Dailymaverick logo

DM168

This article is more than a year old

PUBLIC SECTOR PAY

Treasury adopts a new approach to rein in bloated public servants' wage bill

Treasury will provide new money to fund pay increases for critical and personnel-heavy professions; others will be funded from departments’ existing budgets.
Treasury adopts a new approach to rein in bloated public servants' wage bill Members of the Public Servants' Association march to Parliament during the civil servants' strike on 10 November 2022 in Cape Town, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / Brenton Geach)

The government has taken a new approach in an attempt to rein in the rising cost of paying public servants: only give increases to frontline and labour-intensive professions. National Treasury has allocated R111.4-billion over the next three years to adjust the pay of public servants in the departments and professions that it deems to be critical, such as education, health, police, defence and correctional services.

It is a step change in how Treasury approaches remuneration in the state. In previous years, all public servants, regardless of which department they worked in, would be in line to receive a pay rise.

Of the R111.4-billion pencilled in by Treasury, about R24-billion will immediately go towards helping to fund pay increases of 7.5% for public servants in the current fiscal year (2023/24) that it didn’t fully budget for, which left a big hole in public finances.

The balance will go towards remuneration only in personnel-heavy sectors, including health, education and the police service, over the next three years.

Since 2020, Treasury has attempted to implement a pay freeze in the public sector to stabilise the cost of paying SA’s 1.2 million public servants. But it failed to do so as it faced pushback from public sector trade unions, which embarked on several strikes.

Set at R646.4-billion in 2023/24, the cost of paying public servants is the single largest component of government expenditure. It gobbles up 30% of total expenditure of R2.26-trillion in the current fiscal year, crowding out spending on capital projects for future growth as well as items crucial for service delivery. In other words, 30% of the government’s expenditure goes to just 2% of the population (public servants).

Ballooning public sector pay

An analysis by Treasury of public sector pay – contained in the 2023 Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement documents – found that unsustainable pay levels since 2013 have resulted in more public servants moving into higher-earning categories. The number of public servants with annual earnings of more than R1-million has increased from just more than 10,000 in 2013/14 to over 55,000 in 2023/24.

Almost half (48%) of public servants will earn between the annual ranges of R350,001 and R600,000 in 2023/24, Treasury found.

It is struggling to wrestle down the cost of compensation. Its projections show that the cost to remunerate public servants or compensation cost will continue to rise over the next three years, from R646.4-billion in 2023/24 to R720.3-billion in 2026/27.

But Treasury is now intent on limiting above-consumer inflation percentage increases to the pay of public servants, which has been the main driver of the growth in the compensation cost since 2013.

To this end, Treasury is now prepared to allocate new money to frontline and labour-intensive professions. For others, it is increasingly asking provincial government departments to accommodate pay increases from their existing budgets.

However, provinces argued that it would be unfair for the national government to negotiate unaffordable pay increase settlements centrally and then to deny provinces the funds to implement them. Treasury was sympathetic to the argument as it provided partial funding of R17.6-billion for provinces to be able to implement pay increases.

However, a Treasury official told Daily Maverick that asking provinces to bankroll pay adjustments for public servants independently, especially those whose professions are deemed not to be labour intensive, would be the norm in future.

“Departments will be expected to absorb the wage increases within their baselines, including, where necessary, by managing headcounts. The government will assist in managing headcounts, including implementing controls on payroll systems to ensure executive authorities operate within their budgets when creating and filling vacant posts,” said the official.

The labour movement response

Trade unions and federations are divided on Treasury’s new compensation approach.

Reuben Maleka, the general manager of the Public Servants’ Association (PSA), welcomes the allocation of additional money to frontline professions but said Treasury’s insistence on managing headcount (the possible freezing of posts) will harm service delivery.

“These measures will have a negative effect on filling vacancies while there is a critical need to fill such vacancies. Public servants’ capacity is stretched to the limit and this impacts on their ability to render efficient services to citizens,” said Maleka. The PSA claims to represent more than 245,000 public servants.

Matthew Parks, the acting national spokesperson and parliamentary coordinator of labour federation Cosatu, agreed with Maleka. “What it will do is fuel the brain drain of skilled public servants to better paying and less stressful jobs overseas. We should not fall for a reckless narrative that says the public service is bloated. In 1994, we had one million public servants for 34 million South Africans. Today, we have 1.2 million public servants, yet the population has nearly doubled to 62 million,” said Parks.

What might undermine Treasury’s plans to limit above-consumer inflation pay increases is that the two-year compensation agreement it signed with public sector trade unions – running from 2023 to 2024 – will soon end. Maleka said the union “will probably table [pay] demands during the third quarter of the 2024/25 fiscal year”.

Another risk to Treasury’s projections for the money it would allocate over the next three years was the impact of inflation, said Peter Attard Montalto, the managing director of consultancy firm Krutham.

“Wage bill pressures were fully recognised now we are in a two-year agreement, though we think National Treasury marginally underestimates the [wage/pay] bill from next year given higher inflation and in the medium run, given we see some attrition [reduction in headcount as public servants retire and for other reasons],” said Attard Montalto. “As such, through the next three years, we have an extra R23-billion of wage spending.” DM

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R29.

DM168 front page

Comments

Dragon Slayer Nov 6, 2023, 10:06 AM

Until primary education, basic services, public transport, health, and security are delivered effectively throwing money at anything to do with economic and social development is literally wasted, useless and self serving.

