Dailymaverick logo

Newsdeck

This article is more than a year old

Newsdeck

Wall Street’s Most Hated Three Letters Prove Too Risky to Ignore

As the acronym “ESG” ends up among the most hated on Wall Street, the financial cost of ignoring it is making headlines.
Bloomberg
BM-ATB-Ed-ANC-ESG (Image: iStock)

In just the past few weeks, a string of textbook environmental, social and governance issues — spanning workers’ rights to extreme weather — erupted in a number of major stocks.

The world’s biggest publicly traded package courier, United Parcel Service Inc., was forced to issue a profit warning that drove down its shares, after it said a tentative labor agreement will add to its costs. The firm agreed to raise wages for some workers, bump up the amount of paid vacation and improve working conditions. That includes installing air conditioning in new vehicles rendered unbearably hot by extreme heat.

That was followed by the world’s largest tour operator, TUI AG, which lost more than a tenth of its market value in the first half of August alone after environmental devastation in the form of wild fires in Southern Europe destroyed some of the region’s popular holiday destinations. The company said it will incur costs of about €25 million due to the fires, while analysts at Bernstein said “it remains to be seen” what the full impact will be.

And then this week, investors learned that lawsuits have been filed against Hawaiian Electric Industries Inc., alleging its power lines may have exacerbated the deadliest US wildfires in more than a century. Its shares plunged roughly 40%, and its municipal bonds also fell.

While no official cause has been identified for the fire, the utility has faced criticism for not turning off power despite weather forecasters’ warnings that dry, gusty winds could create critical conditions. Ratings of Hawaiian Holdings, the parent of Hawaiian Airlines Inc., were also downgraded by Moody’s Investors Service.

“There’s still this cognitive dissonance between using the label ‘ESG’ and accounting for the business impacts from these real-world issues,” said  Rob Du Boff, senior ESG analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. “People see ESG as bad, but when you say that wildfires have financial risks, they’ll agree with you.”

Read more: Hawaiian Electric Extends Record Slump With Future in Doubt

ESG was coined back in 2004 by United Nations staffers as a way for investors and bankers to weigh key risks and opportunities such as rising temperatures, worker disputes and corporate malfeasance, and to determine their impacts on profits.

Sustainability purists have since bemoaned the finance industry’s embrace of ESG as little more than a marketing gimmick. Meanwhile, Republicans have attacked ESG, casting it as part of a leftist agenda that threatens American capitalism.

Against that backdrop, investors and bankers are avoiding saying “ESG” in meetings with clients, according to a recent Bloomberg survey. However, they’re still integrating what ESG stands for in their work, the same survey showed.

ESG backlash is having an effect, but... |

The list of recent investor losses tied to ESG-related events is long. In July, the largest US telecoms companies, AT&T Inc., saw its shares sink after the Wall Street Journal reported that its cables contained toxic lead. Shares of Verizon Communications Inc. also fell as investors reacted to the news.

Read More: AT&T Says Less Than 10% of Network Has Lead Covered Cables 

Republicans had dubbed July “ESG month,” as GOP lawmakers held a succession of congressional hearings to push back on Wall Street’s ESG efforts. But then July ended up being the planet’s hottest month on record, forcing investors and businesses to acknowledge the fallout of extreme heat as well as its social ramifications.

Even if the rhetoric surrounding ESG dies down, “the actual underlying issues are only getting louder and louder,” Du Boff said.

Comments

Loading your account…
Stuart 16 August 2023 08:27 PM

ESG has been captured and I am very anti what it stands for and have given instructions to my financial advisor that if there is any sort of push or marketing of this aspect in or by a company, it is not to be invested in. It is nonsense …. Not what it stands for but the way it is being used to manipulate and coerce people into supporting it. Concern, conscience and decent behaviour are necessary but this nonsense is completely overboard and totally ‘corrupt activist’ in that to the driving parties, the desired end justify the means, regardless of decency.