South Africa


First successful private prosecution for murder in South Africa will be felt ‘for a long way to come’

First successful private prosecution for murder in South Africa will be felt ‘for a long way to come’
Rochelle Naidoo. (Photo: Supplied)

On 28 June 2005, the night Rochelle Naidoo and Faizel Hendricks argued in her Observatory, Cape Town, flat, Hendricks shoved a revolver into Naidoo’s mouth and pulled the trigger. Here’s why SA’s first successful private prosecution for murder is significant.

It took 17 years, but on 12 January 2022, in the Western Cape High Court, judges Deidre Kusevitsky and Chantel Fortuin found that a trial court in 2015 had been correct in convicting Faizel Hendricks of the murder of his partner Rochelle Naidoo.

Naidoo, originally from Pietermaritzburg, had moved to Cape Town to work in a branch of the family business. She was living in Observatory at the time.

After Hendricks’ initial arrest, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) declined to prosecute and in 2006 withdrew the matter after an inquest delivered an “undecided” verdict.

It was then that Naidoo’s parents, Yusuf and Sara Asmall, opted to prosecute Hendricks privately and hired advocate Gideon Scheltema to lead the matter.

Hendricks was charged with murder and found guilty in 2014 in the Malmesbury Magistrates’ Court. In May 2016, he was handed a 15-year sentence.

After the conviction, Hendricks lodged several appeals, stating that Naidoo had committed suicide. In December 2018, Hendricks was granted, via petition, leave to appeal against the conviction.

Judges Kusevitsky and Fortuin on Wednesday, however, found that “the deceased most certainly did not inflict the injuries she had to herself. It is also improbable that she would have shoved a revolver all the way down her throat given the fact that her jaw had been broken.”

Speaking to Tania Broughton of the Sowetan, Naidoo’s father said that he hoped the verdict “makes others realise that, at the end of the day, you can get justice. It has come at a great cost, and not everyone can afford it. And that’s the sad part of it.”

There are two types of private prosecution available to South Africans seeking justice – by invoking section 7 of the Criminal Procedure Act, on the issuance of a “nolle prosequi” by the DPP, or by applying section 8 of the act of private prosecution by statutory right.

Writing in the legal journal De Rebus in August 2021, legal consultant Sipho Nkosi set out that the framework for all prosecutions is established through the Constitution, the National Prosecuting Authority Act, and the Criminal Procedure Act (CPA).

Nkosi noted that in South African law there are two types of private prosecutions available.

“First, private prosecution by an individual under section 7 of the [CPA] on the basis of a certificate issued by the Director of Public Prosecutions … and, secondly, private prosecution by statutory right under section 8 of the [CPA].” 

The latter type, he noted, could be undertaken by both “natural and juristic persons on the basis of specific pieces of legislation and requires no certificate from the DPP”. 

In such a case, the DPP withdraws the right to prosecute and allows a statutory body or an individual to prosecute certain offences.

He cites the circumstances under which such a prosecution may be sought, including by “any private person who proves some substantial and peculiar interest in the issue… arising out of some injury which he individually suffered in consequence of the commission of the said offence”.

This includes “a husband, if the said offence was committed in respect of his wife; the wife or child or, if there is no wife or child, any of the next of kin of any deceased person, if the death of such person is alleged to have been caused by the said offence”.

A legal guardian or curator may also “institute and conduct a prosecution in respect of such offence in any court competent to try that offence”.

After Hendricks’ conviction was confirmed, Scheltema wrote: “What has just happened hasn’t been a victory that calls for congratulations or celebrations. Instead, it has been a mere vindication of a mother’s love for her daughter and her belief that she did not commit suicide.”

He added that the Asmalls should be “respected for their role in taking on a case of this magnitude and their efforts to stamp out gender-based violence. The importance of this prosecution will be felt for a long way to come. As I say in the book, violence against defenceless women strikes at the soul of a nation.” DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • jcdville stormers says:

    Firstly,congratulations to the mother.Secondly given south Africa’s violence against women and children, the police have failed to change the behavior of men towards gender based violence.Mainly because their is a lax attitude to address the problem,and it starts in the charge office ,where complainants are often shown away.It has become practice to try and talk complainants out of making a case,or telling them they have no case.Mainly because of laziness to write and complete a docket.Which shows that your shift commander does not ensure accountability,this runs up all the way to senior management.

    • Coen Gous says:

      Thank you Marianne for posting this article. Agree with JC, this certainly is a break-through for private prosecutions. The failure of the police to treat cases of GBV seriously is a major, major concern. Unfortunately, many similar cases will just remain cold, because the victims simply do not have the financial means to even consider private prosecution. Surely there must be separate units within the police to deal exclusively with GBV, and these units must report to an office removed from the police branch in the area where the crime was committed.
      Due to the failures of the police and the DDP in some cases to prosecute, private prosecutions will become more vital in future. However, being a good prosecutor takes many years of experience, especially if the case is complex, like corruption, money laundering, and the like

    • Coen Gous says:

      What I really would like to know from JC, or anyone else that is knowledgeable, is how serious does the police take cases where the crime was committed by a policeman. Particularly where the victim is in the lower socio-economic group, like homeless people. Is there not a tendency to “protect their own”? We know that it is a major problem in the US, in particular relating to cross race incidents (like the George Floyd matter)

      • jcdville stormers says:

        All policemen and women are sensitivised to gbv and domestic violence issues.The problem is control and command and accountability.A good station commander will make sure that the specific registers as regards gbv and domestic violence are kept up to date,by checking on the shift commanders.Unfortunately I’m talking about what should be 2nd nature for all policemen and women, in practice this does not happen and will differ from station to station.

  • Rod H MacLeod says:

    Courage is grace under pressure, as Hemingway said.

    Dead fish go with the flow – that requires no effort at all. But parents Yusuf and Sara – you are heroes with grace.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted