Dailymaverick logo

Newsdeck

This article is more than a year old

Newsdeck

Russia vetoes UN Security Council action on Sudan war

Nov 18 (Reuters) - Russia on Monday vetoed a United Nations Security Council draft resolution that called on Sudan's warring parties to cease hostilities immediately and ensure the delivery of humanitarian aid.
Reuters
United Nations Security Council Meets As World Leaders Gather For The UN General Assembly Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov arrives at a U.N. Security Council meeting during the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on September 20, 2023 in New York City. During the meeting, President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky called on the UNSC to broaden its membership and remove Russia’s veto power on the Security Council. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)

By Daphne Psaledakis and David Brunnstrom

All other countries of the 15-member council, including China, voted in favor of the measure drafted by Britain and Sierra Leone.

Russia was the sole member to vote against, in a move that British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said was "mean, nasty and cynical" and sent a message to the warring parties that they can act with impunity.

The army-aligned Sudanese foreign ministry supported the move.

"The government of Sudan commends the Russian position, which came as an expression of ... respect for the sovereignty of states and international law, and support for the independence and unity of Sudan and its national institutions," it said in a statement.

War erupted in April 2023 from a power struggle between the Sudanese army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces ahead of a planned transition to civilian rule, and triggered the world's largest displacement crisis.

The draft resolution called on the parties to the conflict to "immediately cease hostilities and engage, in good faith, in dialogue to agree steps to de-escalate the conflict with the aim of urgently agreeing a national ceasefire".

It also called on them to engage in dialogue to agree humanitarian pauses and arrangements, ensure the safe passage of civilians and the delivery of adequate humanitarian aid, among other measures.

Russia accused Britain of attempting to meddle in Sudanese affairs.

"We agree with all Security Council colleagues that the conflict in Sudan requires a swift resolution. It is also clear that the only way to achieve this is for the warring parties to agree to a ceasefire," Deputy Russian U.N. Ambassador Dmitry Polyanskiy told the meeting.

He accused backers of the draft resolution of "double standards" when they were giving carte blanche to Israel to continue violations of international humanitarian law in Gaza, and said Lammy's criticism was an "excellent demonstration of British neo-colonialism".

"One country stood in the way of the council speaking with one voice. One country is the blocker. One country is the enemy of peace. This Russian veto is a disgrace, and it shows to the world yet again, Russia's true colors," Lammy told the meeting.

"I ask the Russian representative, in all conscience - sitting there on his phone - how many more Sudanese have to be killed? How many more women have to be raped? How many more children have to go without food before Russia will act?"

The U.N. says more than 25 million people - half of Sudan's population - need aid as famine has taken hold in a displacement camp and more than 11 million people have fled their homes. More than 3 million of those people have left for other countries.

(Reporting by Daphne Psaledakis and David Brunnstrom; Editing by Alistair Bell)

Comments

Loading your account…
Matthew Pantland 19 November 2024 06:19 AM

No different to the US veto of any Palastine related resolution. Tell me again who are the bad guys?

Bob 19 November 2024 06:25 AM

A lot different. This is an internal conflict. Perhaps learn to spell first before offering opinions.

GMJ 19 November 2024 11:02 AM

So; Israel / Gaza / West Bank / Palestine is NOT an "internal conflict", Bob??

Mr. Fair 19 November 2024 11:27 AM

How is Palestine, that became Israel (a racist state for one type of person only) that then treated the native Palestinians like garbage ever since, NOT an internal conflict? 42 vetoes so far from the US when the world voted in favour of resolutions critical of Israel's treatment of locals.

Mr. Fair 19 November 2024 11:29 AM

Perhaps try to not resort immediately to personal insults? We aren't all lucky enough to be born into chosen families, so give us lesser humans a break now and then?

R***0@g***.com 19 November 2024 07:26 AM

Politicians politicking never the right decision for the people of the world. They don't care about the hunger and deaths caused by their terrible decisions. It's just politics!