This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

We made a promise to you that we’ll never erect a paywall and we intend to keep that promise. We also want to continually improve your reading experience and you can help us do that by registering with us. It’s quick, easy and will cost you nothing.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish up registering with us:

Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

Pick n Pay CEO and alcohol sector urge President Ramaph...

Business Maverick


Pick n Pay CEO and alcohol sector urge President Ramaphosa to end the booze ban

DURBANVILLE, SOUTH AFRICA - DECEMBER 03: A general view of liquor for sale on December 03, 2020 in Durbanville, South Africa. It is reported the National Coronavirus Command Council (NCCC) has recommended the restriction of alcohol sales amid fears of a second COVID-19 surge . (Photo by Gallo Images/Jacques Stander)

‘Lifting the ban will be widely welcomed across the country as a positive and responsible step forward in our recovery from the events of last week.’

Pieter Boone, the CEO of grocery chain Pick n Pay, called on President Cyril Ramaphosa to end the booze ban, noting that “many independent shopkeepers… will not survive another prolonged ban”. Lifting prohibition will also presumably help Pick n Pay’s bottom line. Boone’s comments were echoed by the wider alcohol industry, which said the loss to SA’s GDP before the looting was almost R65-billion and counting.

Boone made the comments in a statement on Thursday after visiting stores in Gauteng and KZN that were damaged by the looting unleashed after the jailing of former president Jacob Zuma.

Pick n Pay CEO Pieter Boone. (Photo: Flickr / Confederation of Indian Industry)

“Speaking to franchisees and independent traders in the affected areas, I firmly believe that it is time now for the president to announce a lifting of the ban on liquor sales,” Boone said in the statement.

“We have hopefully passed the peak of the Covid-19 third wave. In normal times, many independent shopkeepers depend on responsible liquor sales to sustain their businesses, and will not survive another prolonged ban. The social unrest, looting, and damage has dealt them a further body blow – as well as releasing a large amount of looted liquor into the illicit market. 

“Lifting the ban will be widely welcomed across the country as a positive and responsible step forward in our recovery from the events of last week.”

Boone said that Pick n Pay was anticipating the lifting of the ban, and that by the end of next week the company will have repaired and be ready to reopen 28 of its 76 severely damaged liquor stores in KZN and Gauteng. In addition, 136 food, grocery, clothing and building stores belonging to Pick n Pay were looted and/or burnt.

The alcohol bans have been taking a mounting toll on the economy and jobs, and the looting of liquor stores points to bottled up frustration on the streets. Plenty of social and health problems are attributed to alcohol consumption in South Africa, but prohibition is a blunt instrument that does not treat adults like grown-ups – fitting for a paternalistic policy that has racist and classist roots.

The wider alcohol sector on Thursday also called for an end to the ban.

The South African Liquor Brand Owners’ Association, Beer Association of South Africa, Vinpro, National Liquor Traders, Liquor Traders’ Association of South Africa, and the Consumer Goods Association of South Africa called, in a joint statement, “for an opening up of the liquor trade as of 26 July”.

“Industry estimates losses to GDP of R64.8-billion due to the four alcohol bans, excluding the cost of last week’s looting,” the statement said. That’s about 1.3% of GDP.

“This as the industry counts the cost of four successive bans in response to the coronavirus pandemic and the devastation wrought by last week’s looting in KwaZulu-Natal and Gauteng that left more than 200 alcohol retailers and outlets plundered, damaged and burnt. Over R500-million of looted liquor stock is now in the public domain and is being sold in the illicit market,” it said.

And unlike the dyed cash from looted ATMs, this flow of illicit grog will have currency.

The statement said the industry estimated the tax revenue losses from the ban at R34.2-billion and lost excise revenue at R10.2 billion – at a time when Finance Minister Tito Mboweni needs every rand he can lay his hands on. It also questioned the policy’s impact on reducing trauma admissions in hospitals.

This is the subject of considerable debate, but the fact is that state failure, including the outright looting of state coffers, has also crippled the health sector’s ability to deal with a once-in-a-century pandemic. Prohibition is a Band-Aid “solution” to wider failures of ANC governance.

“The continued ban on the sale of alcohol exacerbates the precarious economic position of thousands of businesses – many of them small and black-owned – with no scientific basis for containing the spread of the coronavirus,” National Liquor Traders Council spokesperson Lucky Ntimane was quoted as saying.

There has also been carnage in the labour-intensive restaurant industry, which relies heavily on alcohol sales to boost margins which are often wafer thin.

Such pleas in the past have fallen on deaf ears, and the bans also have public support among women who know first-hand the horrors of gender-based violence, as well as socially-conservative, faith-based institutions, whose flocks are not politically insignificant.

Still, prohibition gives rise to illicit commerce – witness the roaring dagga trade of previous years – and it is blunting legitimate economic activity, throttling badly-needed investment while killing jobs against the backdrop of sky-high unemployment. 

The policy’s job-killing consequences may be the one spark that can sway the mandarins in Pretoria. Meanwhile, many responsible adults could probably do with a dop as this winter of discontent rumbles on. DM/BM 


Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 8

  • So the loss is R64 billion. I can understand losing revenue from exports. Minus exports, the money is still here, right. Or am I wrong? A large part of that R64 billion should be spent of food and luxuries here in the country. Some families with alcoholics must be getting food to eat and the local store which are lucky not to be damaged by the unrest are seeing new customers. I remember a somebody once telling me that when Lotto started, Coca Cola felt the pinch because the luxury became the Lotto ticket. The money not lost, it was still here in somebody else’s pocket, not funding Armani suits for the shareholders and directors.

    Then there are job losses versus freeing up space in hospitals to save lives. Hospitals where we the taxpayers fund to treat 70% of trauma where alcohol and drugs are central to causing the problem. So some of those jobs will come back when the market opens and the lives which are lost through no beds available because of alcohol induced violence…….…. There must be no argument about the overload in the trauma department through alcohol induced injury – my daughter is a doctor in a government hospital. Go spin the stats somewhere else.

    Cocaine, nayope, heroine, opium, madrax …. are equally addictive as cigarettes and alcohol, but cigarettes and alcohol are legal except in some Islamic states. CR – dammed if you do, dammed if you don’t.

    • .. the money is still here right?
      So are the people many now without jobs and more to lose theirs. Manufacturing and exports adversely, steadily weaking Rand, increased flight of foreign investors’ capital, increasing emigration of HNW individuals and their capital , imports at higher Rand cost and lost tax revenues to be replaced somehow so one needs to look at little wider I would suggest.
      Sure it’s not all alcohol ban related but it certainly contributes in many respects.

      • Point taken and in the case of PnP it is more about bottom line than anything else. They don’t sell booze, the small guys get the turnover. It is too lucrative to give it away. What next, tyres exhaust and shock absorbers at your local PnP – Hyper.

  • Mr Booze, with the extra money P&P will add to its ROI ensure that you appoint trained security guards instead of giving a trolley collector a t-shirt with the wording ‘security’ printed on the back. They may then be able to better protect your stores instead of leaving this task to the community members who also had to do this in addition to protecting the lives of their families during the past week. Many more stores would have gone up in smoke if CPF members had not also protected your outlets. A word of thanks would also have helped.

    • I completely agree. There is something wrong when a business is only kept viable through the sale of an addictive, destructive substance.

  • Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted