Key takeaways from 15th BRICS Summit – and the human rights alarm bell ringing over bloc’s new members

Key takeaways from 15th BRICS Summit – and the human rights alarm bell ringing over bloc’s new members
President of Brazil Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, President of China Xi Jinping, President of South Africa Cyril Ramaphosa, Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi and Russia Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov during the 2023 BRICS Summit in Sandton, Johannesburg. (Photo: Gianluigi Guercia / EPA-EFE / Pool) | Graphic background: Vecteezy

China was the biggest winner, Russia was left out over the war in Ukraine, some new BRICS members are authoritarian regimes with little regard for human rights, reforming the United Nations Security Council was a key discussion point, and finance ministers and central bank governors of BRICS nations have been tasked with considering the modalities of trading in local currencies.

1. China is the biggest winner of the 15th BRICS Summit

China’s plan to achieve world dominance has advanced through the introduction of more countries joining the BRICS collective, as it means more opportunities to gain allies and increase trade.

At this point, all BRICS member countries have China as their main trading partner and little trade with each other.

With the addition of the Argentine Republic, the Arab Republic of Egypt, the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) as full members, China has reason to celebrate. This expansion could potentially help it to grow its economy further and strengthen its geopolitical standing in the world.

China also gains by the addition of oil producers Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Iran because this should mean more oil transactions are done in yuan rather than in US dollars, supporting China’s ambition to make the yuan a major global currency.

The UAE and Saudi Arabia, which have strong ties with the US, have slowly started showing interest in building ties with China. Saudi Arabia is China’s biggest supplier of crude oil, and China is the biggest destination of Saudi oil exports, and Beijing mediated an agreement between Iran and Saudi Arabia that could ease Middle Eastern tension.

Saudi Arabia has also announced a $3.6-billion deal to buy 10% of China’s Rongsheng Petrochemical, which will result in it supplying 480,000 barrels per day of crude oil to the company.

China’s President Xi Jinping addresses the media at the Union Buildings in Pretoria after the 15th BRICS Summit in Johannesburg, South Africa. (Photo: GCIS)

2. Controversy hangs over some of the new BRICS members

The introduction of the UAE, Saudi Arabia and Iran as new BRICS member states has raised alarm about the bloc’s stance on human rights issues.

All three countries are authoritarian regimes that have not prioritised the rights and equality of women.

The declaration signed by the five BRICS nations calls for promoting and protecting human rights and fundamental freedoms.

“We agree to continue to treat all human rights, including the right to development in a fair and equal manner, on the same footing and with the same emphasis. We agree to strengthen cooperation on issues of common interests both within BRICS and in multilateral forum including the United Nations General Assembly and Human Rights Council, taking into account the necessity to promote, protect and fulfil human rights in a non-selective, non-politicised and constructive manner, and without double standards. We call for the respect of democracy and human rights,” it reads.

The DA said that, out of the current five members, only South Africa, Brazil and India could be considered democratic states. Extending an invitation to Iran and Saudi Arabia might “tip the scales in favour of an illiberal, oppressive, and autocratic approach to foreign relations and trade”.

The party pointed out that Iran had been helping Russia with weapons throughout the war in Ukraine, which it finds problematic. The DA also criticised Saudi Arabia’s disregard for media freedom.

“The treatment of women in both Iran and Saudi Arabia, for example, represents an affront to South Africa’s steadfast commitment to human rights and gender equality. These countries have incurred global condemnation for their disregard for women’s most basic freedoms – manifested in women’s exclusion from public life and lack of legal rights.

“In addition, the Saudi government’s disdain for media freedom and political tolerance was exposed when journalist Jamal Khashoggi was brutally murdered at their consulate in Istanbul in October 2018. The fact that Iran continues to provide military aid to Russia raises significant questions around the motives behind its admission to BRICS, suggesting a strong influence of Russian interests,” the DA said.

South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa with fellow BRICS leaders during the closing day of the BRICS Summit at the Sandton Convention Centre on 24 August 2023 in Johannesburg, South Africa. (Photo: Per-Anders Pettersson / Getty Images)

3. No support for Russia’s war in Ukraine

Russian Federation President Vladimir Putin used the BRICS platform to blame the war in Ukraine on the West. Putin, who partici­pated in the summit virtually, said “some countries” – a clear reference to the US and other Western countries – were promoting their own hegemony in pursuit of a policy of ongoing colonialism and neocolonialism.

But the other four BRICS leaders who were physically present at the summit – President Cyril Ramaphosa, China’s President Xi Jinping, Brazil’s President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi – did not publicly support his justification in their responses.

In his direct response to Putin, Ramaphosa merely said: “We agree that the war can only be resolved by negotiations, which you have always said you support.”

Activists in Sandton, Johannesburg, use the BRICS Summit to voice their protest against Russia’s war on Ukraine. (Photo: Yeshiel Panchia / EPA-EFE)

In his speech to the summit, Lula said: “We cannot avoid dealing with the main current conflict taking place in Ukraine with global effects.”

He emphasised that “Brazil’s historic stance is to defend sovereignty, territorial integrity and all the United Nations’ purposes and principles” – principles that Russia has clearly violated by invading Ukraine, although Lula did not spell that out.

But he put the conflict in the context of a world order that had shifted over a few years from “a scenario of benign multipolarity towards one that resumes the obsolete mentality of the Cold War and geopolitical competition”.

Modi did not refer to the war in Ukraine at all in his address. Xi also did not refer to it directly, although he said BRICS should cooperate to maintain the momentum of development towards meeting the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals in a period of global turbulence.

In the declaration endorsed by the leaders, concerns are raised about continuing conflicts in many parts of the world.

“We stress our commitment to the peaceful resolution of differences and disputes through dialogue and inclusive consultations in a coordinated and cooperative manner and support all efforts conducive to the peaceful settlement of crises.

“We recall our national positions concerning the conflict in and around Ukraine as expressed at the appropriate fora, including the United Nations Security Council and United Nations General Assembly.

“We note with appreciation relevant proposals of mediation and good offices aimed at peaceful resolution of the conflict through dialogue and diplomacy, including the African Leaders Peace Mission and the proposed path for peace,” it reads.

Russian President Vladimir Putin attends the BRICS Summit via video link from Moscow. (Photo: EPA-EFE / MIKHAEL KLIMENTYEV / SPUTNIK / KREMLIN POOL)

4. Calls to reform global governance structures for UN Security Council

Reforming the United Nations Security Council was one of the key points of discussion. The BRICS declaration endorsed a greater participation of emerging and developing countries in the UN, including its Security Council. However, Russia and China did not explicitly endorse South Africa, Brazil and India being given permanent Security Council seats.

“We support a comprehensive reform of the UN, including its Security Council, with a view to making it more democratic, representative, effective and efficient, and to increase the representation of developing countries in the Council’s memberships so that it can adequately respond to prevailing global challenges and support the legitimate aspirations of emerging and developing countries from Africa, Asia and Latin America, including Brazil, India and South Africa, to play a greater role in international affairs, in particular in the United Nations, including its Security Council,” it reads.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres echoed these sentiments, saying today’s glo­bal governance structures reflected yesterday’s world.

“They were largely created in the aftermath of World War 2 when many African countries were still ruled by colonial powers and were not even at the table,” Guterres said on the final day of the summit.

This was particularly true of the Security Council and the Bretton Woods institutions, he said, referring to the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.

5. No BRICS currency on the cards, but key move towards de-dollarisation

The New Development Bank, the Shanghai-based lender better known as the BRICS Bank, has thrown its weight behind the plan by its founding member countries to push for the use of local currencies to facilitate trade and transactions. Using local currencies for trade and finance to rely less on the US dollar is not new on the agenda of the BRICS bloc.

On Thursday, Ramaphosa said finance ministers and central bank governors of BRICS nations have been tasked with considering the modalities of trading in local currencies.

“The summit agreed to task the BRICS finance ministers and central bank governors, as appropriate, to consider the issue of local currencies, payment instruments and platforms and report back to the BRICS leaders by the next summit,” he said.

President Cyril Ramaphosa announces the outcomes of the 15th BRICS Summit during a media briefing in Sandton, Johannesburg. (Photo: GCIS)

Analysis: Can Ramaphosa defend SA’s constitutional ideals and global human rights?

As I scrolled through this week of jet touchdowns and the heads of state and global leaders in South Africa, there were so many I stopped counting. The most common image of President Cyril Ramaphosa has been of him beaming through the week of the BRICS Summit.

He was in his element, smiling as he welcomed leaders who touched down from dawn to dusk and in meetings that included business forums, BRICS meetings with African leaders and bilateral meetings with China, India and Brazil.

The 26-page Johannesburg Communiqué, which summarised the event, showed progress. BRICS is now BRICS-Plus. Six new countries have won admission, including two from Africa – Ethiopia and Egypt. The group is more significant than the G7 in many ways: together, it is much richer than when the summit started on Tuesday.

The total GDP of the bloc is just over 30% of global GDP; the combined GDP and population are larger than those of the G7. It controls most oil production now, with Saudi Arabia and the UAE admitted this week.

The New Development Bank (or the BRICS Bank in shorthand) will become a huge player as its capitalisation will be increased exponentially by the new member states, especially Saudi Arabia and the UAE.

South Africa has inked energy deals with China to end debilitating power cuts more quickly. It has cemented relations with India and kept Russia online. Russian President Vladimir Putin joined a virtual private network to avoid an International Criminal Court arrest warrant. By persuading him not to attend, South Africa avoided a mess.

India landed the Chandrayaan-3 spacecraft on the moon’s dark side this week, and Wagner boss Yevgeny Prigozhin died as Russian forces reportedly shot down his plane. The big BRICS men were flexing.

Most importantly, Ramaphosa kept the rest of the continent on the agenda, talking up the African Continental Free Trade Area, which could be among the world’s largest free trade zones.

It was a step change for the South African leader. After faltering on the Ukraine war, Ramaphosa allowed hawks in his Cabinet to let loose the Lady R debacle in 2022 (the docking and loading of a Russian ship in Simon’s Town with its identification system switched off) and play war games with Russia in February on the anniversary of the start of the war in Europe.

His reputation, especially with old allies in the West, was battered. But the head of state has been on good form since Sunday’s national address ahead of the BRICS Summit and the state visit by China’s President Xi Jinping. Ramaphosa was a convincing proponent of non-alignment. “We will not be drawn into a contest between global powers,” he said ahead of the summit.

He announced a European Union-SA Summit later in 2023 and hinted that South Africa will still host the Agoa Summit in November. (Agoa is a duty-free access agreement with the US worth US$2.7-billion a year to SA.) A group of US senators want the Agoa Summit moved to a friendlier African country, but South Africa has lobbied hard to keep access to the valuable US market.

South Africa’s speeches throughout the week set out a more innovative multipolar geopolitical strategy. In the Financial Times, Alec Russell said foreign policy is increasingly “à la carte”, meaning that geopolitics aligned to spheres of global superpower influence is rapidly declining.

The political and business leader Mcebisi Jonas, writing in the Daily Maverick recently, said South Africa’s international policy needed to be more nimble and multipolar.

Here’s the flip side, though

The 2022 Democracy Report of the V-Dem Institute in Sweden found that democratic practice has regressed to 1989 levels. Dictatorships are rising; freedom of expression is shrinking.

Protests were held at the BRICS Summit this week (but at a faraway dog park in Sandton) – a red alert for civil society on the effective right to protest.

South Africa is one of a few of the expanded group of 11 BRICS countries where people can protest and one of four with genuinely free media. The BRICS group is not great company from a human rights perspective.

Ramaphosa’s challenge now will be to protect democratic space and practice in BRICS. Other reports show that 70% of the world’s people now labour under forms of autocracy.

On our continent, coups in the Sahel region are the order of the day: there have been seven since 2020, the most recent in Niger. Ethiopia’s Prime Minister, Abiy Ahmed, won a Nobel Peace Prize but is often at war.

From a human rights perspective, the BRICS club is much less attractive than it is as an economics and trade group. Where it does offer heft is to change global financial architecture and global governance, said UN Secretary-General António Guterres, who was also in Johannesburg this week. Ramaphosa will have to be a deft negotiator to hold up the torch for South Africa’s constitutional ideals and global human rights while remaining a linchpin of the BRICS group. – DM

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R29.


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Pagani Paganini says:

    Two wins worth worth mentioning. 1) Understanding the need for the establishment of BRICS is the fact that Global South feel not adequate represented and while continue, they also need to establish their own architecture. Everyone it takes it must be taken. I’m glad all current leaders are in it for it.

    2. Whether you like or or not the likes of DV are the losers and President Ramaohosq’s standings in the country has gobble of the roof. I wonder what poor little Steenhuise will still have a short at the next elections next hear.

    • Pet Bug says:

      I was wondering if you could just relook your comment and edit so that it is understandable.

    • Pet Bug says:

      It’s a great pity and massive missed opportunity all round.
      I’m gutted with the horrific choice of nations.

      An emerging market grouping is so vital to combine common interests and have these presented to world forums.
      The three democracies of present BRICS should have made a point of only considering multi-party democracies with open economies.
      But they were completely bullied by China and Russia to make way for probably the worst three emerging markets out there. Iran (wtf?)!!

      We should be ashamed that Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria, Philippines, and at a push Turkey, were not considered to be far more valuable than Iran, UAE and Saudi Arabia.

      This new cluster f.. is just not fit for purpose to create a common human and uplifting global environment.
      Our constitution certainly does not support hounding of females or authoritarian regimes.

      Our hope is that the ANC loses so that we can redefine our role in this horrid 19th century nationalistic backward cabal.

    • Ben Harper says:

      Can you say that again in English please?

  • André Pelser says:

    The proof of the benefits of BRICS membership will be in the price of the pudding and who the principal beneficiaries will be, bearing in mind the Chancellor House shareholding in the Medupi mess and the fact that the ANC government cadres are thoroughly corrupt.

  • Johan Buys says:

    Consumers should not hold their breath for price relief from cheap oil and gas. The club now includes Saudi, UAE, Russia, Iran and Brazil = basically most of the top ten oil exporters (missing Canada, Norway, Nigeria, Iraq and USA). Our energy prices are regulated, so even if we got half price oil the benefit would not trickle down.

  • David Pennington says:

    Yeah Squirrel it’s all shitz n giggles until Whu Flung Dung parks an aircraft carrier in Table Bay

  • This is a great step towards removing the historical dominace of the west. This virtue signaling about human rights is rather appalling. What is it called when the very same countries have colonized and plundered the resources of the global south? Not just resources, they have continued to fund destabilization of their former colonies in the name of promoting democracy. What about that for human rights? Please allow us to make our own choices and define what works for us!

    • Pet Bug says:

      Dear commentator: you and the ANC have had a generation, that’s give or take 30 years(!), and have made your own choices.
      It didn’t work.
      And won’t work if your ideology, and distaste for self agency to improve your life rests on horrendous future slavery to autocracy.
      It’s your choice.

  • Ken Harley says:

    And there was a beaming Cyril, in the Centre of the BRICS grouping of leaders, holding hands in the pose of an international statesman. What a sad sham. By way of contrast, South Africa once had a genuine international statesman: the now forgotten Jan Smuts. The contrast is deepened if one looks at development within our national borders. Beaming Cyril has been party to the destruction of much of the country’s infrastructure that Smuts put in place a hundred years ago. Eskom and the railways are clear examples. The optics of a Cyril who “shines on the world stage” (DM headline) could hardly be more misleading.

  • Shabir Leylan says:

    Please don’t make an issue of Human Rights while UK, USA and its stooges Australia EU just tow the line of the Mafia like USA
    Time for change is what the addition of BRICS has ushered in
    USA is totally bankrupt and there’s no way it can pay or reduce its deficit even if they came up with new schemes like crypto currency where people put their money as speculators in the hope (dream) that it will increase. SBF proved how greed works and who benefits
    In SA where the ruling ANC has milked the people into a new drought that people are complacent to the point they don’t speak up against the theft and corruption that is ubiquitous
    Electricity is NOT a basic right but water is a universal basic right – both of these are lacking
    Time Safaricans stood up and demanded we have RIGHTS too and BRICS is where we can embarrass our incompetent politicians and cognitively challenged leadership especially Ramaphosa et al.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

home delivery

Say hello to DM168 home delivery

Get your favourite newspaper delivered to your doorstep every weekend.

Delivery is available in Gauteng, the Western Cape, KwaZulu-Natal, and the Eastern Cape.

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.7% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.3% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.3% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country.

Be part of that 0.3%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

MavericKids vol 3

How can a child learn to read if they don't have a book?

81% of South African children aged 10 can't read for meaning. You can help by pre-ordering a copy of MavericKids.

For every copy sold we will donate a copy to Gift of The Givers for children in need of reading support.