--- title: "International Court of Justice dismisses much of Ukraine’s case against Russia" description: "The 16-judge panel ordered Russia to investigate any plausible allegations of terrorism financing but turned down a request by Kyiv for reparations." type: "NewsArticle" publisher: "Daily Maverick" site: "https://www.dailymaverick.co.za" section: "SETBACK FOR KYIV" author: "Reuters" author_url: "https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/author/reuters/" canonical_url: "https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2024-01-31-international-court-of-justice-dismisses-much-of-ukraines-case-against-russia/" published: "2024-01-31T20:42:44" lang: "en-ZA" word_count: 470 --- # International Court of Justice dismisses much of Ukraine’s case against Russia > The 16-judge panel ordered Russia to investigate any plausible allegations of terrorism financing but turned down a request by Kyiv for reparations. By Reuters · Published 31 January 2024, 22:42 SAST ## Key points - In a legal blow to Ukraine, the top UN court found that Russia violated an anti-terrorism treaty but sidestepped ruling on allegations that Moscow was responsible for the downing of the MH17 passenger plane, while also condemning Russia for failing to support Ukrainian-language education in Crimea after its annexation - leaving Ukraine with no reparations and Russia with a mere slap on the wrist. - UN court finds Russia violated anti-terrorism treaty, but does not rule on MH17 allegations - Russia breached anti-discrimination treaty by not supporting Ukrainian-language education in Crimea - Ukraine's requests for reparations rejected, Russia ordered to comply with treaties - ICJ to rule on Ukraine's accusation of genocide convention misuse by Russia on Friday ## Content Judges at the top UN court on Wednesday found that Russia violated elements of a UN anti-terrorism treaty, but declined to rule on allegations brought by Kyiv that Moscow was responsible for the shooting down of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 over eastern Ukraine in 2014. In the same ruling, judges at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) found that Russia had breached an anti-discrimination treaty by failing to support Ukrainian-language education in Crimea after its 2014 annexation of the peninsula. The decisions were a legal setback for Kyiv. The court rejected Ukraine’s requests to order reparations for both violations and only ordered Russia to comply with the treaties. ![Russian Ambassador-at-Large, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Gennady Kuzmin (left) and lawyer Kirill Udovichenko before the ruling of the International Court of Justice in a lawsuit that Ukraine filed against Russia in The Hague, the Netherlands, 31 January 2024. (Photo: EPA-EFE / Remko de Waal)](https://cdn.dailymaverick.co.za/i/zu2_ddbMtyO8SwRPFDb-_cpHzcc=/200x100/smart/filters:strip_exif\(\)/file/dailymaverick/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/11987237.jpg) *Russian Ambassador-at-Large, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Gennady Kuzmin (left) and lawyer Kirill Udovichenko before the ruling of the International Court of Justice in a lawsuit that Ukraine filed against Russia in The Hague, the Netherlands, 31 January 2024. (Photo: EPA-EFE / Remko de Waal)* Ukraine filed the lawsuit at the ICJ, also known as the World Court, in 2017, accusing Russia of violating an anti-terrorism treaty by funding pro-Russian separatists in Ukraine. The court’s judges said Moscow violated the UN’s anti-terrorism treaty by not investigating plausible allegations that some funds were sent from Russia to Ukraine to possibly fund terrorist activities. The 16-judge panel ordered Russia to investigate any plausible allegations of terrorism financing but turned down a request by Kyiv for reparations. #### **MH17 downing** The court declined to rule on the downing of MH17, saying violations of funding terrorism only applied to monetary and financial support, not to supplying weapons or training alleged by Ukraine. Ukraine had argued that in the case of MH17, Russia supplied the missile system that shot down the aircraft, but it had not alleged financial support in that instance. In a hearing at the court in The Hague last June, Russia dismissed Ukraine’s allegations that it funded and controlled pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine as [fiction](https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-calls-ukraines-mh17-accusations-world-court-fiction-2023-06-14/) and “[blatant lies](https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/russia-accuses-ukraine-blatant-lies-about-crimea-discrimination-mh17-2023-06-08/)”. In the case, which has taken almost seven years, Kyiv had accused Russia of equipping and funding pro-Russian forces, including rebels who shot down MH17 in July 2014, killing all 298 passengers and crew. In November 2022, [a Dutch court sentenced](https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/judges-rule-murder-trial-2014-downing-flight-mh17-over-ukraine-2022-11-17/) two Russians and a Ukrainian in absentia to life imprisonment for their role in the disaster. In Crimea, Ukraine had said Russia was trying to erase the culture of ethnic Tatars and Ukrainians. The court dismissed all of the claims related to the Tatars but found Moscow did not do enough to support Ukrainian language education. The court’s judgments are final and without appeal but it has no way to enforce its rulings. On Friday, the ICJ will rule in another case in which Ukraine has accused Moscow of falsely applying the 1948 Genocide Convention to justify its invasion on 24 February 2022. **DM**