Maverick Citizen

ISS TODAY OP-ED

SA’s deployment of new Crime Prevention Wardens may be against constitution and even illegal

SA’s deployment of new Crime Prevention Wardens may be against constitution and even illegal
Pass out parade for the second cohort of the Crime Prevention Wardens in Tsakane, City of Ekurhuleni. (Photo: Gauteng Provincial Government)

Are initiatives by Gauteng province and to a lesser extent Cape Town, legal and suitable for improving safety?

Two recent South African law enforcement initiatives, one in Cape Town, and the other in Gauteng, have provoked interest and in some cases, controversy.

Both have been launched without explicit parliamentary authorisation. Because they involve or are intended to involve, the deployment of armed personnel, they raise questions regarding Section 199(3) of the country’s constitution that says “armed organisations or services may only be established in terms of national legislation”.

In 2019, the City of Cape Town, with financial support from the Western Cape provincial government, initiated the Law Enforcement Advancement Plan (Leap). This enables it to supplement the South African Police Service’s (SAPS) capacity in areas with high murder rates in the metro. By June 2023, 1,235 Leap officers had been appointed.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Police release photos of trio linked to slaying of Cape Town Leap officers — R1.35m reward still on offer

In November 2022, Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi announced that the Gauteng provincial government would establish a 6,000-strong force of Crime Prevention Wardens (CPWs). After a rushed recruitment process, an initial 3,200 were appointed in May 2023.

There are distinct differences between the two initiatives. Unlike Gauteng’s CPWs, which are newly created, Leap is an expansion of Cape Town’s existing law enforcement capacity.

Leap officers are not police but “peace officers”. These are law enforcement officials, referred to in South Africa’s Criminal Procedure Act, whose powers are more limited than those of the SAPS or metro police. Leap is in line with a 2018 Government Gazette that authorises municipalities to appoint peace officers.

There is no equivalent Government Gazette authorising provincial governments to appoint peace officers. In December 2023, the Ministry of Justice announced that the Gauteng government was authorised to appoint peace officers if they were hired as traffic officers. But the 2011 Gazette that the justice ministry referred to deals with traffic officers appointed by the national Road Traffic Management Corporation, and doesn’t apply to provincial governments. Deployment of the CPWs as peace officers is therefore illegal.

There are other significant differences between the two initiatives. The Cape Town metro has followed an incremental approach to expanding Leap, enabling consistent selection and training standards to be applied.

But the CPWs establishment shows the risks of allowing components of government to establish armed law enforcement organisations. There is no evidence that Gauteng has given forethought to how it will develop and manage the CPWs, or whether it has the organisational capacity and infrastructure to run a policing agency of this size.

Training inconsistencies 

The provision of training for the CPWs has been ad hoc. The latest batch of 1,785 recruits is being trained by the South African National Defence Force — which lacks the expertise to train police. These recruits bring the total number of CPWs to nearly 5,000, making them the second largest state policing agency in South Africa, after the far larger SAPS.

But have the CPWs, and arguably also Leap in Cape Town, been created in contravention of the country’s constitution? Leap personnel are armed with firearms, and the Gauteng government has indicated that it intends to arm the CPWs as well, though it’s unclear how many currently have guns.

Section 334 of the Criminal Procedure Act allows the Minister of Justice to designate personnel as peace officers. Although it has been on the law books for a long time, it may be used to subvert Section 199(3) of the constitution. Most explicitly, in the case of the Gauteng CPWs, it is being used to circumvent the authority of Parliament.

The unregulated creation of armed law enforcement organisations in South Africa carries serious risks for national security, policing and crime. The justice minister’s response to the CPWs’ creation reflects an indifference to these risks, and is an about-face by the ruling African National Congress, which has vociferously defended centralised control over the police.

Multiple state organisations, including the SAPS itself, already contribute to illegal firearm proliferation because of weapons being lost by, or stolen from, their members. Providing guns to CPWs without the ability to properly manage their distribution and use is likely to aggravate the problem. The Gauteng government’s lack of capacity to train CPWs in firearm use exposes the public to danger from poorly trained ‘police’.

Questions raised by Gauteng’s CPWs include whether provinces have the scope to play a greater role in shaping policing, and whether new armed policing organisations are actually needed. National government’s ability to answer these questions is obstructed by the absence of an effective policy-making machinery.

Provincial governments that want to improve safety should not assume that the answer lies in deploying more armed police. They should rather invest in the types of policing that don’t rely on personnel carrying firearms. DM

David Bruce, Independent Researcher and Institute for Security Studies (ISS) Consultant.

First published by ISS Today.

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • James P says:

    Can we call it “ANC’s deployment” rather than SA’s. There is no need to paint the good people in SA with the dirty corrupt ANC brush.

  • Jabulani Dube says:

    According to the way I see things, this is a private military. Someone is creating his personal army on the expenses of the government, and at the end we may experience some coups. Maybe I m judging wrong. There is something fishy here

  • Just Me says:

    SA is stuck between high crime rates and policing being a national (ANC) incompetence.

  • Geoff Coles says:

    The difference between Cape Town and Gauteng CPW is huge

  • Andre Swart says:

    Lesufi’s agenda!

    ‘He wasn’t prepared to give up his country just because of a few ballots.’

    ‘Mugabe’s thugs impose reign of terror in Zimbabwe!’

    Watch this space!

  • Art Gee says:

    Rush jobs never work… Specially when it comes to safety. & security.
    Seems like once again, WC have done things by the book.

  • Wilhelm Boshoff says:

    Are these wardens not the start of a private ANC army funded by tax payers ?

  • Johan Herholdt says:

    Black men (and women) with guns and minimal (or no) training lording it over a defenceless population make us look like any other African dictatorship and failed state in Africa. We already have the criminal warlords, now we are equipping an army for them.
    I am watching this space with growing concern.

  • Gerrie Pretorius says:

    Gauteng CPW is nothing other than a force to intimidate voters to support the anc. It is no different to the military used in Zimbabwe to intimidate voters to vote for zanu pf. It is an extention of ‘lusufi the racist’ to hang on to power by hook or by crook.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

X

This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.


Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Feeling powerless in politics?

Equip yourself with the tools you need for an informed decision this election. Get the Elections Toolbox with shareable party manifesto guide.