X

This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

We made a promise to you that we’ll never erect a paywall and we intend to keep that promise. We also want to continually improve your reading experience and you can help us do that by registering with us. It’s quick, easy and will cost you nothing.



Nearly there! Create a password to finish up registering with us:


Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten


Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

Government rejects 10% pay hike demand by public sector...

Business Maverick

Business Maverick

Government rejects 10% pay hike demand by public sector trade unions 

(Photo: Gallo Images / Nardus Engelbrecht)
By Ray Mahlaka
20 May 2022 10

Instead of agreeing to a 10% pay hike, the government has proposed it continues to award SA’s 1.2 million public servants an after-tax cash gratuity of R1,000 a month in 2022, which would cost the fiscus R20.5bn. 

The government has rejected the demand by public sector trade unions for a 10% pay hike in 2022, which would cost the fiscus R49.2-billion to implement, saying it is unaffordable and exceeds its current budget to remunerate public servants. 

But the government is still committed to negotiating with trade unions, proposing that talks about their above-inflation pay hike demand be deferred to the next round of negotiations, covering the 2023/24 fiscal year. This round of negotiations is set to start in July and end in September 2022. 

The government has formally responded to the trade union demands, which were tabled in early May at the Public Service Coordinating Bargaining Council (PSCBC), where both parties negotiate the conditions of employment in the public sector. Public sector unions are still consulting their members and will formally respond to the government’s refusal to accept their demands at the PSCBC on 31 May. 

Instead of agreeing to a 10% pay hike, the government has proposed that it continues to award SA’s 1.2 million public servants an after-tax cash gratuity (or bonus) of R1,000 a month in 2022, which would cost the fiscus R20.5-billion. 

The National Treasury has budgeted for the cash gratuity in its 2022/23 expenditure framework and was always prepared to extend it for another year if it didn’t agree with unions about their remuneration demands. 

Business Maverick has obtained a document, tabled at the PSCBC, which details the government’s response to each of the trade union demands. In the document, the government said it proposes that the current dispensation of the cash gratuity for 2022/23 should continue as “any cost on the baseline would significantly disrupt the tabled fiscal framework”. In other words, the Treasury has not budgeted for a 10% pay increase in the current fiscal year because it is still committed to not awarding public servants an inflation-beating pay hike. Inflation measured at 5.9% in April, according to Statistics South Africa.

The Treasury wants to wrestle down the cost to remunerate public servants because, at R682.5-billion in 2022, it gobbles up 34% of the government’s total expenditure. Cutting the public sector remuneration bill will also pave the way for the government to reduce its ballooning government expenditure and debt. 

In addition to the cash gratuity, public servants will receive a 1.5% pay hike, known as “pay progression”, which is ordinarily awarded to public servants for their years of service or performance. The pay progression is always pencilled in by the Treasury in the public sector remuneration structure. 

The government said it is prepared to adjust the pay of public servants but it is only willing to accept proposals that don’t cost more than the R20.5-billion it has budgeted for during the 2022/23 fiscal year. 

Public sector trade unions, including the Public Servants’ Association (PSA), have interpreted this undertaking as the government being prepared to withdraw the cash gratuity and use the R20.5-billion to fund pay hikes that are below inflation. “This might not be favourable as it would reduce cash in the pocket for many employees,” the PSA, which claims to represent more than 235,000 public servants, said in an alert to its members. 

Other trade union demands include a R2,500 increase in the housing allowance afforded to public servants, the introduction of a bursary scheme for their children, relief funds for disaster periods such as Covid-related lockdowns, and measures that allow public servants to easily access pension savings if they fall on hard times.  

The government has rejected all demands on grounds that they are either unaffordable or it would be an administrative nightmare to implement. DM/BM

 

 

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 10

  • Good for Government – just stick to it and don’t give in. the public service should be halved anyway by getting rid of the tea drinkers and keep the good and dedicated public servants and yes, there are those.

  • These public servants need a taste of what the private sector has had for years now: no bonuses and expect retrenchment letters very soon. But that will never happen, of course, because this is 1.2 million guaranteed ANC votes every election.

  • 1.1m public servants, R680 billion annual cost. That makes for an AVERAGE R620,000 per year. We know nurses and teachers do not earn half of that and that there are a lot of teachers and nurses. So that would mean a few public servants must be paid incredible salaries. Might be worth a PAIA application and an article. After all, these must be proud servants that would want their comrades to know what dedication and hard work can provide

  • Why not be selective about a salary increase? Give more to the front line people such as teachers, nurses and law enforcement, and much less to those in places like Home Affairs, and the department of education.

    • I agree. We are bleeding nurses and teachers. It’s high time their salaries were made more competitive. The admin and clerical public servants can receive an adjustment and that’s all.

  • A union is there to get the best deal it can for its members, fair enough but, when every other sector of the country is shedding jobs and the government sector isn’t this is sticking the middle finger in the face of all tax payers.

  • The state has both its feet and hands in a bear trap that it set itself. Any solution will be painful. some will be terminal. Good luck, your time starts, er, 20 years ago.

  • Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted