South Africa


Bathabile Dlamini’s conviction inspires fresh hope for justice and sends a stern message to all public officials

Bathabile Dlamini’s conviction inspires fresh hope for justice and sends a stern message to all public officials
Then Social Development Minister Bathabile Dlamini appearing before Parliament’s Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) on March 7, 2017 in Cape Town, South Africa. Dlamini said that there was no “national crisis” regarding the payment of social grants. (Photo by Gallo Images / Beeld / Lulama Zenzile)

The judgment against the former social development minister demonstrates that there are consequences for failure and dereliction of duties.

The conviction on 9 March for perjury of former Minister of Social Development Bathabile Dlamini must send a stern message to all public officials, including those implicated in State Capture, that there are dire consequences for failing in their duties to the public.

The conviction by the Johannesburg Magistrates Court follows the decision of the Gauteng Director of Public Prosecutions to try Dlamini after her false testimony under oath to an inquiry established by the Constitutional Court stemming from the social grants crisis in 2017. This is the first conviction of a former Cabinet Minister for unlawful and criminal conduct committed in the course of duties as Minister.

Dlamini was called to testify before the inquiry in terms of section 38 of the Superior Courts Acts, held to determine several disputes about the administration of social grants by the South African Social Security Agency (Sassa), which falls under what was Dlamini’s department. In the inquiry, Dlamini testified on the role that she played as political head during the grants debacle, which involved the conclusion of an invalid contract with Cash Paymaster Services (CPS) for the rollout of social grants.

The end of the contract between CPS and Sassa is important in understanding the vulnerabilities of people who rely on social grants at the hands of politicians. As that contract was about to come to an end, millions of people who rely on grants were left wondering if they would be able to access them in the following months. Yet the former Minister adopted a nonchalant attitude in resolving this grave issue, putting the lives of these millions of people in jeopardy.

The Centre for Applied Legal Studies (Cals) represented the Black Sash Trust at the inquiry and presented evidence that the then-Minister had failed in her duties and had purposefully misled the Constitutional Court to avoid being held to account for these failures. The inquiry was chaired by Judge Bernard Ngoepe, whose report describes Dlamini as an evasive witness who failed to disclose information to the Court for fear of being held liable in her personal capacity.

In 2018, the Constitutional Court held that Dlamini had acted negligently and recklessly in failing to oversee the payment of grants. The court said she must pay a portion of the costs of litigation arising from the social grants crisis in her personal capacity. This was the first time that a Cabinet Minister was held personally liable to pay the costs of litigation arising from her conduct in the course of performing her duties as Minister. Payment of these costs was finally made in April 2021.

False evidence

The Constitutional Court also ordered that Judge Ngoepe’s report be forwarded to the National Director of Public Prosecutions to consider whether Dlamini had lied under oath and should be prosecuted for perjury. In August 2021, the Director of Public Prosecutions in Gauteng notified Cals that they would be prosecuting Dlamini for perjury. The decision was made three years after the Constitutional Court’s ruling in September 2018. In November 2021, Dlamini entered a plea of not guilty to the charge against her.

On 9 March 2022, Magistrate Betty Khumalo found that the former Minister had purposefully given false evidence under oath during the inquiry, when testifying that Sassa’s “work streams” — established to enable Sassa to take over the administration and payment of social grants after the contract with CPS had been declared invalid — did not report directly to her as Minister, when in fact they did. The former Minister had accordingly been untruthful when explaining the nature and processes of the administration of social grants during her tenure, a matter directly relevant to her political duties as Cabinet Minister, violating her oath of office to perform her duties in compliance with the Constitution, truthfully and conscientiously.

Dlamini’s conduct is especially serious because of the nature and scope of her duties and the mandate of her department to serve and promote the dignity of South Africa’s most vulnerable people by administering the social grants system.

Former Minister Dlamini had a duty to safeguard the public interest through her political office. Instead, she appears to have used the office for her own political gain. When given an opportunity to tell the truth and be held accountable for her actions, she chose to further disrespect the people of South Africa. When determining her sentence, it will be important for the court to consider these factors.

Looking forward to State Capture prosecutions

Although commentators may express their doubts, the conviction of Dlamini confirms that the arm of the law is long and can reach even those who think they are too mighty to be called to account.

Following the release of the full State Capture Report, we note that many government officials — including sitting and former Cabinet Ministers — have been implicated in wrongdoing by the State Capture Commission. The conviction of the former Minister confirms that even high-level state officials are bound to execute their duties both in a lawful manner and in the interest of the people that they serve. Failure to do so will indeed be met with dire consequences, including the possibility of both civil and criminal sanctions.

Dlamini’s conviction also affirms hope for our justice system. Such precedents create a fertile ground for the prosecution of other powerful political figures who misuse their powers, undermine our justice system and abuse their position to steal, manipulate and/or connive while their hands are in the state’s purse. No longer.

We look forward to supporting the National Prosecuting Authority as it undertakes the arduous process of prosecuting those implicated in state capture, and will continue to work to hold our society’s most powerful actors — both inside and outside of the formal political system — liable where they fail to uphold their constitutional duties. DM

Thuli Zulu is based at the Centre for Applied Legal Studies, Wits University.

Views expressed are not necessarily those of GroundUp.

First published by GroundUp.


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Fanie Rajesh Ngabiso says:

    What a lovely end to the week 😀

  • Rory Macnamara says:

    Perhaps this will be the start of really holding dishonest politicians to account.

  • Fiona Ronquest-Ross Ronquest-Ross says:

    Well said @ThuliZulu – “the arm of the law is long and can reach even those who think they are too mighty to be called to account.”
    May those long arms reach out like titanic tentacles and snuff out any other miscreants, coddled in their comfortable cocoons, lying and cheating the nation. No one should be above the law.

  • Madelein Jansen says:

    It offers little solitude when you see how slow the long arm of justice is. The outrage over these injustices from the self-serving politicians are long gone by the time these court cases come to a conclusion.

    • Pieter Malan says:

      Slow justice indeed. So many other professions like medical, engineering, accounting etc moved to digital, upgraded their systems and increased productivity. Sadly the legal profession is so disfunctional that it is unable to serve us. It would be nice to see performance records of the NPA. They could be more shameful that the crime stats.

  • Karsten Döpke says:

    Any word on sentencing?
    Must be custodial IMHO, otherwise state capture loot will be used to cover any fines.

  • Graeme de Villiers says:

    Cue the onset of a dread disease or a terminal smallenyama.
    Sentencing on 1 April, followed be appeals, demands, playing of all the cards, repeat.

  • J.F. Aitchison says:

    The URL doesn’t work. I get the following message.

    “This page isn’t working.”
    “ redirected you too many times”
    “Try clearing your cookies”

    I’ve cleared all cookie’s to no avail.

    My question is “Have you enabled editing of one’s comments?”
    Often, on reading a comment I’ve made after it has been posted, I’ve seen spelling mistake(s) or word(s) omitted, and would like to make the appropriate correction(s). Since there is no editing facility this can’t be done. Comments made on a YouTube article can be edited or deleted, but by ONLY the person who made the comment.
    When I saw that Daily Maverick was updating their comments policy, I was hoping that this facility had been added. If not please add it. Also, if possible, please consider adding the BOLD, Italics and Underline facitities.

    What will happen if my comment on an article, is the first, second or third? In which case there won’t be three comments to be reviewed by other subscribers.

  • Hilary Morris says:

    Just as distressing as this behaviour is, it’s almost worse that the ANC women’s league saw fit to confirm their support for her as their Chair – and this after the guilty verdict. Makes one think, doesn’t it?

    • Hulme Scholes says:

      ….. and it seems that this miserable liar is the most favoured candidate for leader of the ANCWL. You couldn’t make this up if you tried. What are they thinking?

  • Nick Miller says:

    The conviction will only have any effect if it is followed by a severe penalty-imprisonment.

  • Kevin Immelman says:

    Sadly, the chances of ever seeing this dubious character in orange overalls are as slim as ever seeing Jakob Regop having his day in court. The higher up the political food chain one goes the easier it is to slip the shackles of the law – “money talks” and the “law is an ass” are two of the epithets that spring to mind.

  • Ant Johnson says:

    Putin’s rule in Russia is a graphic example of how a kleptocracy can become a power hungry danger to regional as well as world peace. Not only this but also a devastating force suppressing people’s freedom and ability to create economic free enterprise development and through this relief from poverty and hope for a better future. In South Africa we are struggling to turn back from the kleptocratic tide of the Zuma years, the danger to our democracy is massive.
    The prosecution of Bathabile Dlamini is indeed a milestone along the way to recovery but we have a very long way to go and I remain unimpressed with the pace and apparent level of conviction behind the efforts.
    Not only that but the reaction of our government to the Ukraine invasion demonstrates that those in power here have little understanding of the dangers we face and it seems once again that the legacy of Apartheid remains paramount in thought processes and actions of our political elite. We continue to drive into the future with both eyes on the rear view mirror.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.7% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.3% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.3% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country.

Be part of that 0.3%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

MavericKids vol 3

How can a child learn to read if they don't have a book?

81% of South African children aged 10 can't read for meaning. You can help by pre-ordering a copy of MavericKids.

For every copy sold we will donate a copy to Gift of The Givers for children in need of reading support.