Global treaty on Covid-19 has to be located in human rights, panel told
A global treaty on pandemic preparedness can only take hold if supported by people on the ground, and if the world health agencies are capacitated, say health experts.
Stellenbosch University’s Department of Global Health gathered health experts and activists to discuss the issue of a treaty on pandemic preparedness to deal with the impact of Covid-19 and ensure equitable access to vaccines for all.
On the panel to discuss this were Omane Boame, representing former Ghanaian president John Dramani Mahama; Preeti Sudan, a member of the Independent Panel for Preparedness and Response (IPRR); Professor Lawrence Gostin, founder of the O’Neill Chair in Global Health Law at Georgetown University; Maverick Citizen editor Mark Heywood; Precious Matsoso, former director-general of the Department of Health and an IPPR member; and Zane Dangor, special adviser to the minister of international relations and cooperation.
Boame said former president Mahama supported the need for a pandemic treaty as this would help deal with future pandemics so that countries were not caught “flat-footed”, as has been the case with the Covid-19 response. He said the human life and job losses from the pandemic were the worst human tragedies since the world wars.
Boame said Mahama called on researchers to use the appropriate tools to enable governments, the private sector and civil society to predict with accuracy what the likely impact of future pandemics would be.
Mahama said global communities had to act decisively to save humans, animals and our planet as these were all interconnected, and if Covid-19 continued to run rampant, “we must act as a consortium” to fight it.
Matsoso paid tribute to all the health workers at the forefront of the pandemic. She said Covid-19 had “spread widely and relentlessly across the world. It has affected everyone everywhere. It has wreaked havoc, claimed lives, left us poorer, robbed communities of their livelihoods… in a fragile and unequal world that is environmentally at risk. It has exposed inequities and vulnerabilities. It is still with us.”
Matsoso said the world had been warned about the threat of a pandemic, but was “tardy” in its response, despite the lessons from HIV/Aids
She said that at the 73rd World Health Assembly meeting there had been a call for the evaluation of Covid-19 to find out what happened and how to stop similar pandemics in the future. Among the findings of the International Health Regulations (IHR) committee were that;
- Many countries didn’t have public health capacities in place to protect their own populations and give timely warnings, and where they were aware, they ignored the warnings.
- The World Health Organization (WHO) and international partners also lack capacities, particularly in terms of resources, including financing.
- There is no mechanism for monitoring the implementation of key provisions of the IHR committee, including those that cover human rights.
- Countries only applied the regulations in part, were not sufficiently aware of them, or deliberately ignored them.
- The current IHR provisions make no mention, for instance, of the importance of sharing pathogen samples and genetic sequences, digitalisation, the impact of social media on the alert system or the uptake of recommendations.
The meeting of the World Health Assembly should not just be about talking, but actions should follow, said Matsoto. “Let this be the last time that we have such a catastrophe.”
Sudan said the fact that there was no system of data sharing between world health agencies had resulted in valuable time being lost in responding to the virus. There was also no global leadership, coordination or adequate financing, so people didn’t know how to react, said Sudan.
The IPPR called for immediate action to end the pandemic and a plan to ensure future outbreaks didn’t become pandemics. Its policy recommendations were to: strengthen the WHO through funding, create effective national coordination, build resilient systems, establish pre-negotiation platforms, establish a new global surveillance system, elevate leadership in global health, invest in preparedness now, create new international financing for public goods and create effective national coordination.
Participants said the pandemic could only be tackled through a multisectoral approach, and that global and regional equity were a prerequisite to accessing information for decision-making and data-sharing, for the supply of essential short- and long-term needs, human resource development and the sharing of IPPRs, creating sustainable supply chains.
Gostin said the WHO lacked the power to monitor and remediate harmful actions and needed more independent sources of funding. He said there was insufficient transparency of data and research on global public goods such as diagnostics and vaccines. Gostin revealed that two thirds of countries did not have the capacity to detect and respond to outbreaks.
Discussing the options available to the international community, Gostin said that the UN had extensive power to negotiate large-scale treaties, giving the examples of the climate change treaty and the rights of people with disabilities treaty. He emphasised the need to have one health system to be responsive to and prepared for pandemics.
Heywood told the webinar there were three conditions for the success of a pandemic treaty:
- The realities at play in 2021;
- Learning the lessons of past treaties, particularly the failures and omissions; and
- The need to build from below in partnership with activists and civil society to ensure broad popular understanding of why a treaty is necessary for global health security.
Heywood warned, however, that a treaty was not a “panacea”.
He said a treaty was about solidarity among nations to build power over big pharmaceutical companies. South Africa had lost close to 2,000 healthcare workers in 18 months and a treaty would help to rebuild a weakened health system.
Heywood was emphatic that a treaty had to be located in human rights to send a signal that health was a human right. He said most international treaties and covenants were poorly implemented and monitored.
“Treaties are often aloof to the people who need them the most,” said Heywood, asserting that a treaty on pandemic preparedness would not be successful unless civil society mobilised behind it, drawing from South Africa’s HIV strides, which, Heywood said, came about not because of government, but people on the ground.
Closing the discussion, Dangor reflected on the fact that the voices that had emerged in support of a treaty were from the European Union, G7, big philanthropy institutions and international associations of pharmaceutical manufacturers, who saw themselves as stakeholders and engaged in shifting the direction of global health.
He said he was in support of “many of the ideals” that came out of the IPPR report and that any reform had to reduce the disproportional influence of the private sector on health systems, adding that the Department of International Relations and Cooperation wanted to engage with civil society to achieve a reformed health system.
Dangor said we had to ensure that the WHO was properly resourced by member state contributions to limit private sources of funding. DM/MC
"Information pertaining to Covid-19, vaccines, how to control the spread of the virus and potential treatments is ever-changing. Under the South African Disaster Management Act Regulation 11(5)(c) it is prohibited to publish information through any medium with the intention to deceive people on government measures to address COVID-19. We are therefore disabling the comment section on this article in order to protect both the commenting member and ourselves from potential liability. Should you have additional information that you think we should know, please email [email protected]"