Dailymaverick logo

Maverick News

This article is more than a year old

MIDDLE EAST CRISIS OP-ED

Stellenbosch University Senate members call for end to Israel's ‘brutal and barbaric’ destruction in Gaza

The following statement was submitted for discussion to the Stellenbosch University Senate. We are awaiting a special meeting of the Senate to further debate the matter. The signatories below have signed in their individual capacity as members of the Stellenbosch University Senate.
Stellenbosch University Senate members call for end to Israel's ‘brutal and barbaric’ destruction in Gaza A destroyed mosque in Khan Younis after the Israeli military pulled out troops from the southern Gaza Strip, 9 April 2024. (Photo: EPA-EFE / MOHAMMED SABER)

We note that the University of Cape Town and the University of Western Cape have made official statements calling for a ceasefire and immediate aid to Gaza.

We, a collection of individual members of the Stellenbosch University Senate, note with deep concern the ongoing massacre and continued mass displacement of the population of Gaza by the Israeli military since 7 October.

We are appalled by the mass killing of innocent civilians and are dismayed that the Israeli military has targeted non-combatants in Gaza — men, women and children — in their retaliation against Hamas.

We note and mourn the deaths of Israeli civilians in the 7 October attacks on Israel by Hamas. However, no crimes inflicted on Israeli civilians nor any military action taken by Israel, whether in self-defence or in pursuit of its military objectives, can ever justify genocidal actions in retaliation. 

This level of destruction is brutal and barbaric. The extreme trauma of the surviving population continues to worsen as they bury their dead and fear for their lives. The universities in Gaza have been destroyed, some of which were destroyed after their capture by the Israeli military. They are being used as detention centres or military bases.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Middle East crisis news hub

On 26 January 2024, in recognition of the extreme gravity of the situation in Gaza, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ordered Israel to “take all measures within its power” to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of Article II of the Geneva Conventions on the basis that it was plausible that Israel was committing genocide in its attacks on Palestinians in Gaza.

A recent report on the ongoing devastation in Gaza highlights that “Israel has razed 77% of healthcare facilities in Gaza, 68% of telecommunication infrastructure, nearly all municipal and governmental buildings, commercial, industrial and agricultural centres, almost half of all roads, more than 60% of Gaza’s 439,000 homes, 68% of residential buildings — the bombing of the Al-Taj tower in Gaza City on October 25 killed 101 people, including 44 children and 37 women, and injured hundreds — and obliterated refugee camps.

“The attack on the Jabalia refugee camp on October 25 killed at least 126 civilians, including 69 children, and injured 280. Israel has damaged or destroyed Gaza’s universities, all of which are now closed, and 60% of other educational facilities, including 13 libraries. It has also destroyed at least 195 heritage sites, including 208 mosques, churches, and Gaza’s Central Archives that held 150 years of historical records and documents.”

Arguing that Israel is committing genocide has been treated by some university and state authorities as hate speech and/or anti-Semitism. We now know, from a legal perspective, confirmed by the highest court in the world, that there are plausible legal grounds to argue that genocide is, in fact, taking place. 

Yet the repression of public criticism of Israel remains profound and widespread by labelling any criticism of Israeli actions as anti-Semitic.

On 25 March, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) demanded an immediate ceasefire between Israel and the Palestinian group Hamas in the Gaza Strip and the release of all hostages.

As members of the Stellenbosch University Senate, we note:

  • The mass killings of Palestinian civilians, teachers, educators, professors, healthcare workers, students, learners and patients;
  • The absolute devastation of the education system, both basic and higher education in Gaza, since Israel’s attack in October 2023;
  • The unjustified but widespread clampdown across the world on legitimate public criticism of Israeli policies in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (OPT) and on its conduct of the war in Gaza and the false conflation of such legitimate criticism with anti-Semitism;
  • That the devastation of an education system may contribute to the destruction of a group’s culture, religion, and identity and therefore comprise a form of cultural genocide; and
  • That criticism of the extent of destruction of civilian infrastructure and the killing of teachers and university staff in Gaza is not an act of anti-Semitism.

As a collection of individual members of the Stellenbosch University Senate, we believe that:

  • It is unacceptable to suppress legitimate criticism of parties’ behaviour in the Gaza War, particularly when the ICJ has found plausible evidence of a genocide taking place in Gaza;
  • The manipulation of the definition of anti-Semitism to include any criticism of Israel or Zionism is both intellectually without foundation and a violation of academic freedom;
  • The academic freedom to voice opinions in scholarly and public debates on Gaza must be defended as a matter of principle;
  • Colleagues who have suffered discrimination and harassment as a result of speaking out against the invasion deserve our support and protection; and
  • The evidence suggesting that the destruction of Gaza’s education systems was a deliberate plan of the Israeli military must be examined by the ICJ in its determination of genocidal intent.

As members of the Stellenbosch University Senate, we:

  • Call for an immediate ceasefire and the cessation of attacks on civilians, the passage of humanitarian aid and the return of all captives;
  • Condemn the destruction of the education sector in Gaza and the massive scale of killing of teachers and university staff in the current war;
  • Urge the international community to ensure that the provision of humanitarian aid includes the restoration of the education sector in Gaza;
  • Express our concern and opposition to any attempts to curtail academic freedom by labelling criticism of Israel or Zionist policies as anti-Semitism;
  • Express our support for academic colleagues in Gaza who are surviving under appalling conditions and our intention to assist in the rebuilding of the academic sector after the war;
  • Express our solidarity with academic colleagues victimised for their willingness to speak out against the educide in Gaza; and
  • Urge our colleagues at Stellenbosch University and all other institutions of higher learning not to knowingly enter into relations, or continue relations with, any research group and/or network that includes current members of the Israel Defense Forces, and/or any member of the broader Israeli military establishment.

Signed by members of the Stellenbosch University Senate in our individual capacity:

Professor Ashraf Kagee, Department of Psychology

Professor Desmond Painter, Department of Psychology

Professor Pieter Fourie, Department of Political Science

Professor Sally Ann Murray, Department of English

Professor Juliana Claassens, Faculty of Theology 

Professor Jeremy Punt, Department of Old & New Testament

Professor Geo Quinot, Department of Public Law

Professor Reggie Nel, Faculty of Theology

Professor Mawande Dlali, Department of African Languages

Dr Leslie van Rooi, Senior Director; Social Impact and Transformation 

Professor Ronelle Carolissen, Department of Psychology

Professor Lize van Robbroeck, Department of Visual Arts

Professor Anita Cloete, Department of Practical Theology and Missiology

Professor Mehita Iqani, Department of Journalism 

Professor Aslam Fataar, Department of Education Policy Studies

Professor Nuraan Davids, Department of Education Policy Studies

Professor Amanda Gouws, Department of Political Science

Professor Herman Wasserman, Department of Journalism

Professor Faadiel Essop, Division of Medical Physiology

Professor Mark Tomlinson, Institute for Life Course Health Research 

Professor Leslie Swartz, Department of Psychology 

Dr Therese Fish, Vice Dean of Clinical Services and Social Impact, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences 

Professor Ian Couper, Ukwanda Centre for Rural Health, Department of Global Health

Professor Steven Robins, Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology

Professor Robert Vosloo, Department of Systematic Theology & Ecclesiology

Professor Tina Steiner, Department of English

Professor Susan van Schalkwyk, Centre for Health Professions Education

Professor Louis Jonker, Department of Old and New Testament

Professor Soraya Bardien, Department of Biomedical Sciences

Professor Jonathan Carr, Department of Medicine

Professor Mias de Klerk, Stellenbosch Business School

Professor Razeen Davids, Division of Nephrology 

Mr Rubeshan Nayager, Unit Manager: BMRI Biorepository, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences 

