X

This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

We made a promise to you that we’ll never erect a paywall and we intend to keep that promise. We also want to continually improve your reading experience and you can help us do that by registering with us. It’s quick, easy and will cost you nothing.



Nearly there! Create a password to finish up registering with us:


Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten


Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

Standard Bank to end funding of new fossil fuel project...

Our Burning Planet

STANDARD BANK CLIMATE POLICY

Two steps forward for reducing fossil fuel funding, three steps back for the environment 

From left: Unsplash / Mike Marrah | Standard Bank on 21 July 2021 in Springs, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / OJ Koloti) | Unsplash / Ella Ivanescu

One of South Africa’s major lenders, Standard Bank, has reduced its fossil fuel funding loan book but continues financing gas and mining projects on the continent. 

Major financier Standard Bank Group (SBG) has said in its recently released climate policy that it would end funding of new fossil fuel projects by the year 2050 in an effort to achieve net zero emissions. 

“Between 2040-2045, SBG aims for an accelerated phase-out from non-renewable energy, except for instances where the use of such energy source can be justified as part of a clear and identifiable energy transition pathway, or where future advances in technology emerge to mitigate environmental impacts,” the group said in its climate policy. 

A recent report by BankTrack and 21 partners showed that SBG was in the top 10 global companies funding fossil fuel projects in Africa between 2016 and June 2021, with the group having paid $2.3-billion in that period

South African banks financed $8.4bn in African fossil fuel projects since 2016

Standard Bank – excluding its subsidiaries – has the highest fossil fuel exposure on its loan books in comparison to other major lenders in the country. Currently, almost 4% of its total lending consists of non-renewables at more than R60-billion. 

The group – including subsidiaries – has a 0.7% coal exposure and aims to have it lowered to 0.5% by 2030, the group said in the policy. 

SBG’s renewables loan book stands at about R13-million, and the group is aiming to provide an additional R50-billion for renewable energy plants over the next three years. Another R15-billion of financial risk – to be taken on by SGB for renewable power plants – is planned over the next three years. 

How armed gangs steal fuel worth millions from buried Transnet pipelines

The major lender, with subsidiaries in Uganda, Nigeria and Tanzania, among other African countries, said it also supported gas as a transitional fuel on the continent. The group cited its support for the fuel due to its lower emissions as compared to energy sources such as wood and coal. 

Gas has been touted as a suitable transitional fuel from coal due to its lower emissions and ability to provide baseload energy support, as opposed to concerns over that of renewable energy sources. 

However, methane leakage from the extraction and transporting of the fuel exacerbates the climate crisis as methane molecules are almost 90 times more effective at trapping atmospheric heat than carbon dioxide molecules.

Why the global methane pledge is a big deal for the climate

“… over the past several centuries, Africa has borne very considerable economic and human costs for other regions. A total or immediate ban on further transitional projects in Africa in order to help reduce environmental pressure in much richer regions would be a cost too far,” said Sim Tshabalala, Chief Executive of SBG. 

Although the group has said in its climate policy that it supports the Paris Agreement in transitioning the continent to a lower carbon economy, the lender will still finance mining projects in Africa and will also, depending on environmental authorisations, support the East African Oil Pipeline Project (EACOP). 

The project is expected to transport crude oil from Uganda through to Tanzania, with environmentalists in the region and globally sounding alarms over the environmental concerns and effects of the project. 

“The policy and targets published today are nowhere near aligned with the goals of the Paris Agreement, and instead indicate a willingness to continue financing projects and companies that will damage the climate and the health of people in the communities it is supposed to serve,” said Maaike Beenes, climate campaign lead for BankTrack, in a statement. DM/OBP

Gallery
Absa OBP

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 1

  • The banks and investment industry (those organisations that opaquely investment private funds through institutional mechanisms) purport to follow investment and lending practices that are aligned with international agreements for the reduction in the rate of global warming and in support of the MDGs. However, their actions display an absence of corporate integrity as they pursue short term profits at the cost of long term harm. This indicates poor governance and reflects an urgent need for more informed and capable board members to keep the executive management in check.

  • Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted