Defend Truth

SA LIMNOLOGY OP-ED

Rapidly worsening ecological condition of South Africa’s dams will likely eclipse rolling blackouts

Rapidly worsening ecological condition of South Africa’s dams will likely eclipse rolling blackouts
Hartbeespoort Dam, west of Pretoria, colloquially known as “Harties” in Magaliesburg, South Africa, 15 April 2021. (Photo: Flickr / Rckr88)

In the absence of a well-funded, properly informed and cohesive strategic plan for South African reservoir limnology, misinformation will remain a problem, old findings will be ‘rediscovered’, and resort will be made to outdated technologies.

The socioeconomic well-being of South Africa is largely dependent on water stored in reservoir lakes. While technically the term “dam” refers to the wall holding back the “reservoir” of water, this article uses the term dam interchangeably with reservoir.

The South African Department of Water and Sanitation (DWS) manages some 580 dams, 320 of which are considered to be major impoundments, storing more than one million cubic metres of water each. They store a combined 32 billion cubic metres of water, equivalent to 65% of South Africa’s annual rainfall runoff.

From this, irrigation uses 62%, urban and domestic use equals 27% and mining, industry and power generation absorb a further 8%. Commercial forestry utilises the remaining 3%.

Dams are, in reality, man-made or artificial lakes, necessary to sustain life and development in an arid environment that lacks natural lakes. While natural lakes form robust natural ecosystems, dams may be semi-natural at best.

Both types are prone to pollution and other pressures arising from human development of their catchment areas, with dams being generally more sensitive and less resilient to external stressors. This is because they are purposefully sited to collect water from the greatest catchment area possible.

Ensuring the healthy functioning of both natural and artificial lakes requires that deliberate lake management practices be applied. The South African National Water Resource Strategy (NWRS) recognises that “water resource management supports the provision of potable water to all people”, and that “water is central to the economy”.

Our Constitution enshrines the right to “an environment that is not harmful to life or wellbeing”, while the NWRS further observes that “the deterioration of the quality of surface water resources is one of the major threats to South Africa’s capability to provide sufficient water of appropriate quality to meet its needs and to ensure environmental sustainability”.

Reservoirs under threat

Some of the most seriously impacted reservoirs are located in the land-locked economic heartland of South Africa, which experiences an extant regional water quality crisis. This list of dams is long, and includes Bronkhorstspruit, Erfenis, Grootdraai, Klipvoor, Koppies, Laing and Roodeplaat.

All of these waters are, in the main, impacted by nutrient enrichment, known as eutrophication, arising chiefly from inadequately treated sewage and wastewater effluents (Harding 2008). More than half of the country’s total stored capacity has been shown to be affected by this anthropogenic impact (Harding 2015).

South Africa’s best-known example of excessive and sustained eutrophication is Hartbeespoort Dam, west of Pretoria, colloquially known as “Harties”. It was at this very reservoir that much of the world’s early understanding of eutrophication was developed.

Indeed, this writer’s own experience stemmed directly from “Harties” when, as an undergraduate student working vacations at the National Institute of Water Research, I was tasked with harvesting large quantities of toxic cyanobacteria (blue-green algae), from beneath the luxuriant carpet of water hyacinth, which in the Magalies River arm of the dam was almost a metre high above the water surface.

The algal biomass was used as a source of purified microcystin toxins for toxicity testing. The dominant blue-green alga, then and now, was Microcystis aeruginosa, a commonly-occurring species capable of producing a variety of hepatotoxic [liver] cyanotoxins known as microcystins.

Despite this existential threat to water security, our country lacks skills and training in the ecology and ecosystem management of such waters, termed “lentic limnology”, with a generation having passed since there was last any concerted activity in this field.

This was not always the case and, during the 1970s and 1980s, South African scientists led the world in the study of dams impacted by eutrophication originating from wastewater discharged into rivers and streams.

Getting the facts straight

Given this long and rich background of experience, it would be reasonable to assume that South Africa has remained at the forefront of eutrophication assessment and intervention. This is, however, very distant from contemporary reality.

It is, therefore, perhaps unsurprising when a press article, purportedly derived from informed expert opinion, holds a mirror to the parlous state of reservoir limnology in this country today.

On 13 to 15 June 2023, Daily Maverick ran a series of three articles on Hartbeespoort Dam which contained a number of misstatements (see Part 1, Part 2, and Part 3). This opinion addresses Part 1, and endeavours to correct some of the misstatements in the interests of furthering a correct, consistent and sound understanding of the issues at hand. It is assumed that the journalist fact-checked the statements made and also verified the authority of those interviewed as to their relevant experiential background.

First, the article announced that “recent studies have shown that increased nutrients in the [dam] water — either from excessive sewage inflows or rotting plant (hyacinth) matter — has increased the presence of microcystis blooms in the dam.” This could not be further from the truth.

This reservoir has been plagued by Microcystis and water hyacinth problems since the 1960s and, by the early 1970s, the ecological associations prevailing in this nutrient-replete waterbody had been described in detail by Professor Daan Toerien and others.

In 2001, I compiled an annotated bibliography of cyanobacteria in South Africa, rendering the history readily available to all researchers. With this history available it is thus disconcerting that a situation that has prevailed for half a century is purported to be a new and original finding.

The article describes “cyanotoxins” as being toxic bacteria, whereas this term refers to toxins produced by cyanobacteria, the latter also commonly known as blue-green algae.

Secondly, the extremely invasive floating water hyacinth (Pontederia crassipes, formerly Eichhornia crassipes) has, for the past 50 years, happily cohabited with Microcystis in Hartbeespoort Dam.

In this regard, there is an established programme of biocontrol intervention in place at Harties, whereby various insect vectors are used to attack, weaken and hopefully eradicate the hyacinth. The article cites the view of an aquatic specialist who maintains that the decomposition of the weakened/dying plants increases the nutrient availability in the reservoir, i.e. solves one problem but creates another.

However, as a multitude of studies have documented, nutrient availability for plant and algal growth in Harties is to all intents and purposes non-limiting. Quite simply, the hyacinth has taken its nutrients from this luxuriant pool and returns them to the same pool during decomposition.

It is not a case of a raft of hyacinth being washed from a river into a nutrient-poor impoundment — in which case the death and decomposition of the plants could well elevate the ambient nutrient levels and trigger an algal bloom.

Thirdly, the article turns to the use of herbicides for eradicating the hyacinth, a worrying yet all-too-common practice in South Africa. Here a source claims that “herbicides contain glyphosates or Roundup; and that is a potential liver carcinogen.”

There are a number of fundamental errors with this statement which reflect a common confusion about glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) — but not one that presumed experts should be making. There are many types of herbicides and a subset thereof contain glyphosates — whereas the quoted source implies that all herbicides contain glyphosates.

Second, RoundUp is a trademark type of GBH, not all GBHs are RoundUp. RoundUp is, furthermore, quite different in that while indeed a GBH, its formulation contains a co-formulant, a polyethoxylated tallow amine, which is toxic to aquatic organisms and also carcinogenic.

In relation to water hyacinth, the article goes on to suggest that decomposing hyacinth results in low (dissolved) oxygen levels that “creates microcystin [sic]”. This is a garbled abstraction of the production of toxins inside cyanobacteria cells and their release when the algal cells lyse (break down). Then is submitted the non sequitur that the decomposition of the water hyacinth both contributes to algal blooms and results in “the bacteria killing each other…”.

Fourthly, the same source provides information on research to remove cyanobacteria from raw potable supplies. This is a well-established engineering ability present in many water treatment works in South Africa since the 1980s.

However, the cited work claims that the use of chlorine in treatment trials resulted in an adverse outcome. The use of chlorine or copper sulphate for this purpose was long ago found to be problematic for the very reasons mentioned in the article, and since contraindicated in potable water treatment processes. It is therefore surprising that such a lack of relevant subject awareness still pertains and that attempts to use chlorine for this purpose are still being trialled today.

Change cannot be fuelled by misinformation

Calls for an urgently needed reservoir management programme, one that embraces the remaining individual and institutional memory, integrates all available relevant knowledge and scientific findings, prioritises needs and acquires those skills and resources necessary to meet what is likely to become a crippling legacy of inaction, have been ignored by the DWS since the early 2000s. A report commissioned in 1988 and which exposed reparable failings in South Africa’s limnology skillset is as relevant today as then, but was kept secret until exposed in 2010 to an international audience.