Professor Sadulla Karjiker, Department of Mercantile Law, Faculty of Law

Professor Marlo Möller, Department of Biomedical Sciences

Professor Craig Kinnear, Department of Biomedical Sciences

Professor Karen Esler, Dept. Conservation Ecology & Entomology

Dr Mareli Pretorius, Department of Drama

Professor Mark Swilling, Centre for Sustainability Transitions

Professor Sandra Liebenberg, Chair in Human Rights Law, Department of Public Law

Professor Johann Mouton, CREST

Professor Lesley Le Grange, Department of Curriculum Studies

Professor Tania Ajam, School of Public Leadership

Ms Ellen Tise, Senior Director: Library and Information Services

Ms Miriam Hoosain, Chief Director, Human Resources

Professor Zwelinzima Ndevu, School of Public Leadership

Professor Savel R Daniels, Department of Botany and Zoology

Professor Catharine Esterhuysen, Department of Chemistry and Polymer Science

Professor Johann Rohwer, Department of Biochemistry

Ilhaam Groenewald, Chief Director, Maties Sport

Reagan Johnson, SRC Executive

Amory Smith, AAC Representative

Professor Samantha Sampson, Department of Biomedical Sciences

Professor Michael Cherry, Department of Botany and Zoology

Professor Wikus van Niekerk, Dean of Engineering (on sabbatical)

Professor Lou Marie Kruger, Department of Psychology

Professor Heather Brookes, Department of General Linguistics

Professor Lambert Engelbrecht, Department of Social Work

Professor Clive Gray, Division of Immunology, Biomedical Research Institute

Professor Nadine Bowers Du Toit, Faculty of Theology

Professor Donita Africander, Department of Biochemistry

Professor Bruce Anderson, Department of Botany and Zoology

Professor Christine Lochner, Department of Psychiatry 

Professor Soraya Seedat, Department of Psychiatry

Professor Stefan Gebhardt, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Professor Louise du Toit, Philosophy Department

Professor Grant Theron, Department of Biomedical Sciences

Professor Henk Botha, Department of Public Law

Professor Bernard Wessels, Department of Private Law

Professor Lana van Niekerk, Division of Occupational Therapy

Professor Sarah Skeen, Institute for Life Course Health Research, Department of Global Health

Professor Janis van der Westhuizen, Department of Political Science

Professor Xikombiso Mbhenyane, Division of Human Nutrition

Professor Sophie von der Heyden, Department of Botany and Zoology

Professor Peter Mallon, Department of Chemistry and Polymer Science

Professor Paramespri Naidoo, Department of Chemical Engineering

Professor Vasti Roodt, Department of Philosophy

Professor Novel Chegou, Department of Biomedical Sciences

Professor Corne Schutte, Vice-Dean: Research and Industry Liaison, Engineering

Professor Marianne Strydom, Department of Social Work

Professor Anna-Maria Botha, Genetics

Professor Lynette van Zijl, Computer Science

Professor Léanne Dreyer, Department of Botany and Zoology

Professor Estelle Swart, Department of Educational Psychology

Professor Liezel Frick, Centre for Higher and Adult Education

Professor Bob Mash, Department of Family and Emergency Medicine

Professor Juanita Pienaar, Department of Private Law

Professor Thuli Madonsela, Centre for Social Justice 

Professor Selwyn Mapolie, Department of Chemistry

Professor Regan Solomons, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health

Professor Gunnar Sigge, Department of Food Science

Professor Anna-Mart Engelbrecht, Department of Physiological Sciences

Dr Susan Hall, Department of Philosophy 

Professor Kathryn Chu, Centre for Global Surgery

Professor Kopano Ratele, Department of Psychology 

Professor Emanuel Bylund, Department of General Linguistics

Professor Andries Visagie, Department of Afrikaans and Dutch

Professor Pregala Solosh Pillay, School of Public Leadership

Bantubonke Louw, Senior Manager: Centre for Academic Administration, Bellville Park Campus

Professor Henry Mbaya, Faculty of Theology, Stellenboch 

Professor Maritha Kotze, Division of Chemical Pathology

Professor Andrew Whitelaw, Division of Medical Microbiology

Professor Bernard Dubbeld, Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology. DM

Comments

marc36 Apr 11, 2024, 03:04 PM

It is well known that the rise of National Socialism in the mid 1930's was supported by German academia (read the work done by Grüttner, Klemperer, Altbach, Brockhoff, Detzen, Hoffmann, Goldhagen, McClelland, MacGregor, Mantel, Nicklisch, Paletschek etc). It is a source of great shame for Germany today. The light-sleeping antisemitism on Ivy League campuses in the USA currently was not only a disdainful matter in front in Congress, it continues to be disgusting. This revolting message that goes out of its way to not so much as mention the innocent Israeli hostages innocently and brutally kidnapped on Oct 7, never mind calling for their unconditional release, nor does it even mention Hamas (not once!) - speaks about the signatories, not their stance. They can plead that they are not antisemites until the cows come home. If it walks like a duck ... Shame on them.

skyfriedri Apr 11, 2024, 03:49 PM

So if a woman slaps a man, she is automatically a sexist, and did it because she hates men. If anyone condemns the actions of Pol Pot, they are anti-Hindu (the national religion of Cambodia). If a brunette criticises the crimes of a blonde, it's automatically because of hatred for all people with that hair colour. To make the connection of racism, which is what antisemitism is, means that the Israeli government cannot ever be critisiced, no matter what it does, because it would mean the accuser is automatically racist towards Jewish people. So some governments, the ones of a country with a national religion, cannot ever be criticised? Please...

marc36 Apr 11, 2024, 06:12 PM

Mr Hypothetical - when a so-called independent third party deems, of all the issues in the world, it necessary to virtue signal by making its statement about any conflict whatsover (men/women, Pol-Pot/Hindu, blondes/everyone else, whatever other example you want to hypothesize over) - and not so much as MENTION the other party in statement (i.e. Hamas - which is purposely excluded), let alone the cause it is in dispute over (Israel / the IDF has explicitly stated its intention is destroy Hamas and return the hostages that were kidnapped on Oct 7) ... then yes - the statement is blatant in stinking of what it is.

John P Apr 13, 2024, 01:35 PM

“Israel / the IDF has explicitly stated its intention is destroy Hamas and return the hostages that were kidnapped on Oct ” And there is no other way to achieve this? Only massive military force is the answer? Never negotiate?

marc36 Apr 16, 2024, 07:03 PM

You must misunderstand the middle east, and not be aware of Israel's previous attempts at negotiations

John P Apr 11, 2024, 04:18 PM

Mordechai in a way you remind me of Julius Malema. If anyone points out where he, his beliefs, the actions of himself or his party etc are wrong his immediate response is to accuse people of racism.

marc36 Apr 11, 2024, 05:00 PM

Close to 50% of this statement is them defending their right to say what they want and not be called antisemites. Heck, if you are an antisemite (you included John) - just go ahead and say it. We see you anyhow. It's better like this John.

John P Apr 11, 2024, 08:50 PM

Please do not pretend to know what I am. I am certainly not a racist or antisemite(the same thing really) I am anti a nation, any nation, that believes they are above and beyond reproach and have a right to treat others in any way they see fit. Even more I am anti those who resort to simplistic accusations of racism in order to protect their position whilst defending the indefensible.

marc36 Apr 12, 2024, 12:56 PM

The racist's retort is always to say they are not one. Your views, and therefore your evidence, is all over your posts John. We see you.

skyfriedri Apr 12, 2024, 09:33 AM

50% of what the IDF apologists say are attacks on the person decrying the atrocities in Gaza, and the other 50% is calling the person a racist (antisemite). Very little about the actual topic at hand, mostly personal attacks.

marc36 Apr 12, 2024, 12:59 PM

No apology, ever. You misread. I could not be prouder to support. As for not addressing the topics - go re-look at all of my responses. Or are you addressing someone else?

Kenneth FAKUDE Apr 11, 2024, 08:04 PM

The reason why the October 7 victims cannot be mentioned in isolation is because this is an informed institution of learning, they cannot start the story on ocober7, they have well documented terror by Israel and the means applied. Their summary of victims will be compounded and the root of the problem will be the main culprit. Why do you think Israel targets institutions of learning and floods them with billions?

marc36 Apr 12, 2024, 12:54 PM

Name one, give evidence of Israel flooding institutions of learning (particularly in SA) instead of throwing out nonsensical blood libels. At the Congressional Hearing into antisemitism earlier this year - the following evidence of "gifts" for American universities from foreign countries since 2012: Qatar $3,281,809,233 China $1,733,894,910 Saudi Arabia $1,454,621,857 UAE $635,818,317 Kuwait $338,726,100 Russia $141,080,439 Turkey $81,509,310 Iraq $45,531,664 Lebanon $21,365,783 Pakistan $6,474,520 Venezuela $4,012,132 Syria $1,364,702 No doubt Iran is lurking in the shadows there too, but years of sanctions has them as master of money laundering and having others do their bidding. Follow the money. Here is a well-financed Islamist systematic campaign of antisemitic hatred being well financed and fueled.

melfrykbe Apr 12, 2024, 05:50 PM

Oh the perpetual victim even when supporting the indiscriminate slaughter and human rights abuses. Offended by everything and ashamed of nothing. I bet some of those Israeli soldiers reveling in the killing and torture of Palestinians get bad headaches. Poor babies. Cry me a river....again.

marc36 Apr 16, 2024, 04:52 PM

Well thought out logical response M F. Thanks for answering the question too.

Bill Gild Apr 11, 2024, 06:04 PM

Where was the university of Stellenbosch's voice during apartheid and during the Brown Shirt rampages in SA prior to and dring WWII? The senate's statement reeks of hypocrisy, cozying up to the ANC, and just plain vanilla antisemitism. Nothing about it surprises me.

melfrykbe Apr 11, 2024, 08:40 PM

Most people don't believe that Israel should be the exception when it comes to crimes of possible genocide, human rights abuses, the deliberate targeting of aid workers, journalists, and the disproportionate slaughter of civilians. Just because Israel has been given a free pass to carry out these abuses in the past by the hypocritical West doesn't mean it will get away with it forever. No country is above international law. And hiding behind lame accusations of anti-Semitism when you no longer have a valid argument is an insult to those who have suffered from real racism and bigotry. And frankly it's not taken seriously.

marc36 Apr 12, 2024, 01:04 PM

"Most people" believe many things. They aren't necessary correct. The truth isn't a popularity contest.

melfrykbe Apr 12, 2024, 04:41 PM

Democracy is obviously a problem for you. It seems that more and more of the world is getting "anti-Semitic" in regards to criticism of Israeli abuses, according to your logic. It couldn't be that Israel's human rights abuses deserve condemnation just as other countries that commit human rights abuses do. It must be that everybody that criticises this just hates Jews. Even Israel's staunchest supporters such as the US and UK are also questioning Israel's behaviour. I guess they too must be "anti-semitic". It must be hard for you being a prophet of the truth in a world full of people who haven't seen the light.

melfrykbe Apr 13, 2024, 08:18 AM

Democracy is obviously a problem for you. It seems that more and more of the world is getting “anti-Semitic” in regards to criticism of Israeli abuses, according to your logic. It couldn’t be that Israel’s human rights abuses deserve condemnation just as other countries that commit human rights abuses do. It must be that everybody that criticises this just hates Jews. Even Israel’s staunchest supporters such as the US and UK are also questioning Israel’s behaviour. I guess they too must be “anti-semitic”. It must be hard for you being a prophet of the truth in a world full of people who haven’t seen the light. Reply

marc36 Apr 16, 2024, 05:01 PM

The truth never pretended to be popular or democratic - just plain true. The same way as good is not the same as evil.

skyfriedri Apr 12, 2024, 01:57 AM

I am shocked to the bone. There are thousands of our fellow human beings being killed, along with their homes, places of learning, hospitals, etc., in what is very blatantly and extremely clearly an attempt to eradicate them as a people. Yet the killing is defended by some. Those of us who raise our voices at the atrocities are personally insulted and called idiots. We are told that our words are invalid unless we also decry other atrocities. We are accused of being motivated by a hatred for the Jewish people (which is DEEPLY insulting!). I am shocked. I just can't believe this is actually happening, and that these things are actually being said out loud, and genuinely believed. I am very, very sad today. How can so much killing actually be defended, in public, and when typing their defenses that involve nothing more than attacks and deeply offensive insults to those of us saying that the killing is wrong, how can they go back and read it, and not realise what they are saying? I'm extremely dismayed today.

JP K Apr 12, 2024, 11:20 PM

I hear you man. I've felt that. For me it's not just the attrocities and injustice. It's those who defend the indefensible. Who mock those trying to argue for human rights. Human dignity. This is how genocide happens. This is how apartheid happens. This is how wars in distant parts of the world happen. With people going on with their lives looking the other way. Ministers ministering. Academics in their ivory towers. Politicians politicking. And so on. I don't know how to say this without sounding trite, but there are good people out there. And it helps to try and connect with them.

douglas.n.wade Apr 12, 2024, 02:02 AM

The lengthy debate already on this topic seems to miss the point somewhat. Critics of the Israeli conduct of the war are not anti-Semitic but anti-Netanyahu's government. Sadly that government, by describing it as anti- Semitism, makes targets of all Israeli Jews. In the long term what Israel will bitterly regret is not so much the dead, but the survivors, who will every day for three generations see the mutilated, the stunted, the impoverished and the under-educated among their communities, and will welcome another Saladin. What is so depressing is Netanyahu's absolute refusal to understand or admit that ultimately the two sides must reach a political solution.

marc36 Apr 12, 2024, 01:15 PM

Douglas I am not sure, from your comment, if 1) you read this statement from the University or 2) if you have visited Israel recently (since Oct 7, if at all). On 1) - the statement is all about condemning Israel and going about, at length, giving reasons why it has the right to do so and NOT be labelled antisemites. Who the heck do they think they are. Let them say what they like, make any damn statement they like, but don't think you have the right to tell us, who support Israel, not to call you EXACTLY what we think, and know you to be! On 2) whoever underestimates the fortitude of Jews under pressure has always, always, always been proven wrong. This time we aren't being marched into gas chambers, or being imprisoned in ghettos, or with Crusader's swords at our necks. Now we have our own country, and one of the most powerful armies in the world. Let them come ...

John P Apr 12, 2024, 03:10 PM

Spoken like a true bigot with a massive chip on his shoulder

John P Apr 12, 2024, 03:10 PM

Spoken like a true bigot with a massive chip on his shoulder

douglas.n.wade Apr 13, 2024, 06:51 PM

In response: 1 You are here committing the very error I remarked on, by assuming, wrongly, that all critics are anti-Semitic. Do you accept that the Palestinians are also Semitic? 2 War without end: is that your solution? If so, does Israel have any moral right to exist; and is its continued existence, moral or otherwise, then guaranteed?

marc36 Apr 16, 2024, 05:15 PM

1) It is a trite conversation to debate if Palestinians are 'semitic'. Are we going to debate semantics while there is war on the ground? 2) The State of Israel, in its current form (or any form), has as much right to exist (or for that matter not to exist) as any other sovereign state. States are formed by politics, annexation or war. The disproportionate argument always seems to be that the only 'Sovereign State' that constantly has its existence discussed and debated is the world's only Jewish one (in a world where more than 20% of all countries have a state religion). I call that endemic antisemitism. Jews are expected to be a minority in the countries they live in, or better still, rather not exist at all.

skyfriedri Apr 12, 2024, 02:12 AM

After being personally attacked and angrily insulted by being accused of racism for saying that wrong is wrong, when it clearly is, what result do the defenders of the war hope to achieve with their method of defending the killing? That we will say "Oh yes, you're right, we'll shut up, let the killing continue"? If anything, they have motivated me more to sell everything and go and actually make a positive difference in the world by doing humanitarian work in Gaza more than ever. IDF sympathisers: you're not doing yourselves or Israel's government's image any favours here, you're just isolating yourselves, not convincing us that what is being done in the middle east is justified or right. How can you possibly, by personally insulting people who stand up for other humans lives and livelihoods when they are being destroyed?

marc36 Apr 12, 2024, 01:18 PM

And you have motivated me to add R1800 in the name of LukeS to the R1800 in the name of JohnP was that I was already donating before Shabbat to the United Israel Appeal. Thank you!

John P Apr 12, 2024, 03:13 PM

I am surprised you needed us to motivate you, with your closed minded support of the indefensible you should have been donating anyway.

marc36 Apr 12, 2024, 05:04 PM

You know how they say "not in my name"? Well, the extra will be in your name, as my motivation. Shabbat Shalom John

Lucifer's Consiglieri Apr 12, 2024, 11:03 PM

No doubt Bibi has een in two minds about how to proceed, having been waiting with bated breath to hear the perspective of the Stellenbosch University Senate on the question of how to manage the threat posed by an organisation whose avowed aim is the annihilation of his nation and all of its people. I am sure that he will swiftly adjust his strajectory accordingly.

ace00864 Apr 13, 2024, 02:49 AM

Good riddance. I am actually humbled if leaders take such actions. What is happening in Gaza is horrible, it is so sad that atrocities are happening at this time when human rights and democracy rhetorics are like are thrown at random lying like waste when municipality workers are on strike. In fact the whole world has failed the people of Gaza, but again we have failed as humans. We are infact like animals watching with fear when one of them is being mauled. The world lacks truth and honesty, according to the teachings of the great books real cowsrds are those who lack LOVE, TRUTH and PEACE. The definition of "coward" we found in dictionaries is a corrupted one. So we failed fellow human beings and we failed the creator who created us and LOVE us all regardless of colour and creed. Something of this nature should never happen now and never again infront of us. We must force all our leaders Prime ministers and President to call a special sitting of the United Nations and stop this war.

domwe Apr 14, 2024, 05:45 AM

Instead of worrying about the 27 000 people (including around 11,000 Hamas Terrorists) killed in Gaza , maybe we should be focussing on the 27,000 people that are murdered in South Africa ( 2023 statistics) every year . Thats right , our murder rate is 700% higher that the USA and our violent death rate is higher than the deaths caused by Americans during the Iraq war . We have a murder rate as high as a war zone , and its time to focus on our pwn problems

Yaakov Rashi Apr 14, 2024, 10:21 PM

Somehow, in that detailed petition Stellenbosch’s academics forgot to mention the last 20 years of Hamas murdering Jews, and being perfectly clear that their anti-Zionism is specifically about exterminating Jews. The ‘senate’ also forgot to mention that there is no evidence of genocide in Gaza: it’s been proven the Hamas-run Gaza Ministry of Health (a) grossly inflated casualty numbers (2) and labeled every casualty, including armed Hamas soldiers as “civilians”: this is a breach of the Laws of War to label. The current casualty ratio in Gaza is 1:2 - ie 1 combatant per 2 civilians - while the global average is 1:9. It’s factually dishonest to call *that* a “genocide”. The senate also neglected to mention that Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and scores of civilians stole over 250 Israeli civilians and soldiers, then directly contacted their families to psychologically terrorize them, while refusing to release the hostages. The one-liner about Oct 7’s victims neglects to mention the thousands of missiles Palestinian militias have launched on civilians since Oct 7. The Stellenbosch lot also clearly didn’t read UN or EU findings about Hamas using civilians, hospitals, mosques, schools as weapons storage and launch zones. No country that faces Gaza’s homicidal government can let them evade justice simply bc they exploit their own civilians as ‘human shields’.

John P Apr 16, 2024, 09:14 AM

A collection of half truths carefully twisted and presented as facts to defend the indefensible.

marc36 Apr 16, 2024, 07:01 PM

Still looking for anything untrue there (how is something half true?), or non-factual, or in defence of anything other than not capitulating, lying down and meekly dying - which John and his fellow antisemites would have the world's Jews do.

John P Apr 17, 2024, 09:52 AM

Resorting to unfounded accusations and slurs does not do your cause any good.

John P Apr 16, 2024, 09:10 AM

Now that is a stupid antisemetic comment