---
title: "Sam Bankman-Fried Charged in US With Bribing Chinese Officials"
description: "Sam Bankman-Fried was charged with bribing Chinese officials, adding a new dimension to the US government’s case against the FTX co-founder."
type: "NewsArticle"
publisher: "Daily Maverick"
site: "https://www.dailymaverick.co.za"
section: "Business Maverick"
author: "Bloomberg"
author_url: "https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/author/bloomberg/"
canonical_url: "https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2023-03-28-sam-bankman-fried-charged-in-us-with-bribing-chinese-officials/"
published: "2023-03-28T17:53:38"
lang: "en-ZA"
word_count: 386
---

# Sam Bankman-Fried Charged in US With Bribing Chinese Officials

> Sam Bankman-Fried was charged with bribing Chinese officials, adding a new dimension to the US government’s case against the FTX co-founder.

By Bloomberg · Published 28 March 2023, 19:53 SAST

## Key points
- In a surprising twist, Mike Bankman-Fried faces 13 criminal counts for allegedly authorizing $40 million in bribes to Chinese officials to unfreeze Alameda trading accounts. To make matters worse, he's also accused of attempting to influence US crypto regulation through donations.
- Sam Bankman-Fried faces 13 criminal counts, including conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
- Prosecutors allege Bankman-Fried tried to regain access to frozen Alameda accounts by bribing Chinese officials.
- An earlier indictment accused him of using FTX funds for political donations and influencing US crypto regulation.
- He is currently free on a $250 million bail package and is due to face trial in October.

## Content

The new charge was unsealed Tuesday in a [revised indictment](https://assets.bwbx.io/documents/users/iqjWHBFdfxIU/rNFh1mB2aO2c/v0)by federal prosecutors in Manhattan. Bankman-Fried is accused of authorizing the payment of $40 million to one or more Chinese government officials in order to get them to unfreeze accounts at Alameda Research, a Hong Kong-based trading firm affiliated with FTX, holding more than $1 billion in cryptocurrency.

Prosecutors allege Bankman-Fried and others sought to regain access to the assets held in Alameda accounts in 2021 to fund additional trading activity, according to the indictment.

A spokesman for Bankman-Fried didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

### 13-Count Indictment

With the charge of conspiracy to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, Bankman-Fried now faces 13 criminal counts. He has already pleaded not guilty to several fraud charges for allegedly funneling billions of dollars from now-bankrupt FTX to Alameda and for personal expenses.

Three of his close associates, Gary Wang, Caroline Ellison and Nishad Singh, have already pleaded guilty to fraud and are cooperating with the government.

Bankman-Fried is currently free on a $250 million bail package and is due to face trial in October. He was arrested in the Bahamas, where his cryptocurrency empire FTX was based, in December and extradited back to the United States.

An earlier revised indictment unsealed in February beefed up campaign-finance related charges against Bankman-Fried, a onetime major donor to Democratic political candidates. Prosecutor claimed Bankman-Fried conspired to influence US crypto regulation through donations by him and others at FTX.

[Read more: Bankman-Fried Prosecutors Allege Plot to Shape Crypto Policy](https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-23/new-charges-to-be-unsealed-in-bankman-fried-case)

According to the latest indictment, Chinese law enforcement authorities in 2021 froze Alameda trading accounts on two of the country’s largest crypto exchanges as part of a probe into a counter-party.

Bankman-Fried and “others operating at his direction” tried to unfreeze the accounts, including by recruiting attorneys to lobby in China for the assets to be released and trying to transfer the crypto to fraudulent accounts set up on a Chinese exchange.

After months of failed attempts, prosecutors allege, Bankman-Fried directed a bribe payment in the form of cryptocurrency to be transferred from Alameda’s main trading account to a private wallet. The accounts were subsequently unfrozen and Bankman-Fried authorized the transfer of the remaining bribe.

The case is US v. Bankman-Fried, 22-cr-673, US District Court, Southern District of New York (Manhattan).