Dailymaverick logo

Sci-Tech

This article is more than a year old

GUEST ESSAY

Some of my best friends are Trump supporters (and who on earth is Curtis Yarvin?)

What follows is a story about the emergence of a new intellectual force in the US. They are called the New Right (or the Dark Enlightenment or the neo-reactionary movement, NRx, depending on who’s talking).
Some of my best friends are Trump supporters (and who on earth is Curtis Yarvin?) Curtis Yarvin. (Frame grab from the TRIGGERnometry podcast)

Some of my friends support Donald Trump. This is perplexing to me, but true. No, they are not ex-friends. Some are very close to me. Most I admire or respect in one way or another, and it is not as though I avoid getting into debates with them, some of which have devolved into snarling and worse. Mind you, to be clear, many of them dislike Trump the man. They like Trump the tool, the enforcer.

Some readers of this column, I presume, are also pro-Trump. But, in the bubble I live in, both online and IRL, it is a rare thing indeed. I have certain problems with Kamala Harris, but there is a very clear choice here, and I really have tried to see the other side’s logic.

Trump has a long (very long) rap sheet of moral failings (quite apart from his legal rap sheet), which goes back decades. Why would anyone trust the leadership of the free world — with its nuclear codes — to Trump? Harris’ policies, (which I have read) seem to be a relatively safe middle-of-the-road set of policy planks. She’s just your vanilla Democrat, and her rap sheet is very short.

It looks (as of the last few days) as if the scales are starting to tip Trump’s way, so clearly my view of things is not the prevailing one, at least, not in the US. All of this has been confusing to me, until the last week or so when a sudden slew of commentary has elevated one name above the usual suspects, a name previously unknown to most of us.

Curtis Yarvin. Curtis who?

What follows is a story about the emergence of a new intellectual force in the US. They are called the New Right (or the Dark Enlightenment or the neo-reactionary movement, NRx, depending on who’s talking). Many of them are young, educated, fashionable, aware, driven, amiable, and they are predominantly white and male. They live in New York and Washington and Silicon Valley, as well as among their real (or imagined) constituents in working-class towns and cities across the US.

The movement has been funded by tech billionaires, most notably ex-Meta board member Peter Thiel. Vanity Fair covered this phenomenon in a long feature written by James Pogue back in May 2022. It has only strengthened since then, snagging more tech billionaires as friends and backers — Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowitz, Vivek Ramaswamy and, unsurprisingly, Elon Musk. Not to mention intellectuals and “big thinkers” like Walter Kirn and Nick Land, as well as national GOP office-bearers like Blake Masters and Josh Hawley.

And, especially, JD Vance. He is the big prize, but more about him later.

This group is definitely not the deranged, racist, gay-baiting, conspiracy-mongering deplorables of the Left’s imagining. These people are as educated as anyone in the “progressive” movement, especially when it comes to epoch-changing technologies like AI, crypto, energy tech and synthetic biology. Of course, there is a noisy cohort of hangers-on and fans who harbour less than savoury opinions but, hey, some supporters of the Democratic party are equally ill-informed, intolerant and gullible.

And then there is the movement’s philosopher king, Curtis Yarvin.

Yarvin is 51. He grew up in a traditional East Coast liberal family and has a background as a software developer in Silicon Valley and, more recently, as a blogger. He succeeded wildly at the latter, writing a series of right-wing rants in a blog called Unqualified Reservations (between 2007 and 2014), and then later publishing a more carefully articulated set of opinions on his Substack page Gray Mirror. As his arguments and positions have matured, his influence has not only spread wide, but deep, capturing the enthusiasm of both the intellectual New Right elite and the more populist leaders of the conservative working class.

So, what does Yarvin have to say? Here are some quotes:

“Democracy is a failed and dying form of governance.”

“The masses are too stupid for self-rule.”

Or this —

“If democracy is so decrepit and ineffective, one might ask how it is that America became the world’s great superpower and maintained that position for the last century. My answer contains two parts: first, that nothing lasts forever. Second, while American supremacy may once have rested on innovation and growth, the country, now a bloated empire, has been surviving for decades on the power of myth-making and mass illusions.”

I have read through some of his posts and blogs. He is wonkish, quoting history and precedent, often constructing dense, articulate and well-reasoned arguments to support his position.

He is not your typical right-winger or GOP flagbearer. In the US, right-wing positions are often described in terms of their cultural and social compasses — anti-abortion, the primacy of religion, resistance to minorities, women’s rights and identity protections, etc. Others are economic in nature (high tariffs, lower taxes, less business regulation).

Yarvin is not really interested in any of these. The entire edifice of his philosophy is governance. How to structure a society. He thinks democracy has failed. He believes that the US should be a patchwork of techno-monarchies, run by CEOs, authoritarian in nature, with no namby-pamby, one-person, one-vote in sight. He thinks the US government has been enslaved by what he calls “the Cathedral” — a collaboration between the media, political elites and other special interests. He advocates overthrowing the Cathedral, for the sake of his dream of a reinvigorated US.

All of this would be an interesting fringe position, except that his adherents are rich, influential and smart. Most importantly, they are inflamed and have started wearing the cloak of true zealotry.

Which brings us back to JD Vance, who could well become US president sometime in the next four years, if Trump wins and is subsequently led offstage at some point during his tenure, mumbling and rambling and cognitively impaired.

Peter Thiel (with his billions) knows this. He hand-picked Vance, making him rich as a partner in his VC company and then paying his way into politics. Vance has a parasitic loyalty to Thiel; he is the perfect Manchurian Candidate. The New Right seeks a new order, and Trump will be irrelevant the moment he is elected. Vance is their true Trojan horse.

None of them have the balls to say what they believe out loud, for fear of committing societal and political suicide. Except for Curtis Yarvin. He yells it from the rooftops — Democracy has failed, and corporate techno-autocracy is the future, the US’s great new shining city on the hill.

To most of us, Yarvin’s world may sound like lunacy. But, given the power and wealth and influence he has accreted around him, we ignore it at our peril. It is not that great a leap from Trump to Yarvin. DM  

Steven Boykey Sidley is a professor of practice at JBS, University of Johannesburg. His new book It’s Mine: How the Crypto Industry is Redefining Ownership is published by Maverick451 in SA and Legend Times Group in the UK/EU. It’s available now.

Comments

Rob Fisher Oct 28, 2024, 06:54 AM

Yup. The moment Trump has won the election. Or failing that, stolen it with a violent insurrection. Then the next shooter will hit the target and JD Vance will be in. That way the GOP gets good publicity from a Trump who is no longer a liability. That is a truly scary prospect for USA and us.

Malcolm McManus Oct 28, 2024, 08:08 AM

The only violent insurrection I can see would come from the democrats. Listen to their daily divisive rants. But don't write off Harris just yet. US elections can be unpredictable. I do like the idea of Vance as a future president. USA needs reform urgently and it wont only take 4 years to repair

Lawrence Sisitka Oct 28, 2024, 08:51 AM

I really can't believe that anyone with more than one bran cell can see any value in Vance (or Trump of course) at all. We may have evolved technologically, but our minds are still neanderthal - may the Goddess protect us from such rubbish!

Malcolm McManus Oct 28, 2024, 09:37 AM

Lawrence, we all have our opinions. I am not going to berate your IQ or intelligence. I have noticed that supporters of Harris, Harris and Biden themselves, and democrats tend to do this a lot. I don't understand this behavior.

Richard Kennard Oct 28, 2024, 09:02 AM

The insurrection comment..is that one of deflection because Jan 6 is there for all to see. It appears that an oligarchy is what you aspire to? I'd also say that Trump is now and has always been THE divisive figure in US politics.

Malcolm McManus Oct 28, 2024, 10:17 AM

Pro rata, You often have more violence at an Antifa rally than Jan 6th.

Richard Kennard Oct 28, 2024, 10:25 AM

As a matter of interest..do you condone the Jan 6 insurrection and second question was Antifa the instigator?

Rodney Weidemann Oct 28, 2024, 11:07 AM

You do understand the difference between a protest and an insurrection, I presume? Being angry about police brutality and state condoned murder is something entirely different to trying to overthrow the legally elected government of your country...

Malcolm McManus Oct 28, 2024, 11:12 AM

Its a comparison. The point being, that although labelled as a significant insurrection, it was hardly a defining moment for USA. Of course I condone it from a bunch of rednecks, but I condone the current similarly aimed rhetoric from the left. Its daft both sides of the coin.

Richard Kennard Oct 28, 2024, 02:17 PM

Hardly a defining moment? It was momentous and it can only be construed that its those who don't have issue with it are prepared to undermine both democracy & the constitution.

megapode Oct 28, 2024, 11:51 AM

There is a precedent for violent insurrection. It happened when Trump claimed an election had been stolen from him, and it wasn't the Democrats that invaded the white house. The temperature has been rising in the GOP since the election of Obama and the Tea Party movement.

brucedanckwerts Oct 28, 2024, 07:27 AM

The idea of technocrats grabbing more power for themselves is very scary they already have 2 much. No doubt Democracy is struggling. The solution is not less but more. Imagine a government where the Min of Ag is elected by farmers Min of Ed by teachers Min of Health by Doctors Min of Fin by bankers

megapode Oct 28, 2024, 11:57 AM

You'd have the matter of voters claiming to be farmers having to prove it. Followed quickly by claims of registration fraud. Then what would you do about corporates that own multiple farms? Often the imperfect systems we have are the best we've been able to come up with.

Jennifer D Oct 28, 2024, 07:46 AM

Imagine a country where the ignorant elect a government comprised almost exclusively of criminals who refuse to do the work they are paid exorbitant salaries for - and the country goes into a downward spiral - still the ignorant continue to elect them. Maybe Garvin is right?

Malcolm McManus Oct 28, 2024, 08:11 AM

For sure. I've seen that movie and it didn't end happily ever after.

Ferg Oct 28, 2024, 08:41 AM

Anyone with an IQ higher than a plant, who listens to Harris and her word salads and thinks the world would be safe in her hands ...... has a terminal case of Trump Derangement Syndrome. the modern leftie is a frightening beast

Malcolm McManus Oct 28, 2024, 09:19 AM

Agreed, Whilst I don't think either of the two candidates should be the best that USA can offer Harris is an empty vessel. I have yet to hear her make an above surface comment on her policy. She just simply can't answer a question and we don't really know what she stands for.

User Oct 28, 2024, 09:31 AM

Then it's obviously far better to vote for the lying felon who seeks to introduce a kingship in the US. Give democracy a nice kiss goodbye.

Malcolm McManus Oct 28, 2024, 10:00 AM

In an ideal world there would be more intelligent candidates, that talk about their policies and how to make America great again rather than berating each other. There has been a Trump presidency before, and despite covid it went fairly well. Better than the last 4 years. Better the devil you know.

BillyBumhe Oct 28, 2024, 10:56 AM

America is already great and it's not thanks to Trump. The severe challenge is the national debt, but Trump's remedies will even worse for that than Harris's. His first term tells the story...

Richard Kennard Oct 28, 2024, 12:48 PM

The problem is that we know this devil and he's vindictive & clearly losing it.

Malcolm McManus Oct 28, 2024, 01:26 PM

The real America is no longer so great, and its imploding. Give it ten years at the rate its going and you won't recognize it. And Richard, you aren't analyzing the devil, your analyzing what the left wing media and Harris says about Trump losing it. They are emulating criticism of Bidens decline.

Richard Kennard Oct 28, 2024, 02:22 PM

I watch both spectrums of the political discourse...you are welcome to inspect my youtube algorithms

Rodney Weidemann Oct 28, 2024, 11:11 AM

Anyone with an IQ above 25 who thinks the leader of the free world should be a sociopathic narcissist with multiple indictions for fraud, multiple declared bankruptcies, and multiple convictions for sexual abuse, is truly the deranged one. The modern right is frighteningly fascist...

Ferg Oct 28, 2024, 11:24 AM

sadly rodney your views are due to the diet of nonsense that is Sky/BBC/ CNN and the old faithful MSNBC. not to mention the completely biased "expert" on the M&G Mr Spector. The cure for TDS is an open enquiring unbiased mind. simple really. Here endeth the lesson

John P Oct 28, 2024, 11:44 AM

Please advise us of your sources so as to provide some contrast.

Malcolm McManus Oct 28, 2024, 12:53 PM

Most of the sources follow a narrative either way. Its best to absorb all of it with "an open enquiring unbiased mind" and then decide for yourself. The answer will be somewhere in the middle. But most of all actually listen to the substance of what the candidates say while using a BS filter.

Richard Kennard Oct 28, 2024, 12:45 PM

You do believe in debate? Please provide us with your unbiased sources.

Pieter van de Venter Oct 28, 2024, 11:15 AM

The long and short of US presidents (and most countries) - they are the talking heads. Somewhere in the dark rooms behind them, are the puppet masters. Look at our own Cyril - Between his vice and party chairman, they refused the portfolio of Trade/Industry to go to the "white" party.

Johan Buys Oct 28, 2024, 09:10 AM

The existing system served these billionaires well enough - without them having done any public service. Imho these few guys have a vastly inflated opinion of themselves and their wealth. The rest of corporate America is ten thousand times bigger and made of real, honest leaders.

MT Wessels Oct 28, 2024, 02:46 PM

The Randian tech bros' wealth is facilitated by democracy. Their targets are regulation and tax, but their fervour will end in Russian kleptocracy or worse - Chinese dictatorship. Your view IS the prevailing one: millions more will vote Dem; Trump needs the Electoral College and 150k swing votes.

johnbpatson Oct 28, 2024, 09:42 AM

His and others' basic point is that democracy is a sham, and voting is to participate in a masquerade with government remaining in the hands of the "cabals" (usually Jewish). Funny that this gets such support in South Africa where "the struggle" was to get the vote.

John P Oct 28, 2024, 10:10 AM

A little right wing anti-semitic bias creeping in there John?

Malcolm McManus Oct 28, 2024, 10:24 AM

Probably democracy isn't a magic wand that makes everything wonderful as is the general expectation. Like other systems it is worth criticizing. There are many examples of this, especially here at home. Personally I still wouldn't change it though.

Richard Kennard Oct 28, 2024, 11:05 AM

The electoral college does make a sham of the US democratic ideal though.

Malcolm McManus Oct 28, 2024, 11:37 AM

Yes, its had its place in history, but high time for rethinking.

BillyBumhe Oct 28, 2024, 10:53 AM

I've had far more innocous comments rejected than this poisonous ant-Semitic nonsense.

BillyBumhe Oct 28, 2024, 11:00 AM

Trump is a crass, racist schoolyard bully who punches down and cheats in every aspect of his life from golf to business dealings to his family. He is not fit for any sort of political office.

cwf51 Oct 28, 2024, 11:00 AM

The word "democracy" has been proven to be an oxymoron since in USA, they deform the voters' choice bye their electoral arrangement and in the RSA, the voters' votes also gets overwritten by the president just creation more ministerial position to skew what the voters voted for.

Pieter van de Venter Oct 28, 2024, 11:08 AM

As a resident and educator of SA, you should be able to understand the Trump attraction. We have had similar cases locally. Look at the cult like following of the ANC and the EFF. The offer nothing except warning against the whites and future white rule. And, foreigners. Exactly the same.

Skinyela Oct 28, 2024, 11:48 AM

"The offer nothing except warning against the whites and future white rule." 1. Is 'what rule' the only alternative? 2. Do the whites organise themselves, politically, on racial lines?

megapode Oct 28, 2024, 12:13 PM

The SA politicians most resembling Trump and trying to build a similar platform are Mashaba and McKenzie: Self made men, can make deals & get things done, a long streak of xenopobia, endlessly recycling rumours . Mashaba in particular disrespects due process. Look at their shares of the vote.

megapode Oct 28, 2024, 12:02 PM

A few years ago I decided that most folks these days are annoyed by career politicians who have never done anything else & are out of touch with real life. But Vance is now the other extreme. His political career goes back to 2022 when won the senate election in Ohio.

Peter Wanliss Oct 28, 2024, 05:10 PM

What happened to the 2017 promise by Trump to replace Obama Care with better health care at a fraction of the cost? It was quite a thing in the run-up to the election.

trashymcrockst Dec 14, 2024, 06:26 AM

"Emergence of a new movement..." This article is at least a decade late. NRx isn't new and they've been influencing American politics since at least 2016.