DM168

SAPS 13 STORES

Evidence from crime scenes vanishing from police exhibit storerooms prompts audit

Gauteng Police Commissioner Lieutenant-General Elias Mawela. (Photo: Gallo Images / Luba Lesolle)

Cash, liquor, a bike, cutlery, even a kitchen cabinet, are among items listed as ‘not seen’ — presumed lost or stolen — from just one cop shop. A group of inspecting MPs suspect an ‘inside job’.

Evidence from crime scenes, ranging from real and fake cash to a stove and a dismantled kitchen unit, has gone missing from a police station in Gauteng, shifting focus to criminality among cops and raising concern about how widespread the problem is.

An audit of all police exhibit storerooms, known as SAPS 13 stores, is to be carried out across Gauteng.

National police spokesperson Athlenda Mathe said audits would also be conducted in KwaZulu-Natal and the Western Cape.

“The sourcing and collation of related information commenced on 15 March 2022 and it’s being effected by designated teams,” Mathe said.

“The actual audit commenced in April 2022 and will be finalised by 31 July 2022. Phase Two will then proceed in other provinces, based on risk categorisation.”

Details about the state of SAPS 13 stores are contained in documents that have been submitted to Parliament.

Audits of all Gauteng SAPS exhibits

The Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Police conducted an inspection of Norwood Police Station in Gauteng, where irregularities had been reported in March.

A report on this visit states the committee wanted to know if Gauteng police commissioner Elias Mawela had ordered an audit of all SAPS 13 stores in the province.

“The provincial commissioner indicated that the SAPS has developed a plan of action to execute a provincial-wide audit and that this plan was approved by the provincial management,” the report said.

According to the 2020/21 SAPS annual report, as of 31 March last year, there were 1,155 police stations in  South Africa.

The SAPS 2020/21 crime statistics indicate there are 145 police stations in Gauteng.

175 missing firearms

The Portfolio Committee on Police’s visit to the Norwood station resulted from a scandal involving guns.

In February, Daily Maverick reported that last year it was discovered that 175 firearms had gone missing from the station – 41 of them having been handed in by the public during a licence amnesty exercise, while the rest were court exhibits and probably evidence in court cases.

This revelation came after four firearms recovered at two crime scenes were traced back to the Norwood Police Station, where they were recorded as having been stored.

Parliament heard that the main suspect in this matter had committed suicide.

In February, Daily Maverick reported that Mawela said more police stations were to be audited to see if firearms were missing.

Now a broader problem has emerged – of other items of evidence, meant to be kept for court cases, being plundered from exhibit stores at police stations.

The Freedom Front Plus’ Pieter Groenewald, in parliamentary questions submitted to police bosses in March, asked what other evidence, aside from firearms, had gone missing from the Norwood station’s SAPS 13 store and wanted to know what impact this would have on the administration of justice.

The response, which both Police Minister Bheki Cele and National Police Commissioner Fannie Masemola signed last month, revealed that nearly R80,000 in cash, as well as a wide array of evidence, was missing from the station.

“The impact on court cases is unknown at this stage,” they concluded.

Missing items and empty money bags

A detailed table of the missing items – either lost or stolen – from Norwood Police Station’s SAPS 13 store was included in the parliamentary response.

This list indicated that the missing items were linked to cases dating back to 2015.

Items and incidents listed included:

  • A helmet, bike and beanie, seemingly from a 2015 robbery case, were listed as “not available for audit”.
  • A sergeant received a fake R100 note linked to a 2016 fraud case in March that year and the following month a detective booked it out. But it was not clear what subsequently happened to the fake note.
  • In 2017, cutlery, including 20 forks, 12 tablespoons and 13 knives, as well as a lawnmower, a stepladder and a perfume bottle, formed part of a “possession of presumably stolen property” case. But “none of the exhibits [was] seen for verification”, it was reported.
  • R14,000 linked to a kidnapping was sealed in a bag and handed in to a sergeant in 2018. But the “bag was found in SAPS 13 store torn open no money inside”. The same thing happened with R1,020 handed in to the sergeant in 2019 in connection with a case involving “dealing in an undesirable dependent producing substance”. Several other similar incidents of missing money were recorded.
  • In a possession of presumably stolen property case, a Defy stove and pieces of wood from a dismantled kitchen unit were “not seen” and they were listed as either “lost or stolen”.
  • Cigarettes were “not seen” in a “repealed by Disaster Management Act Regulations 29 April 2020” case. In other words, the “selling of goods, other than essential goods, by a retail store”. This suggested the cigarettes were confiscated during the Covid-19 hard lockdown, when tobacco sales were not allowed. In a similar case, cigarettes and confiscated liquor were also “not seen”.
  • An orange trolley in a residential burglary case was either “lost or stolen”.
  • Confiscated liquor, in a case stemming from 2020, was “not seen” and listed as “lost or stolen”.

Likely to be an inside job

All the items listed as lost or stolen have become the focus of an overall theft case into how these went missing from the SAPS 13 store. In terms of the missing 175 firearms, when the Portfolio Committee on Police visited Norwood in March, members wanted to know if any police officers linked to the station had been investigated for “possible involvement in criminality”.

According to the report, the members of Parliament were told a criminal case had been opened in relation to the firearms.

However, they were also informed that “there is no known [police] member colluding with criminals”.

The MPs were suspicious.

“The committee noted that the evidence store is located at the lower-ground level of the station and is built in a safe, thus constituting a strong room,” the report said.

“The committee observed that the firearm theft must have been an ‘inside job’ as it was clear that firearms could not have been stolen from the evidence store without anybody noticing.” DM168

This story first appeared in our weekly Daily Maverick 168 newspaper, which is available countrywide for R25. 

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 5

  • What a mystery! Who could it be? Maybe if there were cameras or an electronic footprint, this puzzle would be solved.

  • A SAP 13 store is a store room,where all exhibits are kept,that is used as evidence in a criminal case/s.It has a responsible police officer in charge.So basically you are a store manager,who has to make sure all your exhibits are accounted for.When an exhibit is booked out, by a detective for forensics(be it a fire arm, ammunition, bodily fluids ,knife, papers, records, furniture, etc) he must sign for it.When he picks it up from forensics he must sign for it.When he delivers it back, the Sap 13 officer must sign for it.Items can also be handed back to the lawful owners via a SAP 299 form, with instructions that it be kept available if needed as evidence in court.This is not rocket science.Theft from evidence rooms is an on going problem,lately it has become a major problem, due to no oversight by senior management station commanders etc.I am sure this is a major problem country wide, with a few exceptions.Do not discount cover ups by SAPS, as damage control is always applied.Transparency is not a strong point of SAPS.Criminals and lawyers must be laughing all the way, maybe if they create a specialized unit under Willie Hofmeyr, who do regular inspections , you might start addressing the problem.I don’t have high hopes for this happening.

  • Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted