South Africa

GROUNDUP

Taps run dry in parts of Joburg with water supply under severe strain

Taps run dry in parts of Joburg with water supply under severe strain
South Hills, Linmeyer, Risana, Tulisa Park, parts of Oakdene and parts of Rosettenville Extension in Johannesburg have been gripped by water shortages and interrupted supplies. (Photo: Julia Evans)

Demand often exceeds supply as infrastructure crumbles.

First published by GroundUp.

“We did not have water for nine days in July. Now it’s happened for the second time within a month,” said Tilly Meyer from the Glenzicht Retirement Village in Oakdene, Johannesburg.

Oakdene is one of six areas (South Hills, Linmeyer, Risana, Tulisa Park, parts of Oakdene and parts of Rosettenville Extension) receiving water from the South Hills tower, which were hit by water supply interruptions last week.

A staff member from South Hills clinic said a week without water had a severe impact on the clinic. “Our facility must be cleaned at least three times a day but when there was no water, we could only clean it twice a day, at most. We could not flush our toilets or wash hands with soap and water as often as we’re used to. It was inhumane for our staff to be working under such conditions,” he said.

The clinic relied on a water truck that parked outside the clinic daily for use by the community.

“Last week, officials came to inspect the yard to see where a water tank could be installed. We are hopeful that a tank will be installed soon as it will help, especially when the water supply is interrupted,” he said.

“The City of Johannesburg has experienced unprecedented water supply challenges in some parts of the City in the past few months,” said Mayco Member for Environment and Infrastructure Mpho Moerane in a statement released on Wednesday.

A South Hills resident said it was only after some residents protested at the South Hills tower, on the fifth day of no water, that an explanation was given.

According to Johannesburg Water spokesperson Eleanor Mavimbela, the water supply to the South Hills tower was interrupted because Rand Water, the bulk water supplier in Gauteng, had a power supply issue at their Zuikerbosch purification works on 26 August. This affected their Palmiet pump station that feeds the Meyers Hill reservoir.

“Water levels in the Meyers Hill reservoir were below the threshold at which we could pump water into the South Hills tower. This meant that areas receiving water from the tower were without supply since 26 August,” said Mavimbela.

Water was restored on the evening of 1 September after Rand Water “boosted the Meyers Hill reservoir,” she said.

“When the water supply was restored last week, we had a few geysers burst in the village because of the pressure,” said Tilly Meyer.

But the restored water supply came as a relief for the 250 elderly residents at Glenzicht.

“It becomes very difficult because you can’t expect elderly people to walk a couple of blocks to a water tanker and then carry the buckets home,” said Meyer.

Ageing infrastructure and Rand Water reducing water supply to Gauteng have also affected the water supply for other areas in Johannesburg. Rand Water said it was “under severe pressure whereby the water demand consistently exceeds the water supply”.

It said restrictions were implemented to allow for the recovery of its network systems. Residents can expect an intermittent water supply.

The City is currently under mild (level one) water restrictions.

In its 2021/22 business plan, Johannesburg Water said the replacement cost for infrastructure as at 30 June 2020 was R88-billion, with an infrastructure renewal backlog of R20.4-billion.

Klipfontein View in Midrand was also without water at the end of August, for almost two weeks.

“At first, we were told that we don’t have water because of the Rand Water restrictions. But after a few days, we were told that valves had broken down, which interrupted water supply to Klipfontein View,” said Ward 32 Councillor Bongani Nkomo (DA).

Nkomo said water had been restored to 80% of Klipfontein View on Tuesday night, while the remaining 20% of the area is still without water.

“The remaining 20% form part of the high-lying areas and will be supplied with water tankers until supply has been restored,” he said.

Ward 57 Councillor Faeeza Chame (DA) said four suburbs in her ward ー South Hills, Linmeyer, Risina and Tulisa Park ー were affected.

“This water crisis is a human rights violation. People have the right to basic water supply and basic sanitation, according to the Water Services Act. But for a week, this right was violated because there was no water,” she said.

“Johannesburg Water sent water tankers but my ward is quite big and we only had five tankers servicing areas without water. Within an hour of being full, the tanks were empty again,” she said.

Some DA ward councillors opened a case against Moerane on 4 September at the Moffatview Police Station for the contravention of water supply.

Moerane said in a statement it was “a spectacle” and “inopportune” that the DA opened the case, because the water challenges “were beyond the control of Johannesburg Water”. DM

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Ritchie Morris says:

    Carrying capacity is exceeded – simple as that. Too many people moving into the city at a rate greater than the infrastructure is being upgraded, expanded and maintained. Take the 500,000 foreigners (or how many there are in JHB) out of the equation and the carrying capacity demands may be eased – including housing, jobs, water, electricity, medical, etc. Yes – it sounds harsh, however charity begins at home to South Africans and once their needs are met to a certain extent we can look to assist the rest of the African continent. As one cannot/should’nt put all your eggs in one basket, one cannot put too many people in one city. South Africa is a dry country, it has a defined carrying capacity, especially where water is concerned.

  • virginia crawford says:

    Challenges? Issues? This obfuscating language! Use: problems, incompetence, failure to plan, failure to maintain, failure to act, appointing unskilled people, lack of accountability/ irresponsibility. Clear language will reveal the solutions. Fire people!

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

X

This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.


Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Feeling powerless in politics?

Equip yourself with the tools you need for an informed decision this election. Get the Elections Toolbox with shareable party manifesto guide.