Dailymaverick logo

Maverick News

This article is more than a year old

MIDDLE EAST CRISIS

No ceasefire, but SA wins substantive rights measures in the Gaza genocide case

The World Court orders that Israel stop killing and harming people in Gaza and that it report provisional measures to the ICJ and South Africa by 26 February.
No ceasefire, but SA wins substantive rights measures in the Gaza genocide case President Cyril Ramaphosa is embraced by the deputy Ambassador of Palestine Bassam Elhussiny at Birchwood Hotel during the the outcome of the International Court of Justice ruling on 26 January, 2024. (Photo: Felix Dlangamandla)

It took International Court of Justice (ICJ) President Judge Joan E Donoghue less than an hour to order a decisive turn in what the Court agreed is the “death and despair” haunting Gaza.

A majority of 15 and 16 judges on a bench of 17 granted most of the measures requested by South Africa to prevent a rising genocide in Gaza and the rest of Palestine. But it stopped short of the most important — ordering a ceasefire in a three-month-long war.

The Court said that while accurate figures are not available, it accepted that the war had caused the deaths of 25,700 people, most of whom are women and children.

More than 63,000 people had been injured, while over 300,000 homes (the majority of Palestinian housing stock) had been destroyed.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Middle East crisis news hub

While the ceasefire request failed, the Court sought to bind Israel’s hands, ground its jets and effectively empty the bullet chambers of its guns with its order. But this is only if Israel accedes to the Court’s order.

The Court ordered Israel to:

  • Take all measures to prevent killings, severe mental and bodily harm, and cease preventing care during births in the (Palestinian) group;
  • Take steps to ensure the military forces do not cause the above acts (this may be tantamount to a ceasefire);
  • Take steps to limit the adverse conditions of life in the Gaza Strip (this is to allow humanitarian aid to flow freely and to stop communications and other blockades); and
  • To submit a report to the Court by 26 February on progress and that this report will be shared with South Africa.

International Relations Minister Naledi Pandor said the effect of the order was tantamount to a ceasefire, but Israel disagreed in first reactions.

Judge Donoghue said the order is binding. The jury is out on whether Israel will accede because it has historically ignored international UN resolutions to stop international humanitarian laws in Palestine.

The order was made to preserve the future rights of Palestinians (once the substantive genocide case is heard) and to stop the ongoing killings and humanitarian disasters unfolding.

The Court agreed with South Africa’s argument that there was a plausible case of genocide to be heard but made it clear in numerous parts of the order that it made no finding on whether there was an ongoing genocide.

Judge Donoghue quoted various heads of UN agencies who found that Israel’s operations were “causing massive civilian casualties and displacement”.

“The court is acutely aware of the extent of the human tragedy and concerned by ongoing loss of life,” said Donoghue in her opening statement.

SA Jurisdiction

By a substantial majority, the ICJ found that South Africa had a prima facie case and jurisdiction to bring the case. Israel had sought to have the case thrown out. The Court agreed there was a dispute between South Africa and Israel. It reaffirmed that a ‘common interest’ in preventing genocide applied from ‘one to all’ parties to the 1948 Genocide Convention, regarding which SA ought to order. Israel argued there was no dispute with South Africa and therefore no legitimate case before the ICJ.

The Court agreed with UN statements that a substantial proportion of Gaza’s two million people would carry lifelong scars and had been impacted by the war now just over 100 days long. It quoted UN agencies who had said: “An entire generation of children is traumatised and will take years to heal”. It also accepted UN data, which showed a looming famine in Palestine, with 93% of people going hungry and most not having access to potable water.

The ICJ also appeared to accept South Africa’s argument on the genocidal intent of Israel. It said that statements by Israeli leaders, including its President Isaac Herzog, dehumanised Palestinians.

The Israeli Attorney-General belatedly announced an investigation into these statements. While welcoming this, the Court said it was still sufficient to conclude that at least some of the rights sought by SA are plausible.

ANC NEC members listen to the outcome of the International Court of Justice ruling on 26 January, 2024, at Birchwood hotel. (Photo: Felix Dlangamandla)
ANC NEC members listen to the outcome of the International Court of Justice ruling on 26 January, 2024, at Birchwood Hotel. (Photo: Felix Dlangamandla)

Ferial’s view

It’s an almost slam-dunk human rights victory for South Africa, which always knew it was unlikely to get a ceasefire. The preventive measures ordered should bring succour to Palestinians still dying in scores every day. It should open up humanitarian corridors because the Court has ordered a short-term return date for a progress report on 26 February. Of course, it may not if Israel decides not to accede.

The most important outcome is the fact that a genocide case will be heard, likely for years. This means Israel’s allies will think several times before supplying arms and turning a blind eye to its human rights abuses.

Impunity is deep in the world, and while the debate will now be on how much effect the court order will have, at least for today, the rights of peace have vanquished the impunities of war. DM

Comments

Alan Salmon Jan 27, 2024, 09:10 AM

I don't agree it is much of a "slam dunk" victory for SA. The court in my opinion has said very little - they say Israel must do all it can to prevent genocide and must provide humanitarian aid - both rather obvious statements. No ceasfire and no finding on whether genocide has been committed - this will follow at some later stage. To me the most important finding which is not mentioned in this report is that Hamas have to immediately release all hostages - it will be interesting to see if they do - very doubtful I think. So in a nutshell, no change in current situation really.

Bill Gild Jan 28, 2024, 01:29 PM

Exactly! SA's case was a legal and moral obscenity, but it did allow for attention to be diverted from the chronically failing ANC government, AND for the Jew-haters to come out in their droves.

mashish Jan 29, 2024, 11:51 AM

Do you miss apartheid this much?

Ben Harper Jan 30, 2024, 06:07 AM

shame, so caught up in the past which you probably never experienced

Harrisingh56 Jan 27, 2024, 09:12 AM

No slam dunk case. You must be on drugs or simply biased. For God’s sake, release the hostages and Ferrial Haffegee never mentions that. I can’t understand why other Islamic states never take Israel to the ICJ, so there must be something for our bankrupt government. All of a sudden, the financial woes of the ANC seems to be resolved, just after the ICJ case. Don’t treat us like fools. Now what about Russia, they ignored the ICJ ruling and what our saintly government is doing about that. Now don’t celebrate like as if the ANC are Human Rights experts. Fix our Water System, electricity , sewage, schools, housing, health care potholes and then concern yourself with Palestine.

niccichristi Jan 27, 2024, 09:33 AM

The ANC needs to seek forgiveness.

mashish Jan 29, 2024, 11:51 AM

What about apartheid israel?

John P Jan 29, 2024, 12:54 PM

Well yes, but not about the ICJ case.

Helmut Straeuli Jan 27, 2024, 09:42 AM

And now for the case against Russia - I'm dreaming of course. But while 'our' legal team is on a roll ...

Donald Moore Jan 27, 2024, 10:03 AM

I don't understand why you, Ferial, and none of the South African comments on this judgement that I have read and heard include a reference to the Court having called on the armed groups to release the hostages they are still holding. For comment to be legitimate it must be balanced.

Bryan Shepstone Jan 27, 2024, 10:12 AM

Will we move on to saving Ukrainians now? ?

mashish Jan 29, 2024, 11:52 AM

Nato is doing that, the wrong way as they know more than us.

alastairmgf Jan 27, 2024, 10:12 AM

Oh Feriel. I know you are trying to put on a brave face and pretend this is a big victory for South Africa, but it’s not. You know it’s not, your readers know it’s not and even the international mainstream media are not calling it that. The biggest thing SA wanted was a ruling that called for a ceasefire and they did not get it (thank goodness). All the rest is just chafe in the wind. Orders that Israel are ALREADY obeying. The war can continue and Hamas can be destroyed. It’s a hollow victory indeed.

John P Jan 29, 2024, 06:22 PM

You honestly believe that Israel has been in compliance with this directive? “Take all measures to prevent killings, severe mental and bodily harm, and cease preventing care during births in the (Palestinian) group; Take steps to ensure the military forces do not cause the above acts; Take steps to limit the adverse conditions of life in the Gaza Strip (this is to allow humanitarian aid to flow freely and to stop communications and other blockades); and To submit a report to the Court by 26 February on progress and that this report will be shared with South Africa.”

Ben Harper Jan 30, 2024, 06:09 AM

Yes John, absolutely and it's well documented. Not one single statute has been broken by Israel

John P Jan 30, 2024, 08:27 AM

Indiscriminate bombing of civilian infrastructure, destruction of hospitals and mosques, the death and injury of thousands of civilians including children. But according to you Israel has done no wrong.

Ben Harper Jan 31, 2024, 08:08 AM

Again you choose to ignore the statutes, treaties and laws, any facilities used by combatants to further their objectives immediately lose their protected status and become legitimate military targets. What proof do you have the bombing is indiscriminate? Sure you're not referring to the 18,000 plus unguided, crude rockets fired by Hamas at Israel? I don't see any condemnation of Hamas for failing to protect it's people - oh wait, they don't and the have openly stated they want their people to be martyred. So no, Israel has done no wrong, it has exercised it's right as a sovereign nation in protecting its land and it's people as every nation should

Sydney Kaye Jan 27, 2024, 10:23 AM

I have read the judgement and find your interpretation of it rather parochial to say the least and does not reflect the weight in it. Saying the victory was a slam dunk EXCEPT for the cease fire order is disengenuous when that provision was the ANC central demand, necessary to assist Hamas, and saying SA didn’t expect to get it is patently untrue. Your headline is misleading (to be polite) and clearly designed to condition your readers for the narrative to follow. It says “The World Court orders that Israel stop killing and harming people in Gaza”, when in fact what it said was “Israel should take all measures to prevent killing etc ” , which is entirely different. It certainly is not tantemount to a cease fire order as our minister hopefully suggests. It is rather like a judge acquitting an accused murderer and adding “but don’t kill anyone in the future “. Similarly Israel is likely to say that the other orders are moot because they are doing them anyway. The ANC can claim victory and get a lift for a day or two ( like the RWC), the effect of the stunt will fade, the matter will be buried deeper than a Zuma trual, and SA will be left with its card well and truly marked.

alastairmgf Jan 27, 2024, 03:30 PM

Well said

Kanu Sukha Jan 29, 2024, 03:25 AM

Thank you referee Sidney for your lesson on semantics and showing us the red card we deserve! It takes the genius of people like you, to lift us 'previously disadvantaged' morons, out of our stupidity.

Ben Harper Jan 29, 2024, 01:17 PM

Aw Redwood, triggered again?

Allan Wolman Wolman Jan 27, 2024, 10:31 AM

The upshot of this issue is that any terrorist organization is given the green light to kill, rape and mutilate at will with no ‘international’ recourse. This could stop in a heartbeat – return our hostges many of whom are being raped daily!

adelegrub Jan 27, 2024, 11:46 AM

Israel is as genocidal as Hamas are boy scouts. SA is supporting a terror organization that fights from within its people, inviting civilian deaths. You think u are bring virtuous. You are not. What an upside down world! What an upside down world.

Ben Harper Jan 29, 2024, 01:18 PM

But, is that not what the anc has always done, hide amongst their people and then kill them when they don't toe their line?

minnaar Jan 27, 2024, 11:56 AM

The gloating and irrational, superficial comments by most commentators is depressing. The coldbloodedness is even more so. More than 27 000 people killed!

Ben Harper Jan 30, 2024, 06:09 AM

So?

John P Jan 30, 2024, 08:29 AM

What an infantile response

Marcus Beijer Jan 27, 2024, 12:18 PM

And when will the ANC be taken to court by the people of SA! Why? Under the ‘leadership’ of the ANC the bigger part of the people of SA have their quality of live been taken away by mismanagement and corruption on a grand scale. So, I ask myself how can you claim to be worried about the Palestinian people if you totally ignore the plight of your own people in your own country?

Dietmar Horn Jan 27, 2024, 12:23 PM

Here is an example of professional, fact-based and unbiased reporting from an international media: The International Court of Justice (ICJ) has not ordered an end to Israel's military operation in the Gaza Strip. However, in its decision, the highest UN court called on Israel to curb death and destruction. South Africa had asked the UN's highest court to order Israel to end its military operation in the Gaza Strip. The court previously announced that it would not dismiss South Africa's genocide case against Israel. The Israeli government had requested that the South African lawsuit be dismissed. The court has not yet ruled on whether the actions in the Gaza Strip constitute genocide - a decision on the matter could take years. ICJ President Joan E. Donoghue said the 17-judge panel concluded it had jurisdiction and therefore could not dismiss the case. The war resulted in many civilian casualties, widespread destruction of civilian infrastructure and the displacement of an overwhelming majority of the coastal area's population, Donoghue said. "The court recognizes the scale of the human tragedy unfolding in the region and is deeply concerned by the ongoing loss of life and human suffering." At the same time, the Court made it clear that Israel's actions in Gaza follow the barbaric terror of October 7th, and recalled that Hamas is also bound by international humanitarian law and must finally release all hostages.

Ben Harper Jan 29, 2024, 01:20 PM

The fact there is still a Gaza today is evidence enough that no such genocide is taking place

dov Jan 27, 2024, 12:23 PM

I am used to my posts being rejected. Possibly for being too pro-Jewish. Deliberately not saying too pro-Israeli. Ok, once more into the breach. I just wonder should the next election go the way many people hope, whether the pro Hamas stance of the ANC will survive, and with that the future of an unwanted legal morass.

Con Tester Jan 27, 2024, 12:26 PM

This article reflects a distinctly tendentious, myopic, and Panglossian reading of the ICJ's judgement. It even descends into manifest misrepresentation of what the ICJ actually ruled! What a farce. The *only* "victory"--if one can even call it that--for SA is that the ICJ ruled that SA indeed has standing to bring the case. The court didn't even reprimand Israel for its Gaza actions in any serious way, but of course our ANC bigwigs are all starry-eyed, declaring it a "major victory" because they think that doing so lends them a sheen of credibility and moral rectitude. Only low double-digit IQ contemplation is required to see that the ICJ actually showed our government a rather substantial toffee.