Paul (Teacher) Nov 6, 2023, 10:24 AM

The problem isn't merely the public wage bill (although that is part of the problem, of course.) Not mentioned is the armies of consultants and consulting firms - vast, teeming swarms of them - that are appointed at vastly inflated prices to perform tasks of a technical-, managerial- or even administrative nature, which public servants are already employed to perform (and which government used to have to perform itself.) This duplication of payment costs many, many billions every year. (Similar to taxpayers supporting the police, schools, hospitals etc. but then still having to shell out for private armed response, inflated school fees and private medical aid.)

Terry Byrne Nov 6, 2023, 12:31 PM

Totally agree. The "armies" of consultants and consulting firms are cash cows hired to perform the functions that the delinquent and incompetent civil servants should have the skills to perform. Lest we forget Bain & Co and the others.

Rachelle Seymore Nov 6, 2023, 11:14 AM

Inflated public service, inflated number of ministers - and no service delivery. No money, no honesty - and no moral compass. This country is sadly heading for a collapse. The ANC must go!

Hidden Name Nov 6, 2023, 11:50 AM

How on earth do we wind up with a public service which is almost 1% of the country's population!? And MORE than that of the adult population? AND all demanding (and getting) above inflation increases? I mean, the percentage of the population paying income tax is, I believe around 10% (Roughly 7.1 million of a population roughly 70 million) need to submit returns - this means, crudely, that roughly 17% of our tax payer base is paid for by the other 83%. Thats pretty insane.

Hidden Name Nov 6, 2023, 11:52 AM

**Total typo. I meant 17% of the countries tax paying population.

Ben Harper Nov 6, 2023, 01:44 PM

It's a lot smaller than that

Jack Russell Nov 6, 2023, 12:03 PM

Sick and obscene levels of compensation. With a 100% success rate in destroying SOE's that point does not even begin to be arguable....... fun thought to consider how much worse it could get if the EFF got it's fingers into, perhaps into a better word, the state till.

Ludovici DIVES Nov 6, 2023, 12:03 PM

ANC are chasing their tails, they are doomed because they have created a society of entitlement in an attempt to retain a majority voter base and everything is falling apart and the very same voter base has begun to understand the extent to which their leaders have plundered the countries resources and and all the failed promises mad.

Cunningham Ngcukana Nov 6, 2023, 01:43 PM

What are the realities of the South African budget before we go on a tirade of blaming the public service numbers? We have had an economy that has been having an epileptic growth far below even the inflation targets set up by the government. We have a situation of loss of revenue as a result of the electricity problem and the logistics challenge of Transnet. It is very silly and disorderly for anybody to blame this on the public service. Any person with a coefficient of thinking would know that the economy will not grow with the two challenges of electricity and logistics. The estimated loss of revenue from electricity is R100 billion and from the logistics challenge is another R100 billion and the under collection is R56 billion and to blame it on the public service not the ANC government only sick people would do that. People must look at the lost investments because of the electricity and the logistics challenges as a result of corruption and incompetence by the ANC government. The question is whether there are credible plans to deal with these two challenges ought to be part of any plan to deal with the crisis. The answer is that we have a civil engineer who ought to be dealing with pot holes charged with dealing with the issue and is saying a lot of poppy cock on television along with the Minister of Public Enterprises who is adds to the confusion. To cut expenditure without clear plans on energy and logistics by people who tell us they dropped the ball will not help.

Pet Bug Nov 6, 2023, 10:46 PM

In a nutshell is the spice. Your comments are too long. Brevity required.

Ben Harper Nov 7, 2023, 05:25 AM

Hahahahahahahahahaha

Grumpy Old Man Nov 7, 2023, 01:32 PM

Any person with a coefficient of thinking would know that all three things can be true. That is low growth, declining tax revenues & an inefficient & costly Public Service.

Ben Harper Nov 9, 2023, 07:22 AM

What about your organisation? Complicit and actively engaging in tender fraud, bridges built in Limpopo that collapsed mere weeks after completion, massive fraud, theft, money laundering and stealing the pension funds of the most vulnerable in our society! No, your organisation has built absolutely nothing and have contributed absolutely nothing to our society and have left tens of thousands of people worse off than they were with your corruption. No, the eff is a bunch of radicals who only want power and IF they ever get it, they country is well and truly finished. So rather sit down an be quiet.

Brigitte Çhurch Nov 7, 2023, 12:53 PM

Conservation should be included in this. We need field rangers and officers in our protected areas

wardle2066 Nov 7, 2023, 03:06 PM

Serving the public and your fellow countrymen should be a calling. It should be done from a position of passion and loyalty to one's country. It should be the greatest honor bestowed upon you. Should. Now, lets look at South Africa. We know that the ANC cadre deployment is a thing. Hell, they would protect it more than the citizenry. We know the ANC's position is party before country. We know that not all animals are equal in South Africa. I think most of us are smart enough to know where the problem is, and it's not at the lower ranks, or as the doublespeak calls them, frontline and labor-intensive public servants. So what if the ones who in it for self enrichment leave, let them go. This government will always burden the lower ranks to favor the cadres. How many high ranking politically connected public servants have been convicted for state capture. A certain big fish didn't even need to see a jail for contempt, although he cost us dearly. Has anyone seen a scorecard for how well a minister does their work? How does the President preside when he is always jetting abroad? Would a millionaire President voluntarily take a salary cut? Good luck treasury, and I hope you win, but I wouldn't bet on it.

Trevor chandler Nov 8, 2023, 02:34 PM

There are well over 2 million civil servants if all 3 tiers of government are taken into account, so don’t be fooled by selective hyperbole