Dailymaverick logo

South Africa

This article is more than a year old

MIDDLE EAST CRISIS

Judge Dikgang Moseneke to help preside over South Africa’s contentious genocide case against Israel at ICJ

Former Deputy Judge President Dikgang Moseneke has been appointed to join the 15 regular judges of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in hearing South Africa's case against Israel's military assault on Gaza - a step closer to determining if it constitutes genocide.
Judge Dikgang Moseneke to help preside over South Africa’s contentious genocide case against Israel at ICJ Former deputy chief justice Dikgang Moseneke. (Photo: Gallo Images / Alet Pretorius)

Former deputy judge president Dikgang Moseneke has been appointed as an ad-hoc judge to join the 15 regular judges of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) later this month when it hears South Africa’s application for Israel’s military assault on Gaza to be declared as genocide.

Moseneke will be on the bench when the court decides on whether or not to order Israel to cease its attacks on Gaza as a provisional measure, pending the later determination on whether its actions contravene the Genocide Convention.

Clayson Monyela, spokesperson for the Department of International Relations and Cooperation (Dirco) confirmed to Daily Maverick that Moseneke had agreed to hear the case. 

“Under Article 31, paragraphs 2 and 3, of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, a State party (#SouthAfrica🇿🇦) to a case before the #ICJ which does not have a judge of its nationality on the Bench may choose a person to sit as judge ad hoc in that specific case,” he said.

“Accordingly, SA has approached Justice Dikgang Moseneke, who has agreed to join the other ICJ judges on the bench and hear our case against Israel.”

Monyela also noted that Dire Tladi, the former Dirco law adviser and University of Pretoria law professor, would start his tenure as an ICJ judge in February.

Read more in Daily Maverick: Middle East crisis news hub

Under ICJ rules, a country may not have more than one judge on the bench at a time. Legal sources said this probably means that Moseneke will only hear the first part of the Israel case, the decision on the provisional measure which should be settled by the end of January or soon after.

They said Moseneke would then probably stand down as Tladi would take his place on the bench alongside the 14 other regular judges to hear the substantive part of the Israel case. It is not clear if this means Tladi was elected to the ICJ by the UN General Assembly last year,

Israel has vehemently denied that it is committing genocide in Gaza and has accused South Africa of aiding and abetting Hamas by bringing the case to the ICJ. DM

Comments (10)

j.s.coetzee2@gmail.com Jan 6, 2024, 09:50 AM

Double standards I would say...what about Russia and Ukraine

malherbelaw@vodamail.co.za Jan 6, 2024, 10:05 AM

He should rather avail his energy clearing up the backlog of cases on our court rolls - the legal system has all but imploded on the citizens. As for SA prosecuting Isreal - good luck with that. The pathetic NPA failed against a state wrecking criminal like Zuma - Israel will eat them for breakfast.

Iam Fedup Jan 6, 2024, 10:08 AM

He’s going to come up against top British barrister Prof. Malcolm Shaw, who is the lead in Israel’s defence. Anyone care to place a bet on who will win? A corrupt and disrespected fool from South Africa, or a civilised and intelligent man of integrity?

dexmoodley@gmail.com Jan 6, 2024, 01:44 PM

SA lead counsel is John Dugard SC , look him up. No matter whether SA win or lose . South African legal fraternity wins. The team chosen has some of best talent SA has produced , and includes one Irish KC and a Oxford Professor .

louw.nic Jan 6, 2024, 04:35 PM

I truly hope that the lawyers are representative of the diversity of South Africa

g “Amanzi” k Jan 7, 2024, 01:14 AM

Lol, the Irish person doesnt sound local to me. Lets hope BEE is followed.

herms1982@gmail.com Jan 6, 2024, 10:22 AM

South Africa is a international sitcom?

Middle aged Mike Jan 6, 2024, 10:43 AM

This is quite clearly a pre-election diversionary stunt on the part of the ANC. The idea that they might act out of principle is laughable.

louw.nic Jan 6, 2024, 04:35 PM

This is the truth, no doubt

dexmoodley@gmail.com Jan 6, 2024, 01:26 PM

Israel Foreign Ministry to all their embassies from a leaked cable on Thursday . " A ruling by the court could have significant implications that are not only in the legal world but have practical bilateral , multilateral , economic , security ramifications . " "We ask for an immediate and unequivocal public statement along the following lines : To publicly and clearly state YOUR COUNTRY rejects the outrageous , absurd and baseless allegations made against Israel ." So far only the US has done so.

Duncan Napier Jan 6, 2024, 04:17 PM

Pre-election ploy by ANC to win the many pro-Palestinian supporters in the Western Cape who normally vote DA. No other reason!

dexmoodley@gmail.com Jan 7, 2024, 12:27 AM

Do people remember Roelf Meyer . Just listened to a interview of his trip Gaza last year , one of many since 2000. From his comments conditions in Gaza was a pressure cooker just waiting to blow. SA government should get his expertise in the current crises.

Middle aged Mike Jan 7, 2024, 08:55 AM

He talked ramaphosa up like he was a walter walker fairly recently. Not sure that he's all that you think he is.

Jehan Bektir Jan 7, 2024, 09:12 AM

Roelf Meyer? Expertise? Wow.

Jehan Bektir Jan 7, 2024, 09:13 AM

Hamas is happy to have found in the ANC a useful idiot. But they have found a useless idiot.

Kenneth FAKUDE Jan 7, 2024, 08:03 PM

Jehan Hamas does not need south Africa the Palestinians do, not even the smartest lawyer can successfully defend Israel,they presented a map at the UN without Palestine, they follow up with genocidal statements and act accordingly,they killed 3 unarmed stripped Israel civilians waving their top clothes asking for help, they then implicate themselves by stating that it was a mistake their military doctrine does not allow the killing of their own civilians but the doctrine is silent on unarmed Palestinian civilians who makes 90% of the area Israel invaded as it's objective target, Israel committed it's self to international law against war crimes their the military doctrine might have been illegal to use in the Gaza invasion and it implicates all those using a doctrine silent on war crimes against the invaded population in an area declared as a war zone by Israel,

Ben Harper Jan 8, 2024, 01:57 PM

Hahahaha

dexmoodley@gmail.com Jan 7, 2024, 09:44 AM

meant knowledge of the region

Stephen Paul Jan 7, 2024, 12:35 PM

I think that both sides would ideally like to see each other eradicated. The difference is that Israel have the means to do so and better defense capabilities. But with great power comes great responsibility. In reality, Israel should focus on their defense capabilities they're always bragging about. With their rationale, I dont see any reason why they would not destroy every last gazan. Its pretty obvious.

Middle aged Mike Jan 8, 2024, 03:43 PM

Israel has the capability to eradicate the populations of both the west bank and gaza if they chose to but they quite clearly have chosen not to. The hamas government of gaza, islamic jihad and hezbollah with the active and open support of iran all wish to eradicate the jews of israel and have tried hard to do so. If they weren’t quite so useless they would certainly have done so.

Nas Hodja Jan 9, 2024, 07:37 PM

Have people read the Hamas Charter? This is an old trope – kill all the Jews. That is not in Hamas’s charter. They want to take apart the Zionist Apartheid Occupier state and make one state free for all it’s people of all faiths. The South African solution. We do not agree that they commit war crimes to achieve this goal, but Israel has committed far more war crimes. Jews have lived in peace and safety in Palestine for over 1000 years under the rule of various Muslim governments (there were a few corrupt rulers who sometimes interrupted the peace). No reason it cannot happen again. Hey, there are Churches and Christians in Gaza, and they also want to be free. Look at the solidarity of the Christian Patriarch of one of the Churches in Gaza who said that he personally would call the Call to Prayer if there were no Mosques and Callers left in the Gaza. Israel would have killed all the Palestinians by now if the international condemnation would not make them a sanctioned pariah state. Recent polls of Israelis have shown that the majority want the genocide to go ahead. They need the free bombs from US, so kill them in steps, and stops and starts. It is not for lack of desire or intent. Unfortunately. The people of Gaza - about 80% lived on the other side of the fence, where imported Jews now live, and they are the Palestinian refugees that represent the most threat to Israel, because they want to return to their homes - on the other side of the fence.

dexmoodley@gmail.com Jan 7, 2024, 04:33 PM

Do Israeli officials not understand the severity of the case , You got Ben Gvir and Smortich making statements that damage the case , Israeli UK Ambassador's Tzipi Hotovely comments in a interview advocating for the total destruction of Gaza all These after the case was lodged . With clients like this how is a lawyer supposed to win.

Kenneth FAKUDE Jan 7, 2024, 09:37 PM

And Dexter whilst pro Israel supporters are playing down the significance of this step by south Africa the OIC a group of 57 Muslim countries who are permanent members of the united nations have endorsed south Africa's action

dexmoodley@gmail.com Jan 7, 2024, 09:51 PM

OIC is a way for Muslim countries to hide behind . OIC has no standing so support is meaningless in this case. If Muslim countries really supported the case they would lodge papers with court only Turkey and Malaysia have done .

Kenneth FAKUDE Jan 7, 2024, 10:22 PM

The support has no bearing on the facts of the case Dex and the evidence brought forward Israel has done all the hard work for south Africa, the support is an indication that 57 eyes who signed to abide by laws preventing crimes against humanity and hold seats in the United nations and European union are saying we see it the same way it's a big deal, only America has supported Israel and they had to it's their bombs committing the crime and their billions