X

This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

The news sucks. But your reading experience doesn't have to. Help us improve that for you by registering for free.



Please create a password or click to receive a login link.


Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten


Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.7% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.3% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.3% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

We need so many more of our readers to join them. The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country. We are inundated with tip-offs; we know where to look and what to do with the information when we have it – we just need the means to help us keep doing this work.

Be part of that 0.3%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

After the Bell: The meat industry is telling us porkers

Business Maverick

AFTER THE BELL

The meat industry is telling us porkers

Illustrative image: A Beyond Burger, a vegan veggie burger.(Photo: Adam Berry / Getty Images) | Milking a cow in the stables. (Photo: Louw Pretorius / Gallo Images) | A plate of meatballs made with plant-based omnipork. (Photo: Paul Yeung / Bloomberg via Getty Images) | Traditional South African boerewors (sausage) cooked on a braai. (Photo: Theuns Botha / Gallo Images)
By Tim Cohen
27 Jun 2022 0

It is a fairly well-known fact that the Normans, people who would later be known as French, contributed about 30% of the words that are now part of the English language, following their conquest of England in 1066. This is one of the reasons why English is such a fabulous language; its dual Romance and Germanic roots mean a larger functional vocabulary than most other languages.

It also results in some weird anomalies. Have you ever thought about why “pork” comes from the pig? Why don’t we just call it pig? When we eat it, it’s called “pork”, and when we eat cattle it’s called “beef”, and sheep is “mutton”. This is because all three words are derived from the Norman French: porc, bœuf and mouton.

This tells you a lot about who was doing the farming and who was doing the eating in Norman England. Incidentally, it doesn’t answer the question about why, in English, you eat chicken and not poulet, but presumably the Normans looked down on chickens and left them for the riff-raff. 

Names and food is such an odd topic. 

A big and complicated hoo-ha has broken out between the meat substitute industry and the Department of Agriculture (it’s actually called DALRRD now — the Department of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development). 

As we reported here, in recent weeks, DALRRD has issued two communiques to producers and suppliers, in which it warned that product names for sausages, strips, burgers, meatballs and other non-meat foodstuffs are illicit. 

Astoundingly, it demanded these goods should be withdrawn from the market immediately for relabelling or be destroyed. 

The meat industry

It was not stated in the communiques, but it doesn’t take a non-bovine animal form very long to work out who is behind this: the meat industry, obvs. And actually, they might in certain circumstances have an argument, in strictly legal terms. 

But in some cases, the result is just ridiculous. 

What, for example, is a “burger”. The dictionary definition is that it is a dish “consisting of a flat round cake of minced beef, or sometimes another savoury ingredient, that is fried or grilled and served in a split bun or roll with various condiments and toppings”.

Consequently, the meat substitute industry is perfectly within its rights to label its goods “a veggie burger” or a “nature burger”, or whatever. Well, as long as it’s round, I suppose.

But what about milk? Doesn’t milk have to come from a cow to be “milk”? Possibly, although you do get coconut milk. What about “meatballs”? That, you would assume, would have to contain meat. And balls. Or perhaps it just has to be ball-shaped.

See how difficult this is?

What about “vegetarian meat”? And will the makers of Christmas tarts have to stop using the description “fruit mince”? 

But the Agric department wasn’t concerned about these difficult and intricate questions, and has banned a whole range of descriptions, including “veggie biltong”, “mushroom biltong”, “plant-based meatballs”, “vegan nuggets”, “plant-based bratwurst, “chorizo and red pepper vegetarian sausages” and “plant-based chicken-style strips”. WTF?

Okay, that last one I think is justifiable; who on Earth would want to eat “plant-based chicken-style strips”? 

But generally, the descriptions are pretty upfront, and the Agric department, in my opinion, has massively over-reached. 

Substitute meat production

The thing about words is that meanings change because society changes. There has been a huge revolution recently in substitute meat production, and, as a global society, there is really no argument but that we should embrace it. 

The caloric and protein conversion efficiencies of livestock compared to a mix of chicken and vegetables is around 7-8%. In other words, it’s about 12 times more efficient to eat chicken and vegetables than it is to eat cattle. Sorry, beef. 

There is a whole new set of businesses which are aimed at disrupting the meat industry by finding plant-based meat substitutes like Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods. 

Beyond Meat is listed and was, at one stage, the best-performing public offering by a major US company in almost two decades. But, sadly, its share price has recently wilted like an unrefrigerated lettuce leaf, and it is now way below the listing price. Still, the company is worth $1.6-billion and continues to expand production. The other big player is Impossible Foods which is, or at least was, planning to list this year.

The repercussions of this change are being felt in odd places. 

Recently, the breakfast cereal group Kellogg’s announced a three-way split in its business. Part of the reason is that it owns a big meat substitute product called Incogmeato, and presumably the company is betting that this section of the split will be valued at tech-industry multiples, so that the parts will be worth more than the whole.

All of this constitutes a huge threat to the meat industry, which is, of course, fighting back, leaving regulators with difficult questions, like “what is meat?”

People around the world love meat, and I certainly do. But regulators should be cautious because all industries will try to preserve their markets, and in this context the meat industry is, in short, trying to tell us porkers. BM/DM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

No Comments, yet

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted