South Africa


Malema would collaborate/subjugate/exterminate: Why the ANC would be foolish to accept the EFF leader’s ‘help’

Malema would collaborate/subjugate/exterminate: Why the ANC would be foolish to accept the EFF leader’s ‘help’
Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) leader Julius Malema (Photo: Gallo Images / Volksblad / Mlungisi Louw)

EFF leader Julius Malema has made his move, declaring that his party is prepared to work with the ANC as a coalition partner. But he also says his party will 'use the ANC to destroy itself', claiming that the ANC exists to serve white capital.

With some polls suggesting the ANC could win above 50% of the vote and others stating it could fall well below that in the 2024 elections, EFF leader Julius Malema has now made his move, claiming that his party could work with the ANC as a coalition partner. 

In a situation where it is not possible to predict what will happen, and with more political players coming into the mix, Malema’s comments will convince some that this is a likely outcome.

It is also likely, however, that it is Malema’s own actions that will make it impossible for the ANC to ever formally work with the EFF in national government. Malema’s comments — first made in an interview with News24 — may even be an indication that he is out of ideas, and is unable to regain the momentum and energy that his party had several years ago. (He is probably not the only opposition party leader in this position.)

Malema’s comment that his party could work with the ANC appears to come with a series of other controversial statements. He said the EFF could “use the ANC to destroy itself”, while also claiming that the ANC was a party that existed to serve white capital.

Malema said ANC Treasurer Paul Mashatile would be a better leader than President Cyril Ramaphosa, who he believes should be removed from office.

Sparking speculation

These comments are perhaps having the effect that Malema desired: they are starting a period of speculation about who could work with who after 2024. And although much of the attention is on the national government, it is likely that the politics of several provinces will become even more complicated after the poll.

Malema may now say that he is willing to work with the ANC in the national government, but he does not appear to have explained why, when given the option of who to work with just last year, he decided to vote in favour of DA mayors and speakers in Ekurhuleni and Joburg.

Why did he want to back the DA just last year, but has now decided he wants to back the ANC? It suggests there is a distinct lack of principle involved; that Malema is prepared to back whomever will give him the best deal at the moment.

He is not alone in this — the politics of coalitions is not often about principle. As has been said several times in several places, politicians will often “double-cross that bridge when they come to it”.

That said, Malema’s comments may make it impossible for the ANC to decide to work with him.

First, it is unlikely that any party that would be the majority partner in a coalition would want to work with another party that explicitly claims that its aim is to “use the ANC to destroy itself”.

It’s one thing to work with a party that competes against you for votes; it’s another to work with one that publicly says it wants to destroy you.

Also, Malema’s continued apparent support for some ANC leaders over others makes it even more difficult. Just three years ago he claimed that Deputy President David Mabuza was “clean”; a month later, he claimed that Mabuza was “rotten”.

Two weeks ago, Malema claimed that former State Security Agency director-general Arthur Fraser’s claims about the Phala Phala scandal were really the work of former president Thabo Mbeki.

He provided no evidence for this, and Mbeki strongly denied it. Absent any proof, it must be presumed that Malema simply lied about the internal dynamics of the ANC.

So why should the ANC trust him?

It is also likely that Malema’s real intention is to weaken and remove the ANC’s most popular leader, who is still Ramaphosa. If this is the case, then it would be foolish for the ANC to accept his offer to work with him.

Visit Daily Maverick’s home page for more news, analysis and investigations

Gravity-defying flip-flops

It should be remembered that although Malema is often accused of flip-flopping on important issues, the one consistent strand appears to be his support for any person who could weaken Ramaphosa.

But his other flip-flops do indeed defy gravity. He believed that suspended Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane should be removed, but now he supports her.

He also supported the judiciary during the Jacob Zuma years, and said Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe should be removed as he was a “rotten potato”. Now he appears to actively undermine the judiciary and believes Hlophe should be Chief Justice because he has the “best legal mind”.

There are many other examples of this. And yet, through it all, Ramaphosa has consistently remained his target. 

(There’s not much surprise there: Ramaphosa was the ANC Disciplinary Committee’s Appeals chair and it was he who sealed Malema’s fate as the leader of the ANC Youth League — Ed)

Malema is not the only party leader to suggest that he would work with the ANC. DA leader John Steenhuisen has suggested — several times — that his party would be prepared to form a government with Ramaphosa as President.

However, when party leaders make this kind of comment, it is also possible that there is another dynamic at play. It is surely an admission, both by Steenhuisen and Malema, that they cannot get the support needed on their own. They are practically giving up on the idea of forming their own Cabinet, or even of being a senior coalition partner in a national government.

And, in the case of both parties, there is evidence that their progress has stalled. The EFF has appeared to make little headway in 2021’s local elections, despite pandemic conditions that surely made the lives of its core target constituency worse.

In a way, Malema may be now where Steenhuisen was 18 months ago, when he told the Sunday Times: “Could we work with the ANC? Yes, absolutely…”

It is likely that we are about to enter a prolonged period of activity about 2024 coalitions. In some provinces, there will likely be contradictory coalitions (where Party A will be in a coalition with Party B in one province and in opposition to it in another or in national government).

Although it is difficult to say now what will happen, it is incredibly likely that one prediction can be made with some certainty: There will be very little principle involved, and most politicians will be looking for the best deal for themselves, not their constituencies. You can take it to the bank. DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Wendy Dewberry says:

    As scary as it sounds, your end prediction is most plausible. Then one must wonder about the validity of the machinery of voting.

    Further, I’m wondering about the perceived and real difference between a spoilt vote and a no-vote.

  • Dennis Bailey says:

    I guess a flip-flopping Malema is the product of the flip-flopping electorate that is too stupid or uninformed to know better. Even the Brits elect mongrels whose bark serves to champion the cause of the elite. Hard to run an election with facts, just causes, and reasoned arguments because so many promises of been broken without proof.

  • Hermann Funk says:

    Malema is nothing but a political prostitute. (Unfortunately, the same applies to many other politicians too).

  • Peter Doble says:

    Neither option is an inviting scenario. More of the same proven incompetence or unworkable and self serving alliances. Will 2024 prove the real dawn of democracy?

  • Paddy Ross says:

    The DA cobbled together a coalition in Cape Town several years ago that has led to the DA now dominating Cape Town and the Western Cape to the benefit of those who are fortunate enough to live there. People should not be so pessimistic about coalitions as an honest party can use them to build support within the electorate. The big mistake that voters make is to cast their vote for minority parties and thereby give those parties the ability to disrupt an otherwise workable coalition.
    As Holomisa has said, coalition agreements should be signed and sealed to stop those of Malema’s ilk from stopping the coalition majority members from carrying out the wishes of the electorate.

  • Zan-Pierre Beetge says:

    The issue, for me, is one half of the ANC I can definitely see working together with the DA (for SA) and the other half of the ANC I can see can work really well with the EFF (for themselves). I think it comes down maybe to the December conference outcome which side will work with which opposition.

  • Malcolm McManus says:

    Malema is only interested in his own capitalist ambitions. He does not care how he achieves them even if he destroys the whole country in the process. A true sociopath.

  • Geoff Saayman says:

    Why would anyone trust this liar or for that matter the host of politicians that all spew lies and hatred? Useless lot

  • William Kelly says:

    If you take away their money you render them powerless.

  • Colleen Dardagan says:

    I wonder when this chap is going to be prosecuted for his role in the VBS Bank scandal?

  • Cunningham Ngcukana says:

    The analysis of EFF and its positions assumes that political positions are permanent and are not tampered by the environment. The ANC who are seen as implacable enemies got into a relationship with the IFP to govern Johannesburg an agreement crafted by Ace Magashule whom you must research his past statements on the IFP. The EFF finds itself in a situation where the DA is not prepared to get into coalitions with them but needs their votes in EkuRhuleni and in Johannesburg. This foolish position of the DA is ignored by the analysis and even in Gqeberha. The ANC has shown willingness to work with the EFF despite its statements against them. Certainly, the rigid and immature position of the DA in coalitions which threatens the stability of Gauteng metros is not dealt with. The EFF has at some point have to reflect on the DA position and whether it would want a President Steenhuisen who with Helen Zille insults them daily. The two provinces that are willing to talk to the EFF are Gauteng and KZN. The DA thinks a coalition is a winner takes all and parties must follow its values and vision. The exodus of black leaders is precisely because of its myopic views from Zille and the Institute of Race Relations. Gauteng and the rest of South Africa do not have the unique Western Cape demographics and what the
    DA has done there it will not replicate anywhere in the country and the sooner they grasp that the better for them. It is either they are a Western Cape or South African party.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options