Dailymaverick logo

Maverick News

This article is more than a year old

JUDICIARY IN CRISIS

Impeached judge John Hlophe barred from JSC processes, Western Cape High Court rules

The DA and Corruption Watch had sought an urgent court order to prevent impeached judge John Hlophe from participating in sittings of the Judicial Service Commission. 'This ruling is a major step in safeguarding the independence and credibility of our judicial system,' said the DA on Friday.
OD-Tori-Hlophe-ruling The Western Cape Division of the High Court has interdicted impeached judge and uMkhonto Wesizwe party (MK) deputy president John Hlophe from taking part in the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) processes, pending a review of the National Assembly’s decision to designate him to the commission. (Photo: Gallo Images / Luba Lesolle)

The Western Cape Division of the High Court has interdicted impeached judge and uMkhonto Wesizwe party (MK) deputy president John Hlophe from taking part in the Judicial Service Commission (JSC) processes, pending a review of the National Assembly’s decision to designate him to the commission. 

The Court handed down judgment on Friday morning, in three separate applications brought by the DA, Freedom Under Law and Corruption Watch, challenging Hlophe’s designation to the JSC.

In its judgment, the court granted an interim interdict in favour of the DA and Corruption Watch’s applications, preventing Hlophe from participating in the JSC processes, pending Part B of their cases where they are seeking final relief from the court declaring the National Assembly’s decision to designate Hlophe to the JSC unlawful, or pending the determination of a similar case before the Constitutional Court. 

This means Hlophe is now barred from the JSC sittings in October.

Freedom Under Law had sought a final order from the Western Cape Division of the High Court, declaring the National Assembly’s decision to appoint Hlophe to the JSC unconstitutional and invalid, setting the decision aside and referring it back to the National Assembly to take the decision afresh in accordance with the court’s judgment.

On Friday, the court postponed Freedom Under Law’s application to be heard simultaneously with Part B of the DA and Corruption Watch’s case, or until the case before the Constitutional Court is determined. 

In February, Hlophe, the former Western Cape judge president, became the first person to be impeached as a judge in democratic South Africa, after a parliamentary vote in favour of his removal. 

His removal followed a JSC process that found him guilty of gross misconduct, in that he had tried, in 2008, to influence two Constitutional Court judges to “violate their oaths of office” and to rule favourably in a matter involving former president Jacob Zuma.

Read in Daily Maverick: John Hlophe — the Judge President who fought the law; decades later, the law won

He was resurrected as an MP by uMkhonto Wesizwe party (MK) in June 2024, and was subsequently nominated by that party as its representative on the JSC. 

The National Assembly sanctioned his nomination and, on 9 July 2024 it designated Hlophe as one of six members of the National Assembly to serve on the JSC – the same body that found him guilty of gross misconduct. The JSC is made up of 23 members and bears the responsibility of interviewing and recommending candidates for judicial appointment, and also of considering complaints against sitting judges.

Read in Daily Maverick: Urgently needed — a careful and sober discussion about who can be a parliamentarian

The National Assembly’s decision to designate Hlophe to the JSC was immediately challenged in the Western Cape High Court by the DA, Freedom Under Law and Corruption Watch. The cases brought by the DA and the two non-government organisations (NGOs) were heard in tandem in the Western Cape Division of the High Court on 5 and 6 September 2024. 

MK and Hlophe opposed the applications. 

The DA and the two NGOs asked for a ruling from the Western Cape Division of the High Court before the JSC sitting in October. 

The JSC is scheduled to hold interviews for judicial candidates between 7 and 11 October 2024. This includes interviews for the Judge President of the Western Cape High Court (a position Hlophe previously held), as well as for the Constitutional Court – the court before which Hlophe sought to  challenge his impeachment

The applicants argued Hlophe’s participation in the interview process would undermine the integrity of the JSC and public confidence in any of the candidates appointed in the October process. 

Read more:: Hlophe’s last stand against impeachment — conflict quagmire poses quandary for ConCourt

In a statement following the judgment, the DA welcomed the court’s decision. “This is a landmark victory for the DA and for the integrity of South Africa’s judiciary. The court’s decision affirms our position and strengthens the fight to maintain the highest standards of integrity within our judiciary.

"An impeached judge, found guilty of gross misconduct, should not hold a position on the JSC, a body entrusted with the responsibility of selecting judges and upholding the highest standards of judicial integrity,” said the DA’s national spokesperson, Karabo Khakhau. 

"This ruling is a major step in safeguarding the independence and credibility of our judicial system. Allowing Dr Hlophe, who was impeached after a long and contentious legal process, to influence the selection of future judges would have severely damaged public trust in our judiciary and compromised the principles that uphold our democracy,”she said. DM

This is a developing story and will be updated. 

Comments

Loading your account…
louw.nic 27 September 2024 12:51 PM

Fantastic news for the Rule of Law and Judiciary in South Africa. Once again, we see the "fruits" of appointments (in the Judiciary and elsewhere) on bases other than merit.

Johnny Bravo 27 September 2024 01:00 PM

Yes sure, but Cabanac still hasn't resigned. What's going on there?

laurantsystems 27 September 2024 01:18 PM

Fake equivalence. Hlope was found guilty of misconduct and impeached by the national assembly. There aren't even charges against Cabanac.

Malcolm McManus 27 September 2024 02:25 PM

Obvious, Just waiting for a court to find him guilty of gross misconduct I believe. Don't hold your breathe. It may take a while.

Robinson 27 September 2024 02:29 PM

It's been stated in the press. Steenhuisen has begun the due process of formally dismissing him.

B M 27 September 2024 06:01 PM

While obvious, I think it must be said: completely different situations. But if we were to try and draw parallels: Hlophe was impeached through his own deeds, whereas Cabanac will be removed because of the deeds by Steenhuisen.

Malcolm McManus 28 September 2024 09:41 AM

Yep, A big payout on the cards, but by the looks of it, Steenhuizen will try to Trump up or engineer reasons to dismiss him. Either way, Steenhuizen is not in a good place. Sweating, I imagine.

Paul T 27 September 2024 07:53 PM

Whataboutism much?

Richard Blake 28 September 2024 02:09 PM

Hlophie should be in jail, but the rules are different for the ANC criminals.

Skinyela 29 September 2024 05:45 AM

Except that Hlophe is MKP, not ANC.

Bob 27 September 2024 01:18 PM

Lets send this ignominious scoundril off to pasture. Long may the Roman-Dutch principles of honesty and fairness, which are the foundations upon which our legal system is built, prevail.

Mike Lawrie 27 September 2024 07:59 PM

"off to pasture" is too good a thing. Why is he not sent to jail? Surely there should be retribution?

theuns.kruger1958 28 September 2024 08:04 AM

Agree

laurantsystems 27 September 2024 01:20 PM

The astonishing thing here is Hlope's utter lack of shame for his misdeeds. It seems he seriously doesn't think he did anything wrong while he was a judge. Is is a cultural thing, not to grasp concepts like right and wrong or accountability for your actions?

Captain Grumpy 27 September 2024 01:39 PM

It's an arrogance thing that is in all cultures. Mostly shown by people who have made it near the top but never quite made it all the way as they weren't good enough.

Rae 27 September 2024 03:31 PM

All these corrupt legal eagles have the same syndrome. It's a mix of arrogance layered on superiority complexes which they imagine places them above the law and humanity. Former public protector Busisiwe Mkwebane and Dali Mpofu have it in buckets full. All are allies of arch corrupter Jacob Zuma>

Diana Clarke 28 September 2024 02:49 PM

Add Simelane to the mix. I think being "legal minds"- ?‍♀️(Fort Hare comes to mind...) they think they can out manoevre the system.

Louise Wilkins 27 September 2024 03:48 PM

Laura Smith - "Is is a cultural thing, not to grasp concepts like right and wrong or accountability for your actions?" Are you asking if it's a black thing? No it is not. I've noticed a number of extreme comments from you, and others where you contradict yourself. Are you a real person?

laurantsystems 27 September 2024 08:10 PM

No I'm an imaginary bot. I exist solely to trigger woke types. Duh.

d***n@g***.com 28 September 2024 06:18 PM

It's been well established and observed that a certain racist people in power have s culture of unaccountablility. There are Jo extreme comments. Just comments pointing out this fact. And yes it's perfectly fine to call out black racists and their racist culture of unaccountablility

Louise Wilkins 27 September 2024 03:42 PM

Thank goodness!

General 27 September 2024 04:08 PM

I have never done a law module but for an impeached judge to seat on the JSC makes no sense. There will always be conflict of interest in his decisions and morally how do ask others to demonstrate what you failed. Politicians I don't understand them at all.

B M 27 September 2024 06:04 PM

Agreed. I do however think there is place for an impeached judge to provide guidance once they have been reformed. But Hlophe has shown no remorse; so don't expect any reformation. Thus, bar him from any activities involving the judiciary.

claddagh 28 September 2024 09:44 AM

i disagree a judge who was been impeached because of dubious moral judgements cannot be reformed, his decisions on the JSC will always be Questioned!

Diana Clarke 28 September 2024 02:51 PM

They have no integrity, empathy and enormous egos I think.

albertg.glass 27 September 2024 04:13 PM

Sense and sensibilities have prevailed !! Whilst our rights are protected...this was the correct judgement and goes a long way way in restoring faith in the RSA judicial system...

Peter 27 September 2024 05:30 PM

Good to see our law isn't always an ass

Sydney Kaye 28 September 2024 07:09 AM

Another great performance by Mpofu.

Hilary Morris 28 September 2024 10:14 AM

It should be beyond belief that the ANC could have supported his nomination to the JSC. It makes a complete mockery of all their mealy-mouthed protestations of renewal and integrity. It was also a major threat to the GNU. Sadly, it also shows clearly how little understanding they have of morality

Indeed Jhb 28 September 2024 12:32 PM

Excellent news. Would be very interesting to see what motivated the Nat Assembly to sanction his appointment. I imagine they have no idea of the importance of the JSC. Should also have Malema removed he has shown in the previous round of interviews that he is biased

Abel Mngadi 28 September 2024 03:03 PM

This man has been proven to be untrustworthy now he is to be put in a position of trust? Our parliament is full of thieves and corrupt individuals and it looks like it is a criteria to be in parliament. It is about time there must be a criteria to be elected in parliament to bar such characters.

jeff.pillay 28 September 2024 03:36 PM

Roman - Dutch principles of honesty & fairness? The same that allowed foreigners to steal our natural resources. The same that resulted in the masses to be suppressed. Time to throw the colonials laws away.

jeff.pillay 28 September 2024 03:39 PM

John Hlophe waw appointed through the existing parliamentary process. If you want to prevent this then change the process The judicial branch should not interfere in the functioning of the legislative branch & should only rule on breach of our constitution or the interpretation of existing laws.

Rod MacLeod 28 September 2024 04:49 PM

And the legislative branch should not interfere in the functioning of the judicial branch ...