X

This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

We made a promise to you that we’ll never erect a paywall and we intend to keep that promise. We also want to continually improve your reading experience and you can help us do that by registering with us. It’s quick, easy and will cost you nothing.



Nearly there! Create a password to finish up registering with us:


Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten


Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

Shell to go ahead with Wild Coast seismic survey despit...

Our Burning Planet

OFFSHORE EXPLORATION

Shell to go ahead with Wild Coast seismic survey despite backlash and Express Petroleum pullout

Protesters at the Waterfront in Cape Town on 21 November 2021 awaiting the arrival of the Amazon Warrior. They are against the planned Shell seismic survey for oil and gas in the ocean. (Photo: Gallo Images / Brenton Geach)

With Shell’s planned Wild Coast seismic survey starting on Wednesday, Border Deep Sea Angling Association says it will go to court to stop the survey, while Express Petroleum has cut ties with Shell.

With only a day to go before a seismic survey in search of oil and gas starts on the Eastern Cape’s Wild Coast, the backlash continues between Shell and environmental activists who are calling for the survey to be halted.

Cullinan & Associates, acting on behalf of Border Deep Sea Angling Association’s (BDSAA’s), Kei Mouth Ski Boat Club and Natural Justice, sent follow-up letters to the Ministry of Mineral Resources and Energy, and Ministry of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment on November 23.

On Friday, Express Petroleum, a fuel supplier that owns 35 stations in the Eastern Cape, cut ties with Shell and dropped Shell branding from all its stations and vehicles.

However, Shell on Monday said it was continuing with the survey.

Over the weekend Daily Maverick reported that Shell’s planned seismic survey off the Wild Coast, which is due to begin on Wednesday, is just one of several offshore exploration projects under way or planned along the coast of South Africa. No less than four other explorations are in the pipeline or have already begun.

A petition – initially addressed to Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment Minister Barbara Creecy and subsequently addressed to Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe – to withdraw approval for the Shell seismic survey had attracted 341,456 signatures by Monday.

Creecy has distanced herself and her department from the fallout. Spokesperson Albi Modise said Creecy and the environment department had not been involved in the decision-making process for the proposed exploration activities. 

He said the application process had been finalised before the One Environmental System, which serves to integrate different aspects of the environmental management of mining activities, came into effect in December 2014.

He said the authorisation had been granted in 2014 under the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act by the then minister of Mineral Resources, Ngoako Ramatlhodi.

Mantashe, the current minister, has declined to comment on the matter.

BDSAA Vice-Chair John Luef on Monday said BDSAA members are furious about the planned seismic survey.

“We have sent a very strong letter of objection to the Minister of Forestry, Fisheries and Environment, Barbara Creecy. Our lawyers, Cullinan & Associates, have sent follow-up letters,” he said.

Luef said it is ludicrous that the survey is even being considered as an option by the government in any of SA’s coastal waters, “let alone the extremely biodiverse and sensitive Wild Coast. We will not take this lying down and we will do all in our power to put a stop to it.”  

He said the seismic blasting is a pending disaster and “that is why all citizens of this country should get involved with putting a stop to this absolute madness”.

BDSAA was taking this stance, said Luef, because:

  • There is no evidence, scientific or other, that seismic blasting will not harm the extreme biodiversity of the Wild Coast and possibly create damage, confusion and even death to the many species of life in the ocean.
  • The Wild Coast is home to endemic species such as the red steenbras, seventy-four and wreckfish as well as many other species of fish such as the dageraad, which are endangered to the verge of total collapse, and the planned blasting will take place in and adjacent to their breeding grounds.
  • There is no proof or research available as to what damage will be done to the marine protected areas (MPAs) adjacent to the blasting. BDSAA members have noticed a significant increase in the catch rates of many species in recent times and this can be attributed, among  other reasons, to how well the MPAs are working by fish becoming overpopulated and migrating out of the MPAs. All the hard work of protection in the past may come to nothing.
  • The whole world is moving towards greener energy, yet our government, which attended COP26, has agreed to go ahead with this potential environmental disaster in a search for fossil fuels.

“The SA government and Minister Creecy are doing a 180 [degree turn] on what they have publicly stated is their mandate to facilitate an economic growth path that is equitable, inclusive, sustainable and environmentally sound. A path that is in line with our Constitution, promotes sustainable development and the right of all of us to enjoy an environment that is not harmful to our health or wellbeing. Proof that our sea creatures and environment will not be affected is what we want,” Luef said.

He said that BDSAA had formed the first three MPAs in Border waters, policed them and punished any of their members caught fishing in them. 

“We eventually managed to get these MPAs to be promulgated into law by the government and have continually involved ourselves with policing them and environmental issues concerning the future of our heritage. We are proud of our involvement. BDSAA sees this seismic blasting as a pending disaster,” he said.

Express Petroleum last week said they are extremely passionate about South Africa and care deeply for the future sustainability of its coastline.

“We would like to make all our customers and concerned citizens aware that Express Petroleum are in no way involved nor do we support the much published seismic blasting occurring off the Wild Coast of South Africa by Shell,” said the company.

Express Petroleum said they had already been procuring product from alternative sources and had started debranding all of their co-branded retail sites as well as removing all Shell branding from their company vehicles and assets.

A Shell spokesperson on Monday said they are engaging with Express Petroleum directly.

“We plan to go ahead with the survey, because we have met all our legal obligations for the survey,” she said. DM/OBP

Gallery
Absa OBP

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 8

  • One is allowed to destroy the earth as long as it is for a noble cause like the profits of a corporate. Time to rethink the power the world has given a group of people acting under a juristic person.

  • Our president, 69 year old Cyril said at COP26:
    “Funding offered through the Political Declaration [announced at COP26] will be used for targeted programmes of reskilling and up-skilling, creating employment and providing other forms of support to ensure workers, women and youth are the major beneficiaries of our shift to a greener future.”
    …and a young lady who commented on our leaders: “…they’ve now had 30 years of Blah, Blah, Blah and where has that led us? We can still turn this around – it is entirely possible. It will take immediate, drastic annual emission reductions. But not if things go on like today. Our leaders’ intentional lack of action is a betrayal toward all present and future generations.”

  • Shell believes it has followed the law and will proceed, as is their right.

    Motorist can choose to boycott all Shell fuel stations, as is their right.

  • Back in 1986 Shell was targeted by the international anti-apartheid movement for not divesting in South Africa … I guess all is forgiven and the gravy train rolls on!

  • Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted