Business Maverick


It’s the undertow: Why financial markets ignored Ace Magashule’s ‘suspension’ of the ANC president

It’s the undertow: Why financial markets ignored Ace Magashule’s ‘suspension’ of the ANC president
Suspended ANC Secretary-General Ace Magashule. (Photo: Gallo Images / Sharon Seretlo)

The news on Wednesday was dominated by the decision of the recently suspended ANC Secretary-General Ace Magushule to suspend his own party’s president, Cyril Ramaphosa. But did you notice what didn’t happen? Those ever-fickle markets… they really didn’t notice.

On Wednesday, 6 May 2021, not much happened on the markets. The JSE All Share rose, but not by very much. The currency markets were quite active, with the rand strengthening against all major currencies by over 100 basis points, mainly on the back of stronger gold and platinum prices. The biggest gainers on the JSE were gold stocks. 

What a contrast to that fateful night on 9 December 2015, when then president Jacob Zuma decided to sack his finance minister Nhlanhla Nene, also late on a Wednesday night. Within two days, SA’s banks had lost 25% of their value and the property sector was decimated. 

Bond yields rose (or, to put it another way, got smacked) from 9.54% to 11.46% over two days. On Thursday, SA’s most watched bond, the R186, strengthened by falling half a point (bonds are weird).

So what is the difference between a finance minister being sacked and a president being put on suspension? Why did the markets react so badly in one case and not the other?

The answer may be that, below the superficial flows in financial markets, there is often a strong undertow that is not apparent until it’s triggered by some event. And the important thing is the directional flow of the undertow. If an event takes place which confirms the undertow, the market instantly overreacts. But if an event takes place which contradicts the undertow, the market is more passive.

In the Nene case, and other sackings that followed, including Pravin Gordhan’s turn at the guillotine in 2017, SA’s economic performance had been sub-par for years. It wasn’t the worst in the world, but economic growth from 2010 to 2020 came in below the inflation rate, which meant the country was going backwards. But slowly. 

Yet, over the past year, the economic decline has been calamitous. So why then did a big political event like the president being suspended not move the needle?

Vestact fund manager Paul Theron says the market probably read Magushule’s act as the last desperate move of a spent force. SA’s investment community is a battle-hardened bunch, and evidence of factionalism with the ANC is hardly anything new. 

In some ways, the battle can be read as supporting good governance, since it seems clear that Ramaphosa is gradually winning this factional fight, and corrupt officials are at last losing their status in the party. Yet if this were really the case, it’s possible SA’s banks would probably have got a boost, and they did not, Theron says.

More likely, it has to do with the undertow. Even though SA is in a tough economic position and has lost economic ground more quickly and dramatically under Ramaphosa than under Zuma, the undertow is flowing forward – things do seem to be improving.

There is a strong commodity price boom taking place, and the gradually expanding Covid-19 vaccine programmes around the world are helping to normalise countries around the world. 

The rand is trading against the dollar at almost exactly the same rate it was when Nenegate took place. The only difference is that prior to Nenegate, it had been falling. But for the past year, the rand has been strengthening. BM/DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Madelein Jansen says:

    Am I the only one confused? Ace’s letter to President Ramaphosa is null & void, as he does not have the power to suspend the President without the necessary procedures. This article legitimizes wishy washy tit-for-tat childish behavior. Markets didn’t drop because the President is NOT suspended?

  • Desmond McLeod says:

    Rand has been relatively stable for some time now – perhaps since curtailment of Gupta activities? I.e. did the huge falls in currency value coincide with Zupta Gang moving billions offshore?

    • Desmond McLeod says:

      It could have been a huge “money printing” system – move billions out – collapse the Rand – sell the forex and bring back the billions plus the forex profit. Keep the cycle going every 6 or so months and make huge gains in Rand terms!! Meanwhile fleecing the South African economy!!

    • Geoff Young says:

      Rand strength has little to do with the Gupta exit or politics and more to do with the pandemic-driven commodity boom (great for the economy) and the consistently attractive interest rate difference between SA and developed world currencies which is not so great.

    • Geoff Young says:

      This is fickle support that will disappear the moment the interest rate spread narrows.

  • Jeannine Ibbotson Ibbotson says:

    agree 100% with Madelein’s comments. The President is not suspended, full stop. Therefore no market reaction.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted


This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.

Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.