Maverick Citizen


It’s time for outrage about the quality of learning in SA’s schools

It’s time for outrage about the quality of learning in SA’s schools
Learners at a primary school in the Eastern Cape. (Photo: Felix Dlangamandla)

The system is failing our poorest learners. Nearly 30 years since we became a democracy and the majority of SA’s learners are not learning to read, write or add. Instead of a ‘silent revolution’, our schools are in a silent crisis.

In November 2012, it was revealed that, of all 65 participating countries, Peru had come last in the Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa) — an international test administered by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Instead of downplaying the result, Peru’s new minister of education, Jaime Saavedra, decided to own the problem. “We’re not in trouble. We’re in deep trouble,” he said.

Saavedra immediately set about galvanising the education sector into action: “We can’t beat Brazil at soccer, but we can beat them at maths,” was his rallying cry.

Peru’s systemwide reform programme included the introduction of teacher and principal entrance exams and promotion evaluations, school bonuses based on performance, boosting the role of principals in hiring processes for teachers, and the increased generation and use of comprehensive performance data.

The reforms have been remarkably successful, with increases of 8% in reading and science and 6% in maths for Grade 3 learners in Pisa between 2009 and 2015. By 2018, Peru had achieved the quickest movement up the Pisa tables among Latin American countries, with 12 countries now below Peru in the rankings.

The Peru story shows what can happen when an education leader committed to reform diagnoses the problem correctly, designs and implements effective reform measures and with the support of the president and the broader society.

South Africa has the same desperate need for reform as Peru.

Researchers calculate in 2023 that it is likely that more than 80% of our Grade 4 learners cannot read for meaning in any language. In 2019, only 37% of Grade 5 learners had some basic mathematical knowledge. In 2021, more than half of Grade 1 learners did not know all the letters of the alphabet after a year of schooling.

South Africa performs very badly in international tests, compared to other countries, many of them poorer than us. In the 2019 Trends in Mathematics and Science Study, South Africa’s Grade 9 learners — on a maths test designed for Grade 8s — placed us stone last out of 39 participating countries. Similarly, in the 2016 Progress in International Reading Literacy Study, South Africa had the lowest average reading literacy score out of 50 participating countries.

Instead of “owning” the problem, President Cyril Ramaphosa speaks glowingly of a “silent revolution” under way in education. Minister of Basic Education Angie Motshekga proudly talks of “a system on the rise”. But the truth is that the system is failing our poorest learners. Nearly 30 years since we became a democracy and the majority of SA’s learners are not learning to read, write or add. Instead of a “silent revolution”, our schools are in a silent crisis.

The time has come to shout out loud about the crisis in education.

A package of reforms

The Centre for Development and Enterprise (CDE) has published a series of research reports that lay bare the facts of SA’s failure to deliver quality education in our schools and propose an approach and package of reforms to fix it.

A significant determinant of poor education outcomes in South Africa is the quality and quantity of teaching. According to education expert Professor Nic Spaull, four out of five teachers lack the content knowledge and pedagogical skills to teach their subjects. Just 41% of Grade 6 maths teachers are proficient in teaching maths, compared to 87% in Zimbabwe and 95% in Kenya. According to Motshekga, South Africa’s teacher absenteeism rate is the highest of all the SADC countries — but what has she done about that?

A central thrust of reform has to be to transform our mainly inefficient and corrupt education bureaucracy, which fails to give teachers the support they need and does not hold them accountable for poor performance.

This major change will only be possible if we confront the reality that the South African Democratic Teachers’ Union (Sadtu), has effectively captured the education system by infiltrating the bureaucracy at every level. The 2016 Ministerial Task Team appointed to investigate the so-called Jobs for Cash scandal involving the illegal payment for principals and teaching posts reached a shocking conclusion: “Sadtu is in de facto charge of the management, administration and priorities of education” in “six and possibly more of the nine provinces”.

To be effective, education reform in South Africa needs to be system-wide, with the aim of improving learning and teaching as its core objective. CDE recommendations include four critical priorities to improve education outcomes:

  • Tackling corruption in the education system (prosecutions, protection for whistle-blowers, and so on) and eliminating State Capture through the prohibition of cadre deployment and introducing measures that weaken Sadtu’s stranglehold on education departments.
  • Raising accountability levels by bringing back the Annual National Assessment (ANA) tests for grades 1 to 9, reinvigorating the National Education Evaluation and Development Unit, and giving principals more power over the appointment and management of teachers in their schools.
  • Improving teacher performance by introducing higher standards of teacher training, strengthening the support that existing teachers receive and recruiting skilled foreign teachers in priority areas such as maths and science.
  • Installing fresh leadership in public education: South Africa needs a new minister of basic education and a top team in the national department to drive and achieve systemwide reform against firm targets, budgets and deadlines. Equally important, the MMCs and heads of department in charge of provincial education departments need to be determined, capable reform leaders. The President’s full support is required for the tough political decisions essential to improve performance.

Systemwide reform can only succeed if all stakeholders push for it. Civil society organisations have launched important campaigns, but they tend to focus heavily on infrastructure and avoid the tough issues around weak teaching and union dominance. Too often, business avoids tackling the root causes of dysfunction and prefers to invest in projects that don’t always make a real and lasting impact. For political parties, it is easier to pick up on whatever issue is in the media that particular week, rather than thinking too hard about what it will take to fundamentally reform the system.

Reformers should take encouragement from the several Latin American countries that have confronted similar challenges and were able to overcome them. What is required is strong demand from below for better schooling, a louder voice for groups who have a powerful stake in better-performing schools (especially parents and business) and political leaders who are ready to heed those voices and commit themselves strongly and openly to a reform process that does not avoid the biggest, most important issues.

In Mexico, a public outcry was unleashed after a documentary called De Panzazo (Barely Getting By) was released by a business-backed political advocacy organisation in response to very low Pisa scores in 2006. The documentary highlighted union corruption and teacher indifference, putting unions on the back foot against an outraged citizenry.

Here in South Africa, we need to be outraged too. Reform of the basic education system must be recognised for the urgent national priority it is. To move South Africa in that direction, a concerted effort must be made to make education reform one of the key national priorities in the lead-up to the 2024 elections. DM

Bernstein is head of the Centre for Development and Enterprise. This article is based on ‘The Silent Crisis,’ a series of five CDE research reports on South Africa’s failing education system.


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • virginia crawford says:

    It’s all absolutely true and very depressing. And supposedly ‘good’ schools are problematic too. It might be an idea to galvanize parents into action. Widely publicized articles on TV or social media should inform parents about what their child should be able to do at each grade, and then they can demand answers from the school and teachers. If a child can’t read at age 10, how have they passed the previous years? It’s another trick to hide the problem – just push children up to the next grade regardless. All the consequences have been well put, but imagine how these kids must feel, floundering and not understanding what’s on the board. It must be beyond awful and so frustrating. What are the consequences of this?

  • Jane Quin says:

    Thanks for raising your voice for improving education in our schools. I’m inspired to add a few more thoughts and questions in pursuit of addressing our ongoing systemic education challenges. I do think it is helpful to consider education in phases related to broadly typical childhood development. I think we need to be asking questions like: do the children love coming to school? does it make them happy? are they comfortably fed, watered, loved and cared for while there? Are they learning to grow such skills for and among themselves from their experiences and formal instructional support? Are they given opportunities to discover the magic value of numbers in this pursuit, and the wonder of what ideas and independence can be opened by learning to read? How are we helping teachers reignite their motivation to grow – for themselves and their learners? Certainly not by rewarding principles for ‘performance’ of high student numbers that overburden even the most ardent teacher. And adding more alien external assessment before better teacher support only makes it worse. Who cares if a 7 year old kid doesn’t know the whole alphabet? People don’t all live and learn in the same straight line. And all learning communities have contextual strengths & weaknesses to work with. What if we aim to have everyone leave Grade 4 with a good sense of self, life & learning and some basic tools to keep developing accordingly? while focusing on the needs of all most closely concerned in any context?

  • Rona van Niekerk says:

    We also need subject experts to write (or at least review) school textbooks.
    Here are some examples of incorrect information in Grade 5 books:
    South Africa has two capital cities, Cape Town & Pretoria. (The SA Gov website says South Africa has three capital cities, the above two and Bloemfontein).
    The biggest river in South Africa is the Orange-Gariep. (All official maps and documents call it the Orange. There is no record of the name having changed).
    The capital of Mpumalanga is Nelspruit. (A grade later this changes to Mbombela and all those who remember what they learnt the previous year are promptly marked wrong).
    The Natural Science book makes a hash of environments (which should be based on the biomes in South Africa) and adds insult to injury by giving water hyacinth as an example of an aquatic plant, without mentioning that it is an invasive alien that is costing millions to eradicate. Surely using one of our beautiful water lilies would have made more sense – preferably with a jacana on it!
    We need to improve the accuracy of what is being taught – as well as the ability of teachers to teach, and also to recognise incorrect information when they see it.

  • Sam van Coller says:

    The CDE’s work is highly professional, much needed and an accurate description of what is happening. The problem is how does a very professional think tank persuade the two main actors – SADTU and DOBE – both of whom are powerful political players to change their ways. They are effectively being told they are responsible for South African education being bottom of the international ‘class’. Teachers are having a torrid time dealing with feral children from undisciplined homes and education officials are suffering from inadequate management leadership and the sheer size of the problem. In order to get muscle behind its excellent work, maybe the CDE could get a panel of leading educationists to assist it in persuading BLSA and BUSA to take a set of recommendations drawn from the reports’ findings to NEDLAC or directly to government. New institutions will be needed to upgrade teacher skills, develop better material, upgrade management skills and develop the use of digital technology. Most important of all, the two main players will have to become part of the solution – if antagonized they will simply defy any proposed solution. Their side of the story has to be heard.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options