Newsdeck

CONSTITUTIONAL ROW

Sunak blocks Scotland’s gender bill, stoking nationalist ire

Sunak blocks Scotland’s gender bill, stoking nationalist ire
UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. (Photo: Supplied)

(Bloomberg) — UK Prime Minister Rishi Sunak blocked transgender rights legislation passed by the Scottish Parliament, setting up a major constitutional row and fanning nationalist sentiment in Scotland.

Sunak’s administration said on Monday that the Scottish legislation — which makes it easier for transgender people to self-declare as a different gender from the one they were assigned at birth — would have an “adverse impact” on Great Britain-wide equalities legislation.

“I have not taken this decision lightly,” Scottish Secretary Alister Jack said in a statement. “The bill would have a significant impact on, amongst other things, GB-wide equalities matters in Scotland, England and Wales. I have concluded, therefore, that this is the necessary and correct course of action.”

The veto sets the stage for a major constitutional clash between the Scottish National Party, which leads the administration in Edinburgh, and Sunak’s government. It’s the first time the UK has blocked any law passed by the Scottish Parliament since it was formed in 1999.

The prime minister’s move is also likely to feed into a renewed push for independence by First Minister Nicola Sturgeon’s nationalists — who for years have been calling for a second independence referendum following a failed bid in 2014.

Sturgeon has argued that Britain’s 2016 vote to leave the European Union — a move that was opposed in Scotland — has changed the calculation from 2014, when she described the plebiscite as a “once in a generation” vote.

Critics

Ahead of Sunak’s decision, Sturgeon said it would be an “outrage” if the UK chose to block the Scottish legislation, arguing the central government would be using trans people as a political weapon. She said the gender reform bill was covered by powers devolved to Scotland.

The Scottish government is now is likely to challenge Sunak’s decision in the courts. Sunak, meanwhile, has been advised by his government lawyers that the bill affects UK-wide legislation on equalities, and that he was entitled to block it under Section 35 of the 1998 Scotland Act.

The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Bill makes it easier for trans people to obtain a gender recognition certificate and also cuts to 16 the minimum age at which they can self-declare as a different gender. It reduces the time required to live in their acquired gender before being recognised and removes the need for a medical diagnosis of gender dysphoria.

“Transgender people who are going through the process to change their legal sex deserve our respect, support and understanding,” Jack said. He added that if the Scottish government chose to amend the legislation, “I hope we can work together to find a constructive way forward that both respects devolution and the operation of UK Parliament legislation.”

‘Intrusive’

Opponents of the controversial bill argue the changes fail to protect women’s rights and single-sex spaces and could allow violent males to “abuse” the system in environments such as women’s jails. Other critics say it is not appropriate to allow 16-year-olds to decide on such a profound change in their lives and the decision should be reserved for adults.

The Scottish legislation has also sparked concerns about so-called gender tourism to Scotland from other parts of the UK, whereby a transgender woman could legally change gender in Scotland, then use their new status to access female-only spaces in the rest of the country.

But the SNP’s Social Justice Secretary Shona Robison has argued the legislation is about making life easier for some of the most stigmatised people in society by removing “intrusive, medicalised and bureaucratic” processes for obtaining a gender recognition certificate.

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Riette Fern says:

    “it is not appropriate to allow 16-year-olds to decide on such a profound change in their lives and the decision should be reserved for adults.” But apparently 16-year-olds are perfectly adult enough to make the decision to get married in Scotland and GB has no issue with that?
    Rishi’s reasoning is defective. To the concern of dangerous / violent men accessing women’s safe spaces and women’s jails, cis men do not need to inconvenience themselves in any way to abuse women. Consider the long-servicing Police Officer who has just confessed to raping 24 women in the UK.

  • jeyezed says:

    Although it is an unlikely topic to have triggered such action, it is high time that the question of who is in charge of Scotland was properly resolved. Any illusions that the SNP
    may hold about the powers of the Scottish Parliament must be firmly dispelled. Their similarities to a city council are greater than those to a proper government like Westminster, and their SNP need to be reminded of that. In fact, the whole question of why there are Scottish MPs in Westminster needs to be addressed, because it is this aspect that confuses them. Scots are British first and Scottish second. Any other interpretation attacks the Act of Union.

  • Roger Graham says:

    “Transgender people who are going through the process to change their legal sex…”. “Legal”… How specious is this. By defining a gender before birth as a “legal” entity, the man pretends that he has entered the womb and presented the embyro with the terms of its legal status, as if the law comes before the creation of life. This is not the case: one is born with a specific gender which the law now seeks to supplant by making it as if society created your gender, not God.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Become a Maverick Insider

This could have been a paywall

On another site this would have been a paywall. Maverick Insider keeps our content free for all.

Become an Insider

Every seed of hope will one day sprout.

South African citizens throughout the country are standing up for our human rights. Stay informed, connected and inspired by our weekly FREE Maverick Citizen newsletter.