First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We write for you

It’s a public service and we refuse to erect a paywall and force you to pay for truth. Instead, we ask (nicely and often) that those of you who can afford to, become a Maverick Insider and help with whatever you can. In order for truth not to become a thing of the past, we need to keep going.

Currently, 18,000 (or less than 0.3%) of our brave and generous readers are members; which says a lot about their characters and commitment to our country. These people are paying for a free service in order to keep it free for everyone.

They are the true South AfriCANs.(Sorry, we couldn’t help ourselves.)

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Discredited prosecutor Lawrence Mrwebi booted from list...

South Africa


Discredited prosecutor Lawrence Mrwebi booted from list of candidates for statutory body after intervention by DA MP

Former special director of public prosecutions Lawrence Mrwebi. (Photo: Gallo Images / Phill Magakoe)

Former special director of public prosecutions Lawrence Mrwebi, who was removed from NPA in 2019, has been taken off the parliamentary shortlist to serve on the Critical Infrastructure Council.

Questions may well be asked about how a list of parliamentary nominees to sit on the Critical Infrastructure Council, a statutory body that has oversight over National Key Points, included Lawrence Mrwebi’s name. 

Mrwebi was removed from the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) by President Cyril Ramaphosa in April 2019 on the recommendation of an inquiry into his fitness and probity, chaired by retired Constitutional Court Judge Yvonne Mokgoro. (Read more here. )

In December 2019, Parliament approved Mrwebi’s removal as required by law. (Read more here. )

The Critical Infrastructure Act expressly disqualifies from the council anyone who “has been removed from an office of trust”, according to section 5 of the law.

Perhaps the answer is that it was for lawmakers to make that determination, and not the parliamentary staff processing submissions in response to a public advertisement.

On Tuesday, eagled-eyed DA MP Okkie Terblanche alerted his fellow parliamentarians to Mrwebi’s inclusion through comments about a person “declared unfit for office” by the Mokgoro inquiry.

While no names were mentioned, the reference was clear. Earlier, Daily Maverick snapped the initial list as names flashed past on the screen. Mrwebi was among them.

In April 2019, the Mokgoro inquiry recommended “the president remove Lawrence Sithembiso Mrwebi from office as SDPP [Special Director of Public Prosecutions]”, outlining the failure “to introspect and reflect on the issues which have beset the NPA with their involvement, as reflected in this report” that included Mrwebi dropping charges against then suspended crime intelligence boss Richard Mdluli. Mdluli currently faces fraud and corruption charges while serving a five-year jail term for assault and kidnapping.  (Read more here.)

Mrwebi’s removal from office, along with former Deputy National Director of Public Prosecutions, Nomgcobo Jiba, led to the closure of one State Capture chapter at the NPA.

When Jiba turned to the courts to interdict Parliament from approving her removal, the process was put on ice. However, the Western Cape High Court in October 2019 dismissed Jiba’s application and a month later she told Parliament that she would be dropping all legal challenges. 

That cleared the way for the legislature to approve the president’s decision to remove her from office – and Mrwebi, too. Read here.

Controversy on the ANC’s preferred new deputy public protector, but unanimity on making sure Jiba’s not coming back

On Tuesday, Mrwebi’s name was removed from the parliamentary shortlist to serve on the Critical Infrastructure Council following Terblanche’s intervention. Also removed were four matriculants and those with qualifications that included PR and “certificates in leadership”.

Going by discussions, supported by longer on-screen exposure of qualifications, it seemed the list would include a couple of security experts, at least one MBA holder and academics, in a balance of race, youth and gender. 

Once Parliament’s police committee decides to publish its shortlist ahead of interviews, the final names will be announced.

Terblanche told Daily Maverick he was “reasonably satisfied” with the process so far. “We have to be mindful there’s a vetting process still ahead.”

That Critical Infrastructure Council oversees what apartheid laws once described as National Key Points, locations that required special access conditions and confidentiality. The current Critical Infrastructure Act has extended classifications to include government databases.

This inaugural council – a top secret vetting level is a must for members – is meant to develop “objective criteria” for the identification, declaration and protection of critical infrastructure, ensure public-private cooperation and help secure such critical infrastructure “by creating an environment in which public safety, public confidence and basic public services are promoted”. 

The police, State Security Agency and Department of Defence must deploy members to this council, as does Home Affairs, Public Works, the National Disaster Management Centre and the South African Local Government Association (Salga). The boss of the Civilian Secretariat for Police Services, or the Secretary for Police Services, chairs the council.

The police minister must appoint five members from the 10 nominations which Parliament compiles from a shortlist of at least 20 – that should include those knowledgeable in critical infrastructure protection, including at least one qualified in cybersecurity, risk management, disaster management and basic public services, as the legislation puts it.

Failing to secure top-secret vetting is another disqualification, alongside being declared an unrehabilitated insolvent or having “a direct or indirect financial or personal interest in any critical infrastructure”, according to the Critical Infrastructure Act. Or, as in Mrwebi’s case, having been removed from an office of trust.

What Tuesday’s process again highlighted with the inclusion, albeit briefly, of Mrwebi’s name, is the revolving door nature of important statutory and constitutional offices.

Opposition parties have publicly expressed concern about this revolving door, but also about the qualifications and experience of many of those submitted for consideration to structures where Parliament has a say. Privately, many ANC MPs share similar concerns.

In recent weeks, candidates for parliamentary consideration for the position of human rights commissioner included former home affairs deputy minister Fatima Chohan and ex-ANC MP Jonas Sibanyoni, who’s currently a part-time commissioner.

SAHRC chairperson Bongani Majola was recommended by Parliament and then appointed by the president from January 2017 after having lost out in 2016 for the Public Protector’s post.

Recently, Parliament’s trade and industry committee interviewed – for the position of National Lotteries Commission chairperson – Terry Tselane, who in November 2018 left the Independent Electoral Commission after a seven-year term as vice chairperson, and former presidency director-general Reverend Frank Chikane, who served in the administrations of Thabo Mbeki and Kgalema Motlanthe.

These are just a few instances. Perhaps sometimes it’s sheer bloody-mindedness that a name is put forward, or maybe even a calculated gamble.

Parliament must be on guard. MPs were, during Tuesday’s shortlisting of candidates to interview for the Critical Infrastructure Council that’s touted as the legislative upgrade to bring the National Key Points in line with the Constitution.

Legislators must remain vigilant. DM


Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 10

  • Where is the Good News section in this publication. Currently with Zuma on the ropes, Hope, clutching at straws…. we need a good news section. I am going to have to March for it as is traditional in SA

    • Without the ‘bad news’ we won’t be able to tell the ‘good’ ! The one without the other does not exist. The proportions of the two don’t always match our perceptions. From Desiderata is the statement …”….., no doubt the universe is unfolding as it should.”

      • Philosophically that is true. In reality, we are so used to bad news, we cannot recognise good. Government personnel doing the job that they are paid for is supposed to be good news.

        • No, government officials doing their jobs as agreed is NOT good news – that is setting the bar too low. Going the extra mile and rendering outstanding service would be good news

  • Based on his fantastical performance at the Zondo enquiry a few days ago, I hope people are checking for the paranoid and ‘spooky’ Mlobo ! Maybe that is a qualification for getting in ! Post the Madiba era, we have produced some really whacky characters ! It is the ‘nature of the beast’ I guess ?

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted