First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.7% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.3% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.3% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

We need so many more of our readers to join them. The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country. We are inundated with tip-offs; we know where to look and what to do with the information when we have it – we just need the means to help us keep doing this work.

Be part of that 0.3%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Court denies interdict to stop Shell's Wild Coast offsh...

Our Burning Planet

OFFSHORE EXPLORATION

Blow for environmental activists as they fail to convince court to stop Shell’s planned seismic survey on the Wild Coast

Environmental activists from Extinction Rebellion and other organisations protest outside the head offices of Shell in Sandton, Johannesburg, South Africa, 01 December 2021. The protest is aimed at stopping the seismic survey by Shell that will be carried out for between four to five months, 20km off the coast between Morgans Bay and Port St Johns of the east coast of South Africa. (Photo: EPA-EFE/KIM LUDBROOK)

The Makhanda High Court has given Shell the nod to go ahead with the seismic survey on the Wild Coast after dismissing an urgent interim interdict application on Friday morning.

The Makhanda High Court has given Shell the nod to go ahead with the seismic survey on the Wild Coast after dismissing an urgent interim interdict application on Friday morning.

The Border Deep Sea Angling Association (BDSAA), the Kei Mouth Ski Boat Club, human rights law agency Natural Justice and environmental movement Greenpeace lost their urgent interim interdict to stop Shell from blasting the Eastern Cape Wild Coast.

Acting Judge Avinash Govindjee dismissed the application, with costs for two counsels.

Delivering the judgment, Govindjee said the applicants failed to convince the court and that the survey’s delay would prejudice Shell financially.

“The balance of convenience is in favour of Shell. In the urgent application, the applicants have failed to produce evidence that there is a genuine apprehension of irreparable harm to the marine environment particularly given the mitigation measures that Shell would put in place in line with the environmental management programme [EMP],” he said.

Govindjee said Shell indicated that it has already spent millions of dollars preparing for the survey.

“If the interdict is granted this would be lost and it would be in contractual breach of an exploration right that was obtained years ago,” he said.

Govindjee said weighing up massive financial consequences against the possible harm to the environment, the evidence favoured Shell.

“With mitigation processes in place the irreparable harm would be minimised,” he said.

He said the applicants had successfully established that there had been no undue delay in bringing the case and the urgency of the matter justified the departure from the usual rules so that the matter could be heard urgently.

“The public interest in this case is palpable,” he said.

But Gavindjee expressed doubts as to whether the applicants would succeed in reviewing and setting aside the grant in 2014 of the exploration right (because of how much time had elapsed) or of the first renewal application because the lapsing of that renewal meant that the issue was now moot.

“In the second renewal application, the applicants had succeeded in establishing that they had prima facie prospects of success due to the apparently inadequate public participation.

Natural Justice issued a statement after the ruling, saying they were dismayed that the court had dismissed their application without granting their request to be allowed to return to court to make further representations and present expert evidence, and awarded costs against them despite the fact that the application was made in the public interest to protect the ocean and coastal environment.

“The applicants had anticipated being able to present further expert evidence of irreparable harm on the return date. The application had to be made on a hyper-urgent basis [as a consequence of Shell’s actions and the inactions of the Minister of Mineral Resources and Energy] which meant that it had not been possible for experts to finalise detailed reports and affidavits by the time the application was launched,” read the statement.

They said the applicants would be discussing the judgment with their legal advisers to decide whether or not to apply for leave to appeal against these aspects of the judgment.

“In the interim, we will be doing all we can to support the application made [on Thursday] on behalf of Wild Coast communities who are seeking to interdict the seismic surveys on the basis that Shell does not have an environmental authorisation to undertake them,” read the statement.

Happy Khambule, senior climate and energy campaign manager for Greenpeace Africa said the decision was very disappointing.

“Not only will the blasting destroy precious biodiverse ecosystems, but it will also destroy the livelihoods of local communities, all in the name of profit,” he said.

Khambule said they will continue to support the nationwide resistance against Shell and pursue the legal avenue to stop Shell.

“We must do everything we can to undo the destructive colonial legacy of extractivism, until we live in a world where people and the planet come before the profits of toxic fossil fuel companies,” said Khambule.

Pooven Moodley, executive director of Natural Justice, said the outcome was unfortunate, since the judge did not recognise the urgency of the interdict and the immediate threat the seismic surveys pose to the environment, marine life and local communities.

“Our fight to safeguard the Wild Coast is not over, and our bigger struggle for climate justice, and to resist oil and gas drilling in South Africa and across the entire continent is far from over. As activists, civil society and lawyers, we cannot relax – the climate crisis is upon us, and fossil fuel companies accelerating the crisis are posing a serious threat to the planet, our livelihoods, human rights and very existence. We will fight them on the beaches and in court,” said Moodley.

John Rance, chair of Kei Mouth Skiboat Club called the ruling “unthinkable”.
“We’re saddened by the result but happy we did all we could under the circumstances. The seismic survey may go ahead, but there’s going to be one helluva shindig before mining starts.”

“Shell and its shareholders should be ashamed of themselves. We should all be telling our investment advisers and pension funds to disinvest from Shell. It’s the only language they understand,” he said.

John Luef of the Border Deep Sea Angling Association said they are extremely disappointed with the outcome of the hearing.

“This is not the end; we will continue to fight for our local people, their heritage and the environment. We call on South Africans to stand together and protest this invasive and environmentally harmful seismic survey, as well as any future mining plans,” he said.

Amadiba Crisis Committee spokesperson Nonhle Mbuthuma said the judgment will not deter their communities.

“Our application will be heard on 14 December 2021. Amadiba is represented by Amadiba resident Sinegugu Zulu of the NPO Sustaining the Wild Coast and by Mashona Wetu, induna in our Head Women’s Council of Umgungundlovu, on the Amadiba coast, as well as four representatives of fishing communities along the Wild Coast,” she said.

Mbuthuma said their court case is very clear.

“Shell doesn’t have an environmental authorisation. Meanwhile, the preparation for the march against Shell on Sunday, 5 December continues. The villages on the coast start our march at Mnyameni river mouth at 9am, heading for the Mzamba river estuary. We will meet protesters gathering at 10am at Wild Coast Sun and going to Mzamba and hold a joint protest meeting,” Mbuthuma said.

She said it is time for the government to respect the rights and the economies of South Africa’s indigenous communities.

“To respect Mother Nature, this is the mother that feeds us all. Without her we are nothing,” she said. DM/OBP

Gallery
Absa OBP

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 10

  • Quite clearly every protestor should immediately cease using any form of petrol/diesel powered transport. This would have the triple benefit of reducing traffic, pollution and the fuel price. When there is no profit to be made from hydrocarbons Shell will pack up and go home.

    • They just want to sacrifice the poor to show how virtuous their eco-fantasies are. They want to deny employment and betterment to South Africans so they can have a pretty place to play in. Selfish and disgraceful.

  • Just because it’s legal does not make it ethical or humane! Lots of awfully bad things across history were ‘legal’ in their countries at the time. The law is an ass unless we apply it through the prism of principled values.

  • I am not surprised by this ruling. Just think about some of the other orange overall candidates still enjoying the fruits of other people’s labour.

  • Mining Minister Mantashe is (S)hell-bent on promoting fossil fuels. Did Shell also pay for security upgrades and more to his private home a la Bosasa? Where does our Minister of Environment Affairs, Barbara Creecy stand in this scandalous saga? And what of the 10 February 2021 High Court judgment against Mineral Sands’ nefarious mining activities on the West Coast? The least that the acting judge in Makhanda could have done was to allow the applicants an opportunity to present more expert evidence. After all, Shell had had since 2014 to launch the seismic surveys. The reputational damage to the energy behemoth will reverberate a thousand times more than their underwater seismic cannons in years to come.

  • One of the things I admire about the Daily Maverick is the level of research that you do and the detailed way you pull apart the nonsense that some politicians and some so called experts spout.
    I was therefore horrified to read this erroneous, misleading and appallingly written piece. The Judge who heard the emergency interdict, clearly had done a lot more homework than the Maverick.
    Did you actually read the environmental conditions that Shell (and all other offshore operators) have to work under. Do you know what “soft starts” are or what “MMOs” do and what authority they have, have you read any of the 100s of studies on marine seismic operations that have been commissioned over the years?
    Promulgating this comical pseudo science in which seismic vessels “blast” and offshore O&G companies “mine” undermines the Mavericks excellent reputation for research and speaking the truth and condemns South Africa to mine (correct usage) and burn coal for decades to come in an attempt to keep the lights on. You owe your readers an apology for this woke travesty.
    As an aside, were it not for the Oil and Gas industry there would be no whales to impact – they would long ago have been converted to lamp oil and candles.

  • Seriously? ‘Prejudice Shell financially’!! Is the judge in his right mind? Aren’t they one of the richests companies in the world? And to dismiss the application with costs! I am beyond disgusted!!

  • The comments attributed to Khambule in this article explain just why so many well meaning environmental protection efforts fail-extremism does not go down well with those who have to pay for it. Very shallow article, with no real understanding of the EMP.

    • No need to shoot the messenger. I actually think Tembile Sgqolana wrote a well-rounded piece. If you want shallow, then rather take on Shell’s CEO for his remark in a radio interview along the lines of “the benefits (of the Wild Coast seismic survey) are far too much to list”.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted