Business Maverick

Steel Strike

Crippling steel strike intensifies as Numsa rejects improved salary increase offer 

The National Engineering Strike on October 05, 2021 in Johannesburg, South Africa. The National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (NUMSA) called on all engineering workers across the country to down tools and fight for a living wage. (Photo: Gallo Images/Sharon Seretlo)

Numsa members are prepared to settle on Seifsa’s 6% salary increase offer. But the trade union will only do so if it is guaranteed that the percentage increase is reflected on the hourly rates that workers earn in the steel industry. 

The strike in SA’s steel and engineering industry, which has persisted for over a week and left shop floors at factories across the country abandoned, is set to continue after the National Union of Metalworkers of SA (Numsa) rejected an improved salary increase offer from employers.

The strike started on 5 October and has been painful for workers, employers, the beleaguered steel industry, and SA’s broken economy.  

Workers affiliated with Numsa have lost about R100-million in salary payments since the nationwide industrial action started because employers have implemented a “no work, no pay” policy.  Employers such as vehicle maker BMW are already reporting disruptions in the supply of steel (used in the manufacturing of vehicles) and slower production activity at its local factory. 

The Steel and Engineering Industries Federation of Southern Africa (Seifsa), the sector’s largest employer body that represents 18 organisations, has sweetened its 2021 salary increase offer for Numsa members — increasing it to 6% from 4.4%.  

The 6% would be for lowest-paid workers and 5% for highest-paid workers.

But Numsa, which represents over 100,000 workers in the steel industry, has rejected the improved offer saying it doesn’t translate to actual salary increases for workers. 

Numsa general secretary Irvin Jim said its members are prepared to settle on Seifsa’s 6% salary increase offer. But the trade union will only do so if it is guaranteed that the percentage increase is reflected on the hourly rates that workers earn in the steel industry. 

“Our members said we can consider taking the [salary increase] offer, on condition that Seifsa is prepared to pay it on actual rates of pay and not on minimum payments.  As things stand, they are not willing to pay on the actual rates. So, there is no agreement that exists between us and Seifsa,” said Jim. 

There’s also no salary agreement between workers and other steel employer bodies including the Consolidated Employers Organisation, National Employers Association of SA, and SA Engineers & Founders Association.

Numsa, which pushed for an 8% salary increase, also wants the 6% to be across the board or offered to all workers regardless of their salary and skills level. 

Jim fired a threat to employers in the steel industry, saying if they don’t improve their salary increase offer, Numsa will prolong the industrial action and possibly collapse the steel industry.  

The industry cannot afford an indefinite strike because it is battling to survive an environment in which steel prices are depressed because of cheap steel imports. Steel demand is also in the doldrums as big construction and infrastructure projects have dried up since the 2010 Soccer World Cup. 

Numsa and steel employer bodies have to conclude a three-year salary increase deal after a previous multi-year agreement came to an end in 2020.  Seifsa believes that its improved salary increase offer will translate to more money in the pockets of workers. 

Seifsa’s operations director, Lucio Trentini, said the improved offer means that a general labourer’s total guaranteed pay will move to a minimum of R 12,734 per month from R12,500.  On an hourly basis, Trentini said Rate A workers (including artisans) will receive a pay increase in years one, two, and three of R4,24, R4,45, R4,67 respectively. Meanwhile, the hourly pay of Rate H workers (including general labourers) will increase by R 2,97, R3,15, and R3,34 over a three-year period. 

“Given the current economic and trading conditions and economic data tracking the performance of the sector over the last 24 months, we believe the improved offer is more than fair, equitable, and sustainable,” said Trentini.  He struck a reconciliatory tone as Seifsa is prepared to restart talks with Numsa to resolve the salary increase impasse. 

“The longer the posturing and refusal to close [a salary agreement] continues, the more jobs will eventually be lost, in an industry which should be doing everything possible to protect each and every job in the sector.” DM/BM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 5

  • Jim will ” collapse the steel Industry”
    Then this idiot will have no members to hoodwink
    They go back for 1.5% more than originally offered . they probably could have got 5% at the negotiating table with out a strike and loss of wages
    Do the maths, it take years to recover and for 2-3 weeks have no money at all

  • Enough is never enough for Unions…such an outdated model in this day and age in SA where there is rampant unemployment, a pandemic, political upheavals and a dwindling tax base. No one and no company should have to capitulate to threats, blackmail and intimidation. If you do then the loonies take over the asylum and all the guidelines that keep society safe, decent and civilized go out the door and anarchy prevails. The waste!

  • Great perspective Jim !!
    Our steel industry was battling before Covid, is not competitive and now you want to make it even more uncompetitive, strikes and demands. What a smart route to self destruction – but you get a wage anyway Jim, so who cares about the workers really!! You should be ashamed.

    • I’m prepared to bet that Jim earns a very big salary and until the unions have to pay the wages of workers that they take out on strike this irresponsible behaviour will persist.

  • The unions are killing industries and seem happy to be doing so. Short term gains for long term losses. Too bad none of the leadership have the ability to look beyond what they can get in their pockets today.