- Finland wants security after Russian invasion of Ukraine
- Sweden expected to follow suit in bid to join alliance
- Ukraine forces aim to cut Russian battlefield supply lines
By Anne Kauranen and Jonathan Landay
The decision by the two Nordic countries to abandon the neutrality they maintained throughout the Cold War would be one of the biggest shifts in European security in decades. Moscow called Finland’s announcement a direct threat to Russia, and threatened retaliation, including unspecified “military-technical” measures.
It came even as Russia’s war in Ukraine was suffering another big setback, with Ukrainian forces driving Russian troops out of the region around the second largest city Kharkiv, the fastest Ukrainian advance since forcing Russia to withdraw from the capital and northeast more than a month ago.
In Geneva, the U.N. Human Rights Council passed a resolution to set up an investigation into possible war crimes by Russian troops in the Kyiv area and beyond before they were driven out at the end of March, a move that Russia said amounted to political score-settling. [nL5N2X43LS]
U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Michelle Bachelet said there were many examples of possible war crimes, including unlawful killings and summary executions. Read full story
Moscow denies deliberately attacking civilians.
NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg said the Finns would be “warmly welcomed” and promised a “smooth and swift” accession process. French President Emmanuel Macron said he fully supported Finland’s choice to join the alliance. Read full story
Finland’s 1,300-km (800-mile) border will more than double the length of the frontier between the U.S.-led alliance and Russia, putting NATO guards a few hours’ drive from the northern outskirts of St Petersburg.
“Finland must apply for NATO membership without delay,” President Sauli Niinisto and Prime Minister Sanna Marin said in a joint statement.
Asked whether Finland’s accession posed a direct threat to Russia, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said: “Definitely. NATO expansion does not make our continent more stable and secure.
“This cannot fail to arouse our regret, and is a reason for corresponding symmetrical responses on our side,” Peskov added.
Russia’s foreign ministry said Moscow would be forced to take “retaliatory steps, both of a military-technical and other nature”, giving no further details. Russian officials have spoken in the past about potential measures including stationing nuclear-armed missiles on the Baltic Sea.
‘YOU CAUSED THIS’
Asked on Wednesday if Finland would provoke Russia by joining NATO, Niinisto said: “My response would be that you caused this. Look at the mirror.” Read full story
Five diplomats and officials told Reuters that NATO allies expect both countries to be granted membership quickly, paving the way for an increased troop presence in the Nordic region to defend them during a one-year ratification period. Read full story
Putin, Russia’s president, cited NATO’s potential expansion as one of the main reasons he launched a “special military operation” in Ukraine in February.
NATO describes itself as a defensive alliance, built around a treaty declaring that an attack on one member is an attack on all, granting U.S. allies the protection of Washington’s superpower might including its nuclear arsenal.
Moscow regards that as a threat to its security. But Putin’s decision to invade Ukraine has changed Nordic public opinion, with many now embracing the view that Russia is a menace.
Finland in particular has centuries of uneasy history in Russia’s shadow.
Thursday also saw an intensification of disputes over Russian supplies of energy to Europe – still Moscow’s biggest source of funds and Europe’s biggest source of heat and power.
Moscow said it would halt gas flows to Germany through the main pipeline over Poland, while Kyiv said it would not reopen a pipeline route it shut this week unless it regains control of areas from pro-Russian fighters. Prices for gas in Europe surged. Read full story
COST OF THE WAR
Ukraine has spent 245.1 billion hryvnia ($8.3 billion) on fighting the Russian invasion, the finance minister said on Thursday, providing a glimpse into the scale of the spending on everything from buying and repairing weapons to emergency support for internally displaced people. Read full story
On the front lines, Ukraine has mounted a counter-offensive in recent days, ousting Russian forces from villages north and east of Kharkiv they had held since the start of the invasion.
Reuters journalists have confirmed that Ukraine is now in control of territory stretching to the banks of the Siverskiy Donets River, around 40 km (25 miles) east of Kharkiv. To the north, the Ukrainians have been pushing towards the Russian border. In the latest advance, they announced on Wednesday the recapture of the village of Pytomnyk, halfway to the frontier.
Ukraine’s general staff said the Russians were regrouping to prevent further Ukrainian advances near Kharkiv.
Russia’s retreat has begun to make it possible for some residents to return to recaptured villages around Kharkiv. But areas remain littered with mines and booby traps. The invasion has displaced more than 8 million people within Ukraine and the number of refugees who have fled the country now exceeds 6 million, U.N. data showed.
(Reporting by Reuters bureausWriting by Peter Graff, Alexandra HudsonEditing by Mark Heinrich, William Maclean and Andrew Heavens)
Putin, the evil KGB thug and mass murderer, and his hideous henchmen in the Kremlin must be the most stupid and moronic degenerates around! Are they too thick to realise that the more Putin beats the war drum, the more neighbouring countries will seek safety in numbers. All have witnessed the cruelty, mass murder, torture, rape and mindless destruction perpetuated by his diabolical forces – who in their right mind would ever want be subjected to that?? Congratulations to Finland and Sweden for being bold and not intimidated by these Russian psychopaths and monsters. They are not beholden to Russia or Putin – they are free nations and can chart their own path. The West must stand firm and confront Putin with steel – it is the only language this obnoxious bully understands. The DNA of Stalin and Hitler run very deep in madman!
Exactly
And South African ANC National Government still stands in a “neutral” position essentially supporting Putin and his henchmen.
Have the ANC Government ever done anything that makes us proud?
Why does Russia consider a country joining NATO a threat?
When has NATO been overtly aggressive to Russia?
Could Russia join NATO if it desired to and worked to meet the entrance criteria?
I’m not sure of the answers to the above questions, but it does seem to me that the “danger” NATO represents to Russia is largely manufactured synthetically by the Russian military elite for internal propaganda control of the Russian people.