow AI developers to train their models on any material to which they have lawful access, and would require creators to proactively opt out to stop their work being used.

The changes have been heavily criticised by many artists, who say it would reverse the principle of copyright law, which grants exclusive control to creators for their work.

"In the music of the future, will our voices go unheard?," said Bush, whose 1985 hit "Running Up That Hill" enjoyed a resurgence in 2022 thanks to Netflix show "Stranger Things".

The co-written album titled "Is This What We Want?" features recordings of empty studios and performance spaces to represent what organisers say is the potential impact on artists' livelihoods should the changes go ahead.

The list of 12 tracks combined creates the sentence: "The British government must not legalise music theft to benefit AI companies".

In a separate letter to The Times on Monday, Andrew Lloyd Webber, Elton John and Paul McCartney also warned about the proposals, saying that the current copyright system "is one of the main reasons why rights holders work in Britain".

Bush, alongside 34 other artists including Dua Lipa, Ed Sheeran and Stephen Fry, signed the letter.

A public consultation on the legal changes closes later on Tuesday.

Responding to the album, a government spokesperson said the current copyright and AI regime was holding back the creative industries, media and AI sector from "realising their full potential."

"We have engaged extensively with these sectors throughout and will continue to do so. No decisions have been taken," the spokesperson said, adding that the government's proposals will be set out in due course.

Annie Lennox, Billy Ocean, Hans Zimmer, Tori Amos and The Clash are among the musicians urging the government to review its plans.

"The government's proposal would hand the life's work of the country's musicians to AI companies, for free, letting those companies exploit musicians’ work to outcompete them," said organiser Ed Newton-Rex, the founder of Fairly Trained, a non-profit that certifies generative AI companies for fairer training data practices.

"The UK can be leaders in AI without throwing our world-leading creative industries under the bus."

(Reporting by Sam Tabahriti, editing by William James, Ed Osmond and Sharon Singleton)