Defend Truth


Time for Africa to rally around a global crimes against humanity treaty

Time for Africa to rally around a global crimes against humanity treaty
The ethnic cleansing in Darfur is one of the crimes against humanity that would be dealt with by a proposed new treaty. (Photo: EPA-EFE/Marwan Ali

Far too many African governments have yet to take an official position on the need to negotiate a treaty dealing with crimes against humanity, including those that have a history of supportive positions on matters of accountability.

 “Wait, why is it that we need a crimes against humanity treaty if we already have the International Criminal Court’s Rome Statute?” asked several activists during a group discussion I attended this week in Ivory Coast’s capital, Abidjan.

With only six months until the UN’s Sixth Committee decides whether to advance the draft articles on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes Against Humanity to treaty negotiations, the need for greater awareness of the draft articles is high, especially in Africa, which has the largest number of states that have yet to expressly weigh in on whether the draft articles should advance to negotiations.

A crimes against humanity treaty would be distinct from the ICC’s Rome Statute. First and foremost, the ICC deals with individual criminal responsibility, while the hoped-for crimes against humanity treaty would concern the responsibility of states to both prevent and punish the crimes.

And it is precisely such a treaty that could open the door for states to hold other states accountable through the International Court of Justice if those obligations are not met.

While genocide and war crimes have dedicated treaties — the Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide and the Geneva Conventions — crimes against humanity exist in customary international law. Having express, delineated agreed-upon provisions in a treaty is far more desirable. Indeed, this is such an obvious gap to be filled that I have yet to meet an activist who did not wish to lend their support to the effort once appreciating its purpose.

Our discussion among Ivorian human rights advocates turned quickly to how to best mobilise Ivory Coast and other African states to support negotiations for the treaty.

The UN’s Sixth Committee met in April in New York to discuss the draft articles and states’ views on whether it is time to move them to formal treaty negotiations. More than 70 countries spoke out in support. However, achieving consensus — the customary operating procedure of this committee — to move the process to negotiations will necessitate more support.

Among African governments, several have taken a clear position. Sierra Leone has shown particular leadership, alongside South Africa and The Gambia. Ghana and Portuguese-speaking African states — Angola, Mozambique, Guinea Bissau, São Tomé and Príncipe, Equatorial Guinea, and Cape Verde — also voiced support at the April session. A couple of others earlier expressed support, including Senegal and Tunisia.

But far too many African governments have yet to take an official position on the need to move these draft articles to negotiations for a treaty dealing with crimes against humanity, including those that have a history of supportive positions on matters of accountability, such as Zambia, Malawi, Lesotho, Namibia, Botswana, Benin, Liberia, Ivory Coast, and Uganda, among others.

The Global Justice Center has disseminated a series of proposals to enhance the draft articles to be gender-competent and survivor-centric. The following crimes, in our view, should be expressly incorporated into the draft articles: forced marriage, reproductive violence, gender apartheid, and the slave trade.

We also are advocating for language that is meaningless at best regarding national pregnancy laws to be removed, for excluding the Rome Statute’s definition of gender, and for adding a definition of victims that recognises the scope of victimhood and language that attends to victims’ needs — including reparations.

But the priority is to advance the process, which has been pending in the UN’s Sixth Committee for multiple years, to the next stage — to treaty negotiations where particular proposals can be further debated.

Advocates, activists, and experts agree. More than 400 civil society groups and individuals, many from Africa, have signed a joint statement calling for their governments to support entering into negotiations on a crimes against humanity treaty.

Governments — particularly the many across Africa that have yet to take a formal position in support of treaty negotiations — should heed the call. DM

Elise Keppler is executive director of the Global Justice Center (GJC), an organisation that uses international law to fight for gender equality. A microsite hosted by GJC on the hoped-for treaty can be accessed at:


Comments - Please in order to comment.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options