South Africa


Gender activists ask Acting Speaker to intervene over ‘extreme dysfunction’ at Commission on Gender Equality

Gender activists ask Acting Speaker to intervene over ‘extreme dysfunction’  at Commission on Gender Equality
Acting Speaker of the National Assembly Lechesa Tsenoli. (Photo: Gallo Images / Foto24 / Nasief Manie)

A collection of leading South African gender institutions, activists, professionals and individuals have written to Acting Speaker of the National Assembly, Lechesa Tsenoli, requesting a ‘formal intervention’ in the ‘extreme dysfunction’ of the Commission on Gender Equality.

Fifteen institutions and 32 individuals are signatories to the letter dated 16 August seeking to address issues that they allege have impeded the commission “from fulfilling its constitutional and public service mandates”. 

“In particular we are deeply concerned about the Parliament Portfolio Committee’s (PPC’s) apparent interference in the operations of the CGE  (Commission on Gender Equality), and the PPC’s recent partisan media statements on the CGE,” noted Lebogang Ramafoko and advocate Brenda Madumise-Pajibo on behalf of the signatories.

They challenged the Commission on Gender Equality “with its not-insubstantial government budget” to “show evidence of whether and how it has affected systemic change in over twenty years of existence”.

The institutions and activists said the recommendations and findings of six reviews had not been implemented by Parliament. 

These included the “Kader Asmal Report” or findings of a 2007 Parliamentary Ad Hoc Committee on the Review of Chapter 9 and Associated Institutions as well as the Civil Society Advocacy Programme Report, the Office of the Public Protector Findings and Recommendations and the Report of the Human Rights Institute of South Africa. 

“We urgently call upon you to appoint a non-partisan inquiry that is independent of the publicly partisan PPC on Women, Youth and People living with Disabilities, to investigate the CGE’s blatant failure of its constitutional and public mandate which is being fuelled by partisan media statements from both the PPC and the Department of Women, Youth and People living with Disabilities.”

The Commission on Gender Equality, the letter noted, was an independent constitutional entity that had to be held accountable for its constitutional mandates via the PPC as public representatives. 

“Yet the biased conduct of the PPC through its recent media releases and other media coverage, impedes the PPC from effective oversight over the CGE. As the CGE struggles to implement its public mandates.”

The persistence of patriarchal gender inequality and gender-based violence on all levels of society and in all communities, especially in the most marginalised communities suffering of persistent poverty and unemployment, rendered the Commission on Gender Equality’s mandate “all the more critical to us as a country, as women, men, people, children, all subject to banal patriarchal violences”.

“We are compelled to ask the structural question of what the CGE’s impact has been since inception well over two decades ago, what has it achieved in all these many years? Given the extent of GBV in South Africa, what evidence exists that the CGE has effectively combated GBV and reduced the incidence of GBV in the country?”

Civil society, including in impoverished communities, had long used their own resources to combat GBV, “and we have tangible evidence of the impacts of our work on GBV and gender inequality”.

The signatories said each new set of “politically appointed commissioners, leadership with its own priorities and vested interests, ensure the continued ineffectiveness of this important constitutional institution”.

Several of these commissioners, they added, had been tainted by allegations of corruption and malpractice while “some of them have attempted to interfere with the operations of the institution in direct contravention of their oversight mandate, which further leads to a lack of public confidence in the CGE”.

The signatories implored Tsenoli , who is deputy Speaker, to appoint “an impartial investigation into the CGE’s current challenges, as well as its structural historic challenges, which have impeded it from fulfilling its constitutional duty to the nation”.

This inquiry, they added, should consult widely “with not only the CGE, Parliament and government, but more importantly with civil society institutions and individuals active in the field of gender justice”.

They asked Tsenoli to “remind parliament portfolio committees of their mandates and when they are transgressing their mandates with media releases and other actions that do not serve the public interest”. DM

Apart from Ramafoko and Madumise-Pajibo the other signatories are:


Enza Social Research
Greater Rape Intervention Program (GRIP)
Initiative for Strategic Litigation in Africa (ISLA)
KZN Network on Violence Against Women
Litshani vhana-vha-de Foundation
MOSAIC Training, Service and Healing Centre
Practical Solutions
Rainbow Circle Organisation
Sonke Gender Justice
Tears Foundation
Teddy Bear Foundation
Toise White Door Centre of Hope
Vhutshilo Mountain School and Outreach Programme Wise4Afrika
Womxn and Democracy Initiative at the Dullah Omar Institute


Dawn Cavanagh, Flora Centane, Annette Coetzee, Cookie Edwards,  Phathiswa Fowl, Mara Glennie, Nombuso Holliday, Christi Jackson Tracy Jean-Pierre, Trudi Jones, Barbara Kenyon, Rev Bafana Khumalo, Zandile Khumalo, Sacha Knox, Kayan Leung, Zimbine Madikiza, Thabisa Maho, Lauren Malgas, Bridgette Mamugudubi, Adv Tarisai Mchuchu-MacMillan, Tembeka Mhlana, Nomfundo Mokoena, Sindi Msimango. Phumi Mtetwa, Sibongile Ndashe, Unathi Ndiki, Nomshado Ndlovu, Asanda Ndzele, Khathu Nemafhoni, Fiona Nicholson, Vivienne Nkosi, Shaheda Omar Zia Regina Peter, Caroline Peters, Lebogang Ramafoko, Kerryn Rehse, Charlene Roberson, Fatima Shabodien, Zanele Sigudla, Peggy Strachan, Dr Vicci Tallis, Samantha Waterhouse.


Comments - Please in order to comment.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Become a Maverick Insider

This could have been a paywall

On another site this would have been a paywall. Maverick Insider keeps our content free for all.

Become an Insider