Sport

NO REST FOR THE WICKET

The national team was a ‘lonely place’, testifies Ex-Proteas batter Ashwell Prince

Ashwell Prince during a Cape Town Blitz event at Newlands on 5 December 2019. Prince is among the Proteas players who have shared stories of how they allegedly faced racial discrimination from teammates or coaches during their playing days. (Photo: Ashley Vlotman/Gallo Images)

At the Social Justice and Nation Building hearings, another former Proteas player has testified about alleged incidents of racial discrimination during his playing days.

Former Proteas batter Ashwell Prince is the latest black cricketer to testify at the Social Justice and Nation Building (SJN) hearings and make revelations of a disunited Proteas team during his time.

The inquiry, facilitated by Cricket South Africa (CSA) to investigate racial discrimination in local cricket, has also seen the likes of Aaron Phangiso, Paul Adams, Thami Tsolekile and Roger Telemachus testify under oath about their experiences in South African cricket.

Speaking at the beginning of the fifth week of the hearings, which are chaired by veteran advocate Dumisa Ntsebeza, Prince recalled how segregated the team environment was during his playing days. This was despite the team enjoying one of its most successful and fruitful periods since the end of apartheid.

“[The national team] was a lonely place. A person knows when a person is welcome and you know when you are not welcome,” said Prince on Monday. “You think you’re playing for your country, that you’re living a dream, but it was no dream.”

The left-handed batter played 66 Tests and 49 one-day internationals (ODIs) for the Proteas.

The 50-overs appearances included the 2007 World Cup, where the Proteas bombed out in the semifinals, trounced by bitter rivals Australia.

The team had in their arsenal some of the best cricketers of their generation, including Jacques Kallis, Graeme Smith and Makhaya Ntini. They also went into the tournament ranked No 1 in the world.

Prince said the fallout from the disappointment of the team failing to live up to their potential saw fingers of blame pointed at the black players by way of criticising the quota system.    

He, alongside Ntini and Herschelle Gibbs, had been vocal about the criticism, which they felt had racial undertones.

“We said: ‘If you think the team lost because of quotas, then scrap the quota system.’ We were firm believers that we were good enough to be in the team, we believed we were better than some white players. If anyone didn’t think so, we wanted them to tell us to our face,” said Prince.

Details of this meeting were later leaked to a national newspaper. Prince said he believed their words were twisted to put them in a bad light in the public eye.

“It was an attempt to push a narrative in the media that suits white people. And then wanting to drive that narrative by using black players in the team – that it is Ntini, Gibbs and Prince that are saying these things.

“I didn’t care if I played another game for the country or not. For me, that was not a team, because that was the kind of environment we played in – we were never one, never.

“We believed we deserved to be in that team, we were prepared to go toe to toe with any player of any colour to prove our worth to play for the national team.”

Adams’s testimony

Prince’s testimony follows that of former Proteas left-arm unorthodox spin bowler Paul Adams, who told the inquiry two weeks ago that some white teammates used to call him “brown shit” while on international duty.

“I was called ‘brown shit’, and it often happened in fines meetings after we won a game, and there was a song that was sung: ‘Brown shit in the ring, tra-la-la-la.’ When you are playing for your country, you’re in that [moment of] victory, you don’t make sense of it, you just go along with it, brush it off, but it’s actually blatant racism,” he said.

Proteas coach Mark Boucher, whom Adams alleged was one of the guilty parties in the aforementioned incidents, has since responded by saying he will cooperate with the SJN.   

“I have been asked by the SJN to submit a written reply to the various allegations made during the hearings that have taken place,” Boucher said in a statement on Friday.

“The documents that I have been furnished with, as well as the various reports in the media, require my full attention and consideration, which I will be giving to them over the course of the next week.

“My intentions are to cooperate fully with all requests made by the ombudsman, so that the objectives of the SJN can be achieved.

“The allegations in the media currently are hurtful, factually incorrect and do not serve the greater good of our country or the intentions of the SJN in mending past hurts and building relations. I will not be commenting any further until the process with the SJN has been completed.”

CSA expects Ntsebeza to hand over a report of his findings and recommendations at the end of September 2021, after which they will decide on a way forward. DM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 3

  • Not surprising that a racially based Quota system created issues for all concerned.
    When will social engineering politicians learn?
    Provide all schools with the facilities and training and let the best people on merit represent our country.

  • The examples cited are disgusting and offensive – not only to blacks but to all South Africans, unless they are in a time warp. However, if the statements are true, surely the time to raise the issue was when they happened. At the time all pdi players were “Royal Game” and could never have lost their places in the sides. Also the SA Cricket Board was dominated by people of colour who would not have tolerated the kind of behaviour described. It seems strange that this is at the forefront now.

    • I have to agree…………seems odd to me though I do note some (not all as some are very distinguished e.g. Gibbs, Prince) have been subject of various sanctions and criminality and so question of credibility of motives?