South Africa

Newsflash

Veiled threats and discontent as Zuma supporters mobilise outside ConCourt

Pro Zuma supporters hold a flag bearing the face of ex South African President Jacob Zuma as the they show their support outside the Constitutional Court. Photo / Shiraaz Mohamed.

Supporters of former president Jacob Zuma, the face of which is Carl Niehaus, spokesperson for the uMkhonto weSizwe Military Veterans (MKVA) vowed on Thursday that South Africa will experience instability should Zuma lose the case before the Constitutional Court.

Advocate Tembeka Ngcukaitobi, arguing on behalf of the State Capture Commission, called for former president Jacob Zuma to be jailed for two years because his conduct in ignoring a summons and Constitutional Court instruction to appear before the commission threatens South Africa’s entire constitutional order.

But on hearing this, Zuma’s supporters who had gathered outside the court on Thursday said this would bring instability to the country.

Carl Niehaus addresses members of the media outside the Constitutional Court as he showed up in support of former South African President Jacob Zuma. Photo / Shiraaz Mohamed.

“Such a judgement would lead to outrage and anger amongst us supporters,” said Carl Niehaus, spokesperson for the uMkhonto weSizwe Military Veterans (MKVA) and ardent Zuma supporter.

“We do not want to see social instability in SA. But such a judgement will inevitably lead to social instability which will not be good for South Africa or for the ANC, that’s why we sincerely hope that this will not happen,” Niehaus expanded.

“If the judgement does not go in favour of president Zuma it will be a sad day. President Zuma is probably the most prominent politician in the country, he has huge support.

“The supporters of president Zuma feel very strongly that he’s been treated unfairly and that he has been politically targeted,” Niehaus said. 

Asked about his own personal attendance Niehaus said: “I’m here because I’m outraged at the manner in which president Zuma has been treated for many years. I find it unacceptable that he constantly gets targeted for political reasons. I believe the Zondo commission was started to target president Zuma.”

Niehaus said under these circumstances it was correct for Zuma to feel that he was targeted. And that the law was adjusted and used in the attack against him.

Daily Maverick asked Niehaus if, according to the meeting between the MKMVA and Zuma, the former president had shown any intention to respect the rule of law as per his oath of office as former president of the Republic, Niehaus said: “The rule of law is important to us and president Zuma does not want to undermine the rule of law.”

Niehaus said when the MKMVA met with Zuma in Nkandla, Zuma emphasised that he did not want to undermine the rule of law.

But Niehaus said Zuma had raised some very serious concerns about how Judge Zondo, in the recusal application that Zuma had made, presented himself both as a material witness and judge.

A policeman addresses pro-Zuma supporters asking them not to sing as they showed support outside the Constitutional Court. Instruction was given to both anti-Zuma and pro-Zuma supporters for them not to sing on the property. They were allowed to do so outside on the street.
Photo / Shiraaz Mohamed.

According to Niehaus, Zuma’s other