Bill Gild Jan 28, 2024, 01:32 PM

Exactly.

docb Jan 27, 2024, 01:15 PM

I was contemplating subscribing to DM but this one sided article which deliberately omits ruling about hostages (I wonder if Hamas still has any left alive) has made me rethink this

David Mitchley Jan 28, 2024, 03:30 PM

Defending the truth - I think not. Have often thought of joining DM, but when I see “unbiased reporting” like this makes me glad I have only thought about it.

ZA Patriot Jan 27, 2024, 01:20 PM

Israel killed 1% of Palestinians in 3 months. That’s like killing 3 million Americans or 600 000 South Africans in 3 months. It is absolutely a genocide when 80% of those deaths were women and children. Lots of whataboutism about Russia, the ANC and everything else rather than Israel’s indiscriminate killings. This is why the DA won’t win anything, they and their supporters are blinded to the plight of the down trodden. Well done to our country for being on the right side of history.

Ben Harper Jan 29, 2024, 06:07 AM

Hahahahaha

Peter Oosthuizen Jan 29, 2024, 07:15 AM

You really should try using copy and paste - do you really think the death of 20 000+ people of any belief or ethnicity is a joke? Nobody has defended Hamas' actions in killing innocents and taking hostages but laughing behind a pseudonym does you no credit.

John P Jan 29, 2024, 09:47 AM

Well said

mashish Jan 29, 2024, 11:54 AM

Well said

mashish Jan 29, 2024, 11:54 AM

Well said

Ben Harper Jan 29, 2024, 01:24 PM

No one has defended Hamas' actions in killing innocents? Really? You sure about that? You might want to check with your more rabid buddies on that, those that have called it lies, propoganda and even Israel did it themselves to make Palestine look bad. And on top of that the numpty in the OP boils it all down to this being why the DA won't get voted. The comment is worthy of nothing more than a laugh as that's exactly what it is - Laughable

Eulalie Spamer Jan 27, 2024, 01:45 PM

As descendants of Abraham both Jews and Muslims have a historic birthright to the land of Palestine. During WW I Britain sought the aid of the Arabs through their spiritual and political leader to put paid to Ottoman control of the area and promised their people sovereignty over their Holy sites once victory was gained. With the horse trading involved when the Middle East was carved up after WWI under the infamous Sykes-Picot agreement, Britain reneged on its promise to the Arab population and under their mandate to govern the region in 1948 drove the indigenous population out of their ancestral homes and lands to provide a solution to what was shamefully described as THE JEWISH PROBLEM after the Holocaust and the Diaspora. The Muslim were given the West Bank but permitted hostile Jewish settlers to occupy the land. They also created a vast Concentration Camp which was Gaza where air, sea and land access to the strip was co trolled by the IDF. This has lead to historic grievances which have still not been addressed and in fact Israel is given the means to continue their military control of the area thanks to the US who generously fund Israel and then get their money back by means of a very lucrative arms trade. The thoroughly odious ANC government possibly with the aid of equally egregious regimes, sent an impressive team of human rights lawyers to challenge the conduct of Israel and its allies in 70 years of appalling human rights abuses. Well done Team SA.

Ben Harper Jan 30, 2024, 06:13 AM

Wow, where did you get that blurb from? The back of a Chappies wrapper?

PJ R Jan 27, 2024, 02:25 PM

I thought this was all about human rights. All I see is "Win for SA, SA vindicated, SA pat themselves on the back.. etc..." Well bloody done, now put your money where your mouth is. FIX PIT TOILETS AT SCHOOL.

Kenneth FAKUDE Jan 28, 2024, 08:08 AM

The pit toilets will cost more than having a borehole and running toilets, mark my words we have seen it before.

mashish Jan 29, 2024, 11:55 AM

The lives of Palestinian's are more important than your toiletry needs

Ben Harper Jan 29, 2024, 01:26 PM

How so. What does Palestine do for the average South African? What has Palestine ever done to contribute to the upliftment of South Africans and South African children to be precise? And please don't give is the tired old apartheid claptrap, it's boring and nonsense

mashish Jan 29, 2024, 02:17 PM

We Africans were raised with the policy of Batho Pele principles and Ubuntu, something which colonisers knows nothing about

Ben Harper Jan 30, 2024, 06:14 AM

Riiight, the all encompassing "ubuntu" that's as real as a 3 Rand note

namuma.mulindi Jan 27, 2024, 02:39 PM

X

Richard Blake Jan 27, 2024, 03:00 PM

Congratulations to Naledi Pandor and the ANC. Now does the minister Naledi Pandor have a court date for Ukraine?

Kanu Sukha Jan 29, 2024, 03:48 AM

I thought you and your ilk that are so outraged ... that you would take the initiative to do so ? Sorry ... now I remember that only 'states' may do so ... and I assume you don't qualify for that status ?

Lisbeth Scalabrini Jan 27, 2024, 03:13 PM

Just as a kind of margin note: Does anyone remember The Munich massacre? A terrorist attack carried out during the 1972 Summer Olympics in Munich, West Germany, by eight members of the Palestinian militant organization Black September, who cold-blooded killed two members of the Israeli Olympic team, and took nine others hostage.

Ben Harper Jan 29, 2024, 06:20 AM

It took them 16 years but they got every single one of them

Peter Oosthuizen Jan 29, 2024, 07:17 AM

Laudable and they didn't resort to killing innocent bysatnders who had nowhere to go.

Ben Harper Jan 31, 2024, 08:11 AM

Oh there were a couple of mistaken targets

John P Jan 29, 2024, 01:57 PM

And without indiscriminate bombing of civilians, something Netanyahu should refer to.

Ben Harper Jan 30, 2024, 06:23 AM

Ah but the perpetrators weren't hiding under schools and hospitals and firing thousands of rockets into Israel - 12,000 in the first 3 months of the conflict and tens of thousands in the preceding months and years

tony.fish Jan 27, 2024, 04:30 PM

A deafening silence in the article about the court order to release all the hostages.

Kenneth FAKUDE Jan 27, 2024, 04:47 PM

Is there someone sorting the moderation freeze or an email please, second time I am frozen without explanation.

Con Tester Jan 28, 2024, 10:39 AM

No, DM's communal moderation model is sorely deficient, especially when lots of people are commenting. On posting, a commenter is required to moderate at least three comments, but--and this is where things go awry--each comment needs at least three separate approvals, which means that if a commenter moderates only three comments, s/he's effectively only moderating one because two other commenters are required to do the same. Ergo, it's no wonder that the moderation queue gets gummed up. DM either needs to increase the number of comments each commenter moderates, or relax its criteria for what gets sent to the moderation queue and allow some comments to be approved automatically, as was done in the recent past. For now, commenters can and should opt to "Moderate more comments" as a stopgap while DM hopefully gets its act together. When posting, I moderate comments until I get a "No more comments" message in an effort to move things along, and it would help greatly if others did likewise.

David Mitchley Jan 28, 2024, 03:25 PM

Yes, agree that it would be great to get feedback as to why a particular post is rejected

Jeff Robinson Jan 27, 2024, 06:30 PM

I am totally for the liberation of Palestine, but COMPLETELY AGAINST any action taken in the name of jihad. What chills me deeply is how often I hear child victims being called ‘martyrs’ as if they willingly accepted death or horrible injury. A question which I think Minister Pandor and our president should have to answer unequivocally is: If you have influence with the Hamas upper echelon, would you ask them to surrender? If Israel were to then carry on with its decimation of Gaza, that would definitely be genocide as well as a definite indication that Hamas is putting fellow Palestinians first and not its notion of divine sanction. Please let us not ignore the role of religious delusion on both sides in this war – children of Abraham killing children of Abraham. The evolution of our species still has a long way to go.

Just another Comment Jan 27, 2024, 07:34 PM

Ai, Ferial. Really?

laure Jan 27, 2024, 07:49 PM

This article is a disappointing attempt to depict SA's outcome from the ICJ as a victory. I am dismayed that a reputable media platform like Daily Maverick published this. Israel remains in the same position as before the ICJ's verdict, which merely ordered them to implement measures to prevent genocide, something they were already doing with evidence. The verdict essentially reminded Israel of the terms of the Genocide Convention, with no ceasefire or acknowledgment of genocidal intent. In fact, Hamas was ordered to release hostages immediately, and non-compliance would give Israel more reason to continue the war. It's laughable that the ANC celebrates this as a victory, showcasing their disillusioned approach to the matter.

ALAN PATERSON Jan 27, 2024, 08:52 PM

After this rather damp squib I wonder if Iran will ask for a refund from Naledi et al?

dexmoodl Jan 28, 2024, 01:12 AM

To pro Israeli narrative commentators i would suggest look up what Israeli legal experts think of the ruling , and not politicians either theirs or ours. Also articles in International Law journals . Has no one wondered why the Israeli judge voted yes on 2 points .

modise.moeletsi1956 Jan 28, 2024, 05:58 AM

Credit where credit is due, this was a brave move by Ramaphosa and his cabinet. No other country was willing to call out Israel on its inhumane actions out of fear of reprisals from its powerful Western allies. But SA did not look the other way, instead we stood up for the rights of the Palestinian people. Well done by our government.

J G Jan 28, 2024, 08:42 AM

If the South African ANC were serious about preventing genocide and not just politely grandstanding to the world, they would have called for the Palestinian backed Hamas army to release all the hostages and lay down their weapons. This action would immediately protect the population of Gaza from further bloodshed and more infrastructure destruction. Hamas are hoping to stop this eventual outcome, as it has always done in the past, by getting countries like South Africa to stop the war. Let's not forget who started this conflict and their ideologies.

Ben Harper Jan 29, 2024, 06:25 AM

The court ruling actually orders Hamas to release all hostages immediately, something the DM Pro Hamas Squad all conveniently overlook, that single part of the order would end the conflict, it's what Israel's objective have been all along. Instead the lackeys gloat over nothing as the court has pretty much told Israel to continue doing as you're doing now and refuse to even mention the one single part of it that offers the possibility of ending the conflict. Does anyone honestly think Hamas will accept the ICJ ruling? Of course they won't.

takandel Jan 28, 2024, 08:44 AM

My thought on SA going to the IJC is this, in our country, nothing is being said about the violence against the farmers, who let's be honest here, are mostly white. Nothing is done or said about the racial quotas business, nothing is said about the fact that people are starving day by day, nothing is said about the influx of foreigners from all over africa into this country, which is also my country by the way. Makes me feel like the pot calling the kettle black, is the only thing that can really be said. I am 56 years old, and am certainly not a racist, and have never felt inclined to be one, I educate children of color exclusively. I've spoken to many old (80) and up persons, about this country as it stands, and they're speaking in one voice, it's a disaster, as they all remember their parents and themselves having jobs, having homes, having food, having schooling that operated effectively. Now, don't get me wrong, the "apartheid" bones that are regularly dragged from the grave, which is currently as active mind you with all races in this country, was and never will be a good thing. And, until that favorite blame is stopped, nothing good will come from anything in this country. Too many secrets are kept about the massive corruption and self enrichment going on, and too many false promises are being made, only to garner votes, too many food parcels are being handed out in order to bribe voters to vote for one party, which is very effective, as their is great hunger out there. Only for those to find out after making their mark, that what was promised, never comes. A constant game of promises, lies, theft and corruption. So, to the current ruling party in this once beautiful, prosperous and safe country, clean up your own act, before pointing fingers at other countries and peoples, and mind your own bloody business.

Temba Morewa Jan 28, 2024, 09:08 AM

BS! The only additional action on Israel is that the now need to produce a report. Everything else were required as a signatory to the treaty. Why do journalist not report the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth?

beecee.macpherson Jan 28, 2024, 09:19 AM

South Africans will now live in hope that Israel makes a case before the ICJ to halt the genocide in South Africa against women of all races and the genocide against White South African farmers.

John P Jan 29, 2024, 10:04 AM

Please look up the meaning of "genocide"

Ben Harper Jan 31, 2024, 08:12 AM

you might do well to refresh your memory on it too

Allan Wolman Wolman Jan 28, 2024, 10:47 AM

The upshot of this issue is that any terrorist organization is given the green light to kill, rape and mutilate at will with no ‘international’ recourse. This could stop in a heartbeat – return our hostges many of whom are being raped daily! This site won’t allow web links but try web search using the normal https… then insert saturday-october-seven dot com , warning very graphic content of the barbarity of the attack on us 10/7

Brian Doyle Jan 28, 2024, 11:21 AM

Unfortunately in South Africa hundreds are dying daily and this has been happening for many years. ANC government should concentrate their money and efforts to sort out our own problems. We are South Africa, not Palestine, and even though one does not like the killings that are happening both in Palestine and Israel, it must be remembered the Hamas Miuslim terrorists started the action

Dellarose Bassa Jan 29, 2024, 04:58 PM

Correction. Our money, NOT ‘their money.

Stephen Paul Jan 28, 2024, 12:21 PM

I am, I hope like many of the Commentators here, a D M Insider. This article is an affront and an insult to professional journalism in which we put our trust with D M., and an insult to its readers. It not only grievously factually misrepresents the content of what it does say but also what it does not say. I do not have to comment as most of what is obvious to anyone who has properly read the court ruling is already well stated in the majority of Comments. Most object to the lack of integrity. It is now only beholden to the Daily Maverick to discipline Ms Haffajee and apologise to it's readers for this travesty of acceptable journalism.

dexmoodl Jan 28, 2024, 02:24 PM

my post still in moderation( 2 days ) but Karen Maughan article on another SA news site picked up some of my comments on the ruling . Hopefully this passes.

g Jan 28, 2024, 02:56 PM

Not Ferial’s best article. One sided and hence inaccurate. Strange. I thought she was better than this.

Ben Harper Jan 29, 2024, 06:27 AM

Was being the operative word

dexmoodl Jan 28, 2024, 03:33 PM

It seems a Jewish Zionist Israeli Judge Barak kept his faith from influencing his judgement on the rulings . But to have a Christian Zionist to use her faith in her rulings is ironic ( Uganda Judge Sebutinde - Christian Life Ministries -Uganda ) .

raymond schur Jan 28, 2024, 04:01 PM

The article does not mention that Hamas is required to release all the hostages.

Markgelman.ct Jan 28, 2024, 08:39 PM

There was no order of a ceasefire, because the ICJ recognises that this war is a legitimate act of defence against the brutal aggression of Hamas on October 7, as well as the continual and ongoing indiscriminate rocket attacks that originate from Gaza. No reasonable human being wishes for the continuation of this or any other war or celebrates the loss of a single life. The court recognises that a major justification for the continued actions of Israel is in the obligation a government has to protect its citizens and free those that are held in captivity and raped on a daily basis. By calling for the immediate release of these hostages, the complicity of Hamas in the continuation of this war is finally spoken aloud on the world stage. We are finally reminded that this is a war in response to an unspeakable aggression, with an objective, and there are two parties who have agency in how those objectives are met. There was not a single specific act identified or mentioned. The provisional measures and orders, were merely a general statement of the obvious and pre-existing expectations placed on Israel to act within the confines of international law, which it does and will. And the requirement to report and be scrutinised on this, will give a globally recognised framework by which to be further legitimised. The notion that the “steps” to be taken, forbid the continuation of the war, with the potential for civilian death, is tragically a manipulative distortion aimed at I am not sure who? Further sewing the seeds of expectations that will not be met, such as South Africa emerging as the big peace maker of the world. Similarly, by accepting jurisdiction to hear the case, a framework is provided by which to be cleared of this charge, however costly this proves to be in terms of time, resources and distraction, and the further divisions sewn by biased and distorted reporting as exampled by the above article. The orders were directed at Israel alone, because the Palestinians lack a credible leadership to which similar cautions may be addressed, having elected a terror organisation as their leadership who couldn’t care less about international law. What point would there be to order the cessation of rocket attacks, themselves unambiguously indiscriminate in their intent? What point would there be to order Hamas to not impede the flow of civilians away from targeted areas? To allow aid to reach its intended civilian recipients and not end up stockpiled in tunnels? To step down from its position of appropriating the entire territory of Gaza, under the guise of leadership, to wage a futile and costly war of annihilation against Israel that has precluded any semblance of progress towards autonomy and state-building for the Palestinians? The actions of October 7 do not require a careful examination to be recognised as war crimes, or simply as crimes, since these actions do not deserve to be even partly shielded behind a cloak of war. These were acts of rape, torture, mutilation and execution that have become a footnote to every article – the 1400 that must be mentioned as a duty to maintain some illusion of balance, before laying into Israel. So no, this is not a victory, for anyone really. It is a sideshow. I would applaud any meaningful effort, to bring an end to this war. Where is South Africa’s attempt to negotiate for the release of hostages, given their relationship with Hamas? Where is the sincerity in the condemnation of the horrific atrocities of October 7, when seen alongside the cosying up to Hamas – receiving delegations and the like? Where is anything of any substance? A great amount of attention has now been given to a process that will achieve nothing positive but will have negative unintended consequences. Organisations like Hamas will feel legitimised and emboldened. Israel will be further vilified, further isolated, and less able to see ways towards peaceful settlements that feel sufficiently secure for its citizens. They will wear the heavy mantle of those accused of genocide until eventually cleared – much as a man’s life may be ruined by the charge of rape, even when he is eventually shown to be innocent. These consequences have not been considered. What seems to irritate many other respondents too, is just the dissonance of seeing our politicians enjoy this limelight. Our politicians who cannot oversee a single conviction after our country has been stripped bare by state capture. Our politicians under whose watch this country collapses a little more each day. As a final comment, Gaza has been described by many as the biggest open-air prison in the world. These people have obviously not driven past Du Noon or Khayelitsha lately. Huge swathes of our population exist in true open-air prisons. They are prisoners of the economic hopelessness perpetrated on this country by an inability to lead and serve, by a corrupt and self-interested party. People are right to feel aggrieved that a complex and remote geopolitical situation, receives more attention and warrants live television posturing by our cardboard cutout state president, while the majority of our own population live out their dismal existences in conditions far worse than those experienced in Gaza. Hypocrites. Release hostages. Hamas surrender and disarm. Ceasefire.

Graeme de Villiers Jan 29, 2024, 11:15 AM

You win the internet for sure. Great post.

Middle aged Mike Jan 29, 2024, 01:49 PM

Hear hear.

anton kleinschmidt Jan 29, 2024, 02:31 PM

Bravo

Stephen Paul Feb 2, 2024, 02:39 PM

I have only seen this comment now. Amongst all the noise it is probably the most intelligent one posted on this thread.

Stephen Paul Feb 2, 2024, 02:39 PM

I have only seen this comment now. Amongst all the noise it is probably the most intelligent one posted on this thread.

olof.ribbing Jan 28, 2024, 08:49 PM

If this was a slam dunk victory for SA, how would it had been if SA had turned in Putin to the court? He didn't trust the ANC leadership to be the spineless cowards they are, so he didn't give you the chance. Instead SA has provided Putin with a diversion from Russia's intended ongoing genocide in Ukraine, and as it seems delivered weapons to do it.

John P Jan 29, 2024, 10:17 AM

The ICJ certainly does not recognise this ""war" as a "legitimate act of self defense." No ceasefire order could be made, that would require both parties to be bound by a ruling from the ICJ.

Ben Harper Jan 30, 2024, 06:27 AM

How ion EARTH did you come to that conclusion? That's really reaching

John P Jan 30, 2024, 08:32 AM

Just factual

Ben Harper Jan 31, 2024, 08:14 AM

In what way?

Tony Gomes Jan 28, 2024, 09:21 PM

What a mess. ANC proved nothing. Israel must and will continue the counter-offensive. Show the ANC how a real govt reacts to attacks against its people. Hamas' stated aim is the elimination of Israel. We would have had a much beter case if we took Hamas and Palestine to court on the same charges. The fact that Israel strikes harder than Hamas is irrelevant. I promise you that if Hamas could reverse the kill ratio they would.

Husky310. Jan 29, 2024, 07:07 AM

Does God say He curses those that curse Israel and He blesses those who bless Israel…….Derek Prince mentions this…I wonder how ANC will do in the next election. I suspect they just blew both feet off with a howitzer

Middle aged Mike Jan 29, 2024, 11:02 AM

Would be fantastic if our care bear of a prez could raise the same level of effort to stop the rampant civil rights abuses enabled by his appointees in our country. 70 south africans murdered every day doesn't even seem to raise his pulse

malopedavi Jan 29, 2024, 11:58 AM

It is painfully heartening for a country to experience such mass loss of its civilians at the hands of those who have economic interests in it . I suggests the global countries who witnessed this genocide can unite against this kind of behavior from those who have resources to manipulate them .

Derick Strauss Jan 30, 2024, 12:31 PM

Now that the whole world acknowledge that UNWRA was captured by Hamas in exactly the same way the ANC cadres the South African Revenue services and the Tender system: Is it still a diplomatic victory? Was there really any gain for the ANC? It was not SA that brought the case before the ICJ but the ANC. The state capture narrative will stick to the ANC and eventually destroys them from the inside. It is the international banking system that hold the key to ANC financing. And who control the international banking system? ANC - Prepare yourselves for a huge exposé.

Pieter van de Venter Jan 30, 2024, 03:35 PM

What a convenient Hamas tinted view. Hopefully, this joy will fill your bellies and keep the roof over your heads when the retribution is handed out and we become Zimbabwe on steriods - economically.

Rafique Ismail Jan 30, 2024, 05:43 PM

DONT TRAMP ON A LIONS TAIL, WITHOUT A LOADED GUN, OR ROBUST SUPPORT FROM BIG POWERS! WELL DONE RSA , FOR YOUR HONOURABLE STANCE AGAINST INJUSTICE, BUT TAKE COGNIZANCE OF DIRE ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES THAT POTENTIALLY WILL CRIPPLE, NOT THE ANC GOVERNMENT, BUT ITS POOR PEOPLE. SOUTH AFRICA CONTRIBUTES ONLY ABOUT 0.5% OF THE ECONOMY. JUST A MERE DROP!!

Stephen Paul Feb 2, 2024, 03:06 PM

"HONOURABLE STANCE AGAINST INJUSTICE" = Being baled out of liquidation by Iran. Who else would it be ? I trust D M is on to this miracle with the same journalistic zeal it has shown to portray that S A won a great victory at the ICJ. BTW just a side bar to say, with appropriate shout out to those with sight disabilities, we can read your comment without CAPITALS.

Con Tester Feb 2, 2024, 03:45 PM

Actually, longstanding common Internet protocol dictates that writing in all-caps is the typed equivalent of shouting in someone's face. However, that may well have been the intention, given the message's contents.

Stephen Paul Feb 2, 2024, 04:04 PM

Understood. Personally I could do without being shouted at in my face as the louder you talk the less the actual communication. :-)