South Africa


SOE contracts with Guptas’ New Age newspaper were unlawful, State Capture report finds

SOE contracts with Guptas’ New Age newspaper were unlawful, State Capture report finds
Atul Gupta at the launch of the national daily newspaper The New Age on 21 July 2010 in Sandton, South Africa. (Photo: Gallo Images / City Press / Leon Sadiki)

State Capture thrived at state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and some government departments because executives and senior officials flouted the law in aid of the Gupta-owned The New Age newspaper.

The Zondo Commission says its investigation has confirmed that State Capture “thrived” at South Africa’s state-owned enterprises and government departments because senior officials and/or executives flouted the law.

Those officials permitted the conclusion of millions of rands in unlawful contracts between the Gupta-owned The New Age (TNA) newspaper and Transnet, Eskom and South African Airways between 2011 and 2017. 

As part of a broad mandate, the commission examined the unjustified spending on The New Age by the three parastatals and found that the Public Finance Management Act “ clearly and definitively” made every one of the contracts entered into with TNA unlawful. 

The State Capture Commission, established to examine allegations of fraud and corruption in the public sector and the role played by the Gupta family and/or former president Jacob Zuma, concluded three years of public hearings in August 2021. 

It released the findings about The New Age in the first of three reports handed to President Cyril Ramaphosa on Tuesday.

“TNA serves as an example of the way in which State Capture took hold in South Africa. It shows the extent of the Guptas’ influence in the public sector in South Africa as well as the Guptas’ strategy to replace officials that were not compliant with their looting scheme,” the report reads. 

Judicial Commission of Inquiry Into State Capture Report_Part 1

Government departments and state-owned enterprises used scarce public resources to secure advertising in or sponsorships with TNA that defied logic and legal requirements, the commission found. 

And State Capture thrived because people in positions of power and authority flouted the law, the report states. 

It named, among others, former Transnet and Eskom chief executives Brian Molefe and Collin Matjila among a group labelled “facilitators” of the Gupta-owned TNA racket. 

Law enforcement must investigate Molefe and Matjila for possible fraud and corruption or contravention of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) for their roles in contracts awarded.

Given Molefe’s role in the conclusion of some of the TNA contracts at Transnet, “particularly his misrepresentation” that some contracts were partnerships when they were sponsorships, the commission wants law enforcement to conduct further investigations with a view to prosecuting him for fraud and/or contravention of the PFMA.

At Eskom, the report found that Matjila had been a “key facilitator” of the same TNA project. 

Shortly after he took up the position of acting CEO, Matjila approved the largest sponsorship contract with TNA that Eskom had ever entered into. 

“He did so despite not having the authority to enter into a contract of this size and at a time when there was no evidence of any value to be derived from the services offered by TNA,” the report states. 

Matjila had approved a sponsorship of R43-million when the delegation of authority was limited to just R3-million. 

He had failed to respond to official notices served on him by the commission and had ignored other attempts by the commission to try to get his version. 

In addition to Matjila, the report also deemed the Eskom board, appointed in December 2014, as “a facilitator” – partly for having ratified the sponsorship deal in question. 

This board, appointed in the months following the appointment of Lynne Brown as the minister of public enterprises, has been widely described as a “Gupta board”.

In the case of TNA, the commission found that this board had been “content” to ratify a very controversial contract, where it had not assessed its commercial value, and in circumstances where the media, Parliament and the Public Protector had expressed grave concern about the legality thereof. 

The commission found that former Eskom board chairman Zola Tsotsi had concealed important information from that board.

And it has left it up to law enforcement to continue with investigations into individual board members. 

The commission found that one of the earliest acts of State Capture by the Guptas was to secure the removal of Themba Maseko, the former director-general of the Government Communication and Information System (GCIS).   

Maseko had resisted the Gupta family’s pressure on him to divert government spending to their then fledgling media company. 

Maseko was soon shafted as a result when the Guptas, relying on the influence they exerted over Zuma, had him removed. 

This, the commission said, was an example of how a well-performing and principled public servant was removed at “lightning speed” when he refused to accede to the Gupta demands to divert millions of rands of public money to enrich their media business. 

Zuma then had Maseko replaced with a“facilitator” in the form of Mzwanele Manyi, the report states.  

The commission found that millions of rands were spent on TNA in circumstances where there was no credible readership information or certified circulation figures for the newspaper during Manyi’s term at the GCIS. 

It is inconceivable that this would have been allowed to take place if Maseko had remained at the helm of the GCIS. DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • MIKE WEBB says:

    Jimmy Manye. Ha, Ha, Ha. Of course Jimmy will have more than a mouthful to explain his innocence.

  • Alley Cat says:

    Imagine if Zuma and his puppets had applied their considerable business skills to move our beloved country forward. Maybe I am naïve but I never cease to be amazed at the devious ways they cooked up to steal our money.
    I noticed the New Age appearing at many SOE buildings during this time and naively thought that they must have been delivered as freebies because the SOE’s that I visited for business meetings were already going downhill due to lack of funds.

  • Gavin Craythorne says:

    Good piece Jessica. Shafted is the one word. Shot is the other. Whistleblowers get shafted if they are lucky, shot if not.

  • Johan Buys says:

    Could DM please do a parallel article on Zondo reports for where the implicated people are now and other relevant info?

    There might be a pattern…

    We would love to know what kind of firm would after Zondo hearings employ the likes of Myeni, Molefe, Moyani, Kwinana, Manye, Gigaba, Zwane etc etc.

    They got used to power and first class lifestyles, very doubtful they took to volunteering at soup kitchens.

    • Coen Gous says:

      Gigaba and Zwane still part of ANC NEC, I think, and Manye, well, the spokesperson for the Zuma Foundation, a very, very important job, as REC members will testify

  • Bruce Anderson says:

    My concern is that in the highlighting that action should be taken, the perps are even more incentivised to dissipate the assets illegally acquired. All passports of people against whom action is recommended should be surrendered. Molefe allegedly has a massive house under construction in Bishopscourt, others have properties on the Atlantic seaboard and elsewhere. Surely these assets can/must be identified and “secured” pending court action. Mind you, the Deeds Office is such a shambles, it is effectively a restraint order on its own.

    • Johan Buys says:

      Bruce: one good thing, SARS has unfettered ability to go back in time, to penetrate corporate and trust secrecy, to apply penalties plus interest, to attach assets and as that Gupta guy found out, to jail people.

      The parties that better also be very nervous are the banks’ private wealth offices. Did their account managers dutifully apply their minds to KYC, FICA and source of funds responsibilities before allowing transfers of funds, especially out of SA.

      It is very concerning how easily that cash in transit business involved with SA Express and North West was able to receive transfers, turn these into physical cash and so make it disappear. The amounts are huge, tens of millions. It should not be possible to spend that on property transfer or cars without the flags going up. Maybe some lawyers are equally nervous about what they kept quiet about.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.8% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.2% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.2% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country.

Be part of that 0.2%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options