South Africa


Impeachment sword won’t prevent Judge Hlophe from playing a major role in JSC Western Cape interviews

Impeachment sword won’t prevent Judge Hlophe from playing a major role in JSC Western Cape interviews
Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe. (Photo: Gallo Images / Foto24 / Nelius Rademan)

The Judge President of a division who appears to be a source of, and/or object of, so much fear, loathing and outright hostility among fellow judges will get to quiz those seeking a position on his Bench.

The Judicial Service Commission (JSC) has let it be known that Western Cape Judge President John Hlophe will be present at the interviews on Friday, 23 April of candidates for two vacant positions in his own fraught division.

Hlophe’s intention to appear at the interviews and the JSC’s communication on 19 April that the Judge President will be doing so, occur in a sort of legal vacuum, a place in which Hlophe thrives. 

It took more than 13 years for a complaint about Hlophe’s inappropriate approach to two Constitutional Court judges in 2008 to be heard by a Judicial Conduct Tribunal, chaired by retired Judge Joop Labuschagne, which unanimously found Hlophe guilty of gross misconduct.

Hlophe later issued a statement through his lawyer Barnabas Xulu that the Judge President “fundamentally disagreed with the factual and legal findings” of the tribunal and has taken these on appeal.

Calls by the Cape Bar Council, Western Cape Premier Alan Winde and Freedom Under Law (FUL) to delay the interviewing of judges in Hlophe’s division until the JSC has made up its mind whether it agrees with the tribunal’s finding that Hlophe is guilty of gross misconduct, have gone unheeded.

In 2016, when FUL queried Hlophe’s participation in interviews for the Bench and considering pending matters with the JSC, commission secretary Sello Chiloane responded that there was nothing stopping Hlophe from participating.

Back then, Chiloane said Hlophe had not been suspended nor had he been found guilty, thus “there is no bar preventing Judge Hlophe [from] carrying out his responsibilities as the Judge President of the Western Cape Division of the High Court”.

But now that the tribunal has delivered a guilty verdict, it seems the JSC finds itself, once again, caught in Hlophe’s headlights, backtracking on its own 2016 statement to FUL.

The Judge President of a division who appears to be a source of, and/or object of, so much fear, loathing and outright hostility among fellow judges will get to quiz those seeking a position on his Bench.

Until someone makes the first move, Hlophe is still the Judge President of the Western Cape and it would be within his character and modus operandi to cock a snook at anyone thinking he would step out of the ring at this late stage.

Between the JSC making a decision and the possible suspension of Hlophe by President Cyril Ramaphosa pending the impeachment process, Hlophe will continue to operate in the vacuum.

Issues that are bound to swirl about the interviews are not only Hlophe’s standing in relation to various complaints against him, but also accusations by his estranged deputy, Patricia Goliath, of repeatedly recommending the same candidates as acting judges wh0 then find permanent placement.

Among the seven candidates who have been put forward for two positions on the Western Cape Bench, the most controversial is perhaps Bryan Hack, a member of the right-wing Conservative Students’ Alliance at UCT in the late 1970s.

Hack, who was 22 at the time, was charged with bombing the home of Colin Eglin, then leader of the PFP opposition. He was charged alongside David Beelders and Arnold van der Westhuizen under the Terrorism Act of the time, but was acquitted.

Hack has publicly admitted he is a friend of the Hlophe family and attended the Judge President’s wedding to Judge Gayaat Salie-Hlophe.

In 2019, as an acting judge in the division, Hack was responsible for a landmark ruling in relation to the National Credit Act and the use of garnishee orders by lenders to settle debts, especially by over-indebted poor borrowers.

Another interesting name on the shortlist is Acting Judge Frederick Sievers, who has served three terms since 2018. Hlophe has described Sievers as “an extremely talented member of the bar” while Goliath has accused Sievers of “micromanaging” her.

It was Sievers who ruled in 2020 that pharmaceutical giant Clicks could not have a beneficial interest in Unicorn Pharmaceuticals, because it contravened the Pharmacy Act. 

The case was noteworthy in that the Department of Health had dismissed the concerns of community pharmacists in the matter.

Only two women made the shortlist, advocates Penelope Magona-Dano and Nobahle Mangcu-Lockwood. In 2021 Mangcu-Lockwood ruled against the Kannaland Municipality barring the council from pushing through a R735-million deal outsourcing water and electricity.

Magona-Dano in 2020 handed down a judgment that the Intestate Succession Act discriminated against unmarried life partners.

Other candidates are Matthew Francis, Selwyn Hockey and Daniel Thulare.

Thulare is the Chief Magistrate of Cape Town. In October 2020, Acting Judge Selwyn Hockey prevented the City of Cape Town from confiscating the belongings of 30 individuals who had set up home on a grass verge near an old age home from which they had been evicted.

With this round of judicial interviews taking place in a highly politicised climate combined with the untenable tensions in the judiciary itself, with Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng at the centre, Hlophe may feel right at home. DM


Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • David A says:

    I wish Daily Maverick would stop using this phrase “Judiciary in crisis”. The judiciary is not in crisis. It is not without its problems, but the majority of its members are exceptionally hard-working, conscientious and brilliant judges, and for the past decade or so have been just about the only thing keeping our country from total collapse.

    • Gerrie Pretorius Pretorius says:

      Really? Why do they not speak up against those who are compromised?

    • Darryl van Blerk says:

      The judiciary may not be in overall crisis but there is definitely a crisis in the judiciary. Among the members of the JSC are the “alleged” thief Julius Malema and the disgraced John Hlope, both living in the twilight world of “due process”. It’s not difficult to imagine what sort of judges they would prefer to have populating the bench. Add to this a seemingly confused Chief Justice, uncertain of his mandate and the potential for great harm is possible. There are certainly people of calibre and integrity among the legal fraternity who must understand the dangers, one hopes they act with more urgency than the glacially paced JSC has thus far.

  • Hermann Funk says:

    This is totally insane.

  • Gerrie Pretorius Pretorius says:

    And while cr takes his time to consider whether hlope should be suspended or not (which could take years …) the ‘judicial crisis’ in, especially the western Cape continues.

  • Gerhard Pretorius says:

    Def for Crisis = a time of intense difficulty or danger. An apt description for a sector that takes 12 years to come to a verdict about serious transgressions of one of its own, only to allow him to continue as normal. As I have predicted before the next step will take another 12 years.

  • Paddy Ross says:

    The purpose of the JSC is to reassure the public that the legal profession is capable of “policing”itself. Currently, it is singularly failing to do so and needs to be open to reform.

    • Tom Lessing says:

      Could not agree more. The doctrine of no one should be a judge in his own cause conveniently ignored. How can a judge, judge a judge?

  • Sergio CPT says:

    This is madness and a national disgrace that such a slimy, deceitful and thoroughly vile and dishonest scumbag like Hlophe is allowed to continue in his position. Crime and being the most obnoxious and crooked individual pays handsomely in SA as witnessed by the odious zuma, magashule etc etc.

  • Tom Lessing says:

    JSC seems to stand for, “Just a Sad Circus”. That they think it is acceptable to waste tax payers money for more than a decade on this is worthy of scorn. The JSC deserves the criticisms for its tardiness and laziness.

  • Chris 123 says:

    Surely the Chief Justice can suspend him??? Disgraceful that he can be allowed to pick judges.

  • Terry Theunissen says:

    Sievers isn’t capable of conducting bus …let alone a trial in a court of law .
    I have sent a strong objection to the JSC with copies of a DRAFT to an order he had ALREADY prepared and initialed in chambers BEFORE hearing anyone … handed out before anyone left the court room. CHECK YOUR E-MAIL

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.7% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.3% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.3% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country.

Be part of that 0.3%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

MavericKids vol 3

How can a child learn to read if they don't have a book?

81% of South African children aged 10 can't read for meaning. You can help by pre-ordering a copy of MavericKids.

For every copy sold we will donate a copy to Gift of The Givers for children in need of reading support.