South Africa


Judge Tintswalo Makhubele ‘abetted corruption’ at Prasa, tribunal hears

Judge Tintswalo Makhubele ‘abetted corruption’ at Prasa, tribunal hears
The Judicial Conduct Tribunal is hearing evidence about Judge Tintswalo Makhubele’s conduct as Prasa interim board chairperson. (Photo: Judges Matter)

Prasa whistle-blower Martha Ngoye stood firm under cross-examination during the Judicial Conduct Tribunal against Judge Tintswalo Makhubele.

Following an adjournment in February, the Judicial Conduct Tribunal against Judge Tintswalo Makhubele resumed in Rosebank, Johannesburg, on Monday with whistle-blower Martha Ngoye on the stand.

Ngoye, who has been suspended as head of legal, risk and compliance at the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa), was the second witness to testify at the tribunal into Judge Makhubele’s conduct. The first witness, who provided two days of testimony, was Gauteng High Court Judge President Dunstan Mlambo. (Ngoye has won an arbitration ruling against her dismissal, but Prasa has appealed against the ruling.)

#UniteBehind accused Makhubele of breaching the separation of powers principle, and of improper conduct while she was the chairperson of Prasa’s interim board. The organisation also alleged Makhubele negotiated and entered into a confidential settlement agreement with representatives of the corruption-accused company Siyaya, and sidelined Prasa’s internal legal team.

The Judicial Conduct Committee recommended a Judicial Conduct Tribunal in March 2020 following #UniteBehind’s complaint to the Judicial Service Commission in January 2019.

Advocate Vincent Maleka, acting for Makhubele, stated during cross-examination of Ngoye that Makhubele was carrying out the duties and responsibilities expected of her as interim board chairperson.

Included in the decisions taken by the interim board at the time was the suspension of the legal panel, a move Ngoye criticised in her testimony at the tribunal’s last sitting.

“The board of Judge Makhubele, when it came into office, was well within its rights and duties to deal with that question,” argued Maleka.

Maleka told the tribunal that the legal panel — a list of law firms used by Prasa — was found to be “improperly constituted” by the Auditor-General. He said among the issues raised was irregular expenditure by Prasa when enlisting the services of firms included on the panel.

Ngoye conceded there were issues with the legal panel, hence her department’s efforts to rectify them by attempting to convene to appoint a legal panel that met the required criteria. She said when the board suspended the legal panel “with immediate effect” during Makhubele’s tenure, there was no clear directive in the form of a “signed resolution” that instructed her department about the procurement of legal services.

Ngoye said that instead, her department received an unsigned excerpt from a document detailing a discussion during a board meeting that stated legal services were to be procured through the supply chain management process and in consultation with the chairperson of the board. This decision, according to Ngoye, resulted in the sidelining of the legal department as well as a confidential settlement agreement with representatives of Siyaya.

She told the tribunal that despite hearing from Prasa’s business unit that no money was owed to Siyaya, and that the rail agency had a strong case against it in court, there were plans for a “secret settlement” with the contractor Siyaya, which included a payment of about R56-million.

Maleka challenged Ngoye’s claim that the settlement was a secret, saying it had been discussed with then Prasa group CEO Lindikhaya Zide, and Diale Mogashoa Attorneys, who were enlisted by Makhubele to represent the organisation in the matter. That Ngoye was not informed about the settlement did not mean it was a “secret”, he argued.

Asked by Maleka whether she believed Makhubele “aided and abetted corruption at Prasa”, Ngoye responded: “The Siyaya transaction and the settlement thereof is tantamount to a corrupt transaction… I am saying yes.”

Meanwhile, legal officer and director at #UniteBehind, Joseph Mayson, said the organisation was confident that evidence would reveal Makhubele’s conduct as interim board chairperson was “unbecoming of a judge”.

The tribunal continues on Tuesday. DM

First published by GroundUp.


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • jcdville stormers says:

    A product of the ANC(a nest of thieves)

  • Jane Crankshaw says:

    There is no point in pretending all is well with our Judiciary….this has been captured as well. Nothing that we could Trust in the past is now Trustworthy thanks to the incompetence of BEE policies, our captured economy and our unworthy government party, the ANC.
    The only power that could possibly change anything lies in the hands of Biz SA and the taxpayer….time to use that card….and we won’t call it an Ace lol!

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options