South Africa


Prasa loses application for leave to appeal reinstating executives

Prasa loses application for leave to appeal reinstating executives
The Labour Court has found that three executives have been subjected to “unnecessary litigation” by PRASA in attempts to appeal their dismissal. (Archive photo: Barbara Maregele)

Judge finds grounds for appeal of Ngoye judgment ‘grossly misconceived’.

First published by GroundUp.

On Thursday, Acting Judge Moses Baloyi in the Johannesburg Labour Court dismissed an application for leave to appeal launched by the Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa) against the Court’s 2 March ruling. That ruling reinstated three executives — Martha Ngoye, Tiro Holele and Nkosinathi Khena. It came after Prasa executives were fired under the instruction of Prasa’s board in controversial circumstances in late January and early February.

On 3 March, Prasa Chairperson Leonard Ramatlakane indicated that Prasa would be appealing the March ruling, calling the decision “flawed in law”.

On 8 March Prasa Board member Smanga Sethene repeated this claim in a press conference at Langa station in Cape Town.

Prasa had sought to appeal the March ruling on three grounds. First, Prasa argued that the Labour Court did not have the required jurisdiction to determine the application. For this Prasa offered complex grounds, including that since Ngoye, Holele, and Khena’s case was based on purported unlawfulness by Prasa, their claims could not be adjudicated by the Labour Court.

Acting Judge Baloyi found this reasoning “grossly misconceived”.

Second, Prasa sought to appeal the ruling that the matter was urgent.

This was also summarily dismissed by Acting Judge Baloyi, who found that the court’s finding that the application be heard as an urgent matter was not appealable, as the court “has the inherent power to control its processes” and has discretionary powers.

Third, Prasa sought to appeal the costs order that was imposed by the court against the rail agency in the March ruling.

Here again, Prasa failed to show that the Court was unfair or improper in imposing costs.

Acting Judge Baloyi said Prasa had pursued an appeal “on a mere belief that the Labour Court’s findings cannot be left unchallenged”.

He also said that Ngoye, Holele, and Khena “have been subjected to an unnecessary litigation for leave to appeal that is devoid of reasonable prospects of success”. DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • John Bestwick says:

    Need to look into Ramatlakane a bit deeper. Casts a big dirty shadow.

  • Dhasagan Pillay says:

    The way SA’s state and pseudo-state actors all misread the phrase ‘justice for all’ as ‘justice for ***all’ makes me wish for a law punishing frivolous litigation, not just with cost damages but head shaving and a naked walk of shame, followed by the nun from GoT.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Download the Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox.

+ Your election day questions answered
+ What's different this election
+ Test yourself! Take the quiz