Hartbeespoort Dam is grossly enriched with plant nutrients generated from a suite of wastewater treatment works in the reservoir’s catchment. It is but one of many similarly afflicted South African dams.

The only solution to turning this situation around is to attenuate nutrient availability at source, i.e. utilise a treatment process which can reduce nutrients to a level commensurate with the capacity of the downstream reservoir to accumulate the same.

This is not an easy task, it is not a short-term task and it will require significant funding. Hartbeespoort Dam receives nutrient loads that exceed its threshold for algal blooms by a factor of four or greater. In the absence of a fundamental reduction of nutrients at source, Harties will continue its legacy of unmanaged eutrophication and present as an increasingly unpleasant risk to human health.

What can be taken from this? In the absence of a well-funded, properly informed and cohesive strategic plan for South African reservoir limnology, misinformation will remain a problem, old findings will be “rediscovered”, and resort will be made to outdated technologies. The country will remain ill-equipped to manage its impounded water supplies.

Scientific wheels will be reinvented and a search for quick-fix “silver bullet” solutions will continue. The rapidly worsening ecological condition of South Africa’s dams will soon catapult the problems they pose to the fore, a scenario that will probably eclipse the hardships associated with electricity load shedding. DM

Dr Bill Harding is a limnologist with a special and long-term interest in eutrophication and cyanobacteria. He also holds a PhD in Public Law, specialising in water and public trust law. He has authored around 700 consultancy reports ranging from headwater streams in the Cederberg to hypersaline lakes in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). He designed and oversaw the construction of the award-winning Intaka Island wetland at Century City.

Gallery
Absa OBP

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Robert Gornal says:

    What an exceptionally well written article on a pressing problem. We still have the skilled professionals to correct the problems besetting our country but not the government willing to use them.

  • Bruce Danckwerts says:

    As a farmer I have been interested in this problem (of nutrient overload in our lakes, dams and rivers) for a number of years. The accepted wisdom is that algal blooms are due to nutrients eroded or leached from agricultural land. However, I have often suspected that the nutrients in a city’s sewage must also be a significant contributor. It may not sound like much, but, in every tonne of grain that us farmers send to the cities, there is about 40kg of mineral nutrients (that our crops cannot get from the atmosphere) and the cities are not sending those nutrients back to the farms . . . they are (eventually) being flushed out into our lakes and oceans. If an economic way could be found of reclaiming these nutrients during the sewage purification process, it would be a useful way of closing the nutrient cycle so that these recovered nutrients could be sent back to the agricultural fields that contributed them in the first place. Bruce Danckwerts, CHOMA, Zambia

  • Senzo Moyakhe says:

    Seeing as a ‘Joe Soap’ like myself saw the hyacinth (didn’t even know the name of the plant, so did borderline research) unfettered growth in our local dams and grew concerned enough to check, I cannot understand how our qualified scientists are not putting pressure on government to pay proper attention to this. As putrid as what I’m gonna put forward here is: a focussed dirty campaign of getting our ‘informal settlement’ residents aware of water collection and reticulation and USING their easily stoked anger to force attention from government. Tell them to ‘complain’ that their promised water supply is affected by how we look after our dams. Clean dams = clean water. A putrid use (😲) of people but sometimes you gotta punch below the belt…

    They were promised clean water regardless of their urban shack villages. Take away the ‘sewerage run-off and bacterial nutrient enrichment’ aspect and just tell them about the invasive nature and manageability of hyacinth. They know about plant invasion on a superficial level, so you won’t be ‘talking Greek’ to them. I’m not CIA so I don’t know how this will be done…

    (I’m embarrassed…🙈)

  • Mike Newton says:

    Nearly every time I read a newspaper article describing something I have experienced, or know a great deal about, they get it wrong.
    It is a great pity that this applies to DM is no better than the rest.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.7% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.3% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.3% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country.

Be part of that 0.3%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

MavericKids vol 3

How can a child learn to read if they don't have a book?

81% of South African children aged 10 can't read for meaning. You can help by pre-ordering a copy of MavericKids.

For every copy sold we will donate a copy to Gift of The Givers for children in need of reading support.