This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

The news sucks. But your reading experience doesn't have to. Help us improve that for you by registering for free.

Please create a password or click to receive a login link.

Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.7% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.3% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.3% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

We need so many more of our readers to join them. The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country. We are inundated with tip-offs; we know where to look and what to do with the information when we have it – we just need the means to help us keep doing this work.

Be part of that 0.3%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Free Market Foundation stands its ground against claims...

Business Maverick


Free Market Foundation stands its ground against claims of mismanagement of donor funds

(Image: Adobe Stock)
By Tim Cohen
17 Nov 2021 0

The Free Market Foundation has dismissed charges that it has mismanaged the contributions of donors and that its board was unconstitutionally elected, in a precursor to a legal fight that threatens to split the organisation.

It’s the kind of dispute that any NGO would bend over backwards to avoid: long-standing members at loggerheads, a looming legal battle, allegations of the mismanagement of donor funds — all on top of fundamental differences about the direction of the organisation. 

At a media conference on Wednesday, FMF chair Rex van Schalkwyk said it was “entirely false” that the organisation has become a “right-wing echo chamber”. He said the organisation was committed to continuing its decades-long advocacy work for economic freedom, personal liberties and an open, transparent South African society.

He also refuted claims that the current board was not constitutionally elected at its AGM in 2020. The issue is at the heart of a legal action brought by one of the FMF’s members, Michael Hull. He is seeking a legal injunction declaring the election of the current board to have been unconstitutional. 

Behind this action lies a convoluted dispute, but the central issue appears to be whether the FMF should “confront” government and socialist-orientated political parties, or try to work with government where it can, in order to make specific policy changes. 

The latter approach has long been that of the FMF, supported by the founder of the organisation and its central figure, Leon Louw. 

To complicate matters, one of the FMF’s most popular programmes, Khaya Lam, was given a huge donation — at least by the FMF’s standards — two years ago by Remgro and Richemont chairman Johann Rupert. The R50-million donation transformed the FMF from a perennially struggling, underfunded NGO into a financially viable and functional organisation. 

The Khaya Lam project seeks to provide township dwellers with title to homes they have lived in for decades, and fits with the FMF’s notions of activating “dead equity”. The programme appears to have at least some support across the political spectrum.

At its media conference, finance committee member and former chair Ayanda Khumalo said accusations of financial mismanagement at the Free Market Foundation are defamatory and absolutely without merit. 

A recent forensic audit (initiated by a donor) found such allegations to be baseless. 

“In fact,” Khumalo said, “the donor who commissioned the audit donated a further R8-million to the Free Market Foundation on the back of that audit report.”

He did, however, acknowledge that some of the expenses of the FMF itself were borne by the Khaya Lam project, without specifying the precise amounts. About 30% of the FMF’s overheads were carried by Khaya Lam, in line with the work the FMF itself was doing on the project. 

Van Schalkwyk, a retired judge, said the court action, apart from the issues claimed, suffered from a fatal flaw, which is that it was simply brought too late — almost a year after the disputed AGM. 

The board’s critics did not immediately respond to the claims made at the media conference. A court date has not yet been set. BM/DM


Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

No Comments, yet

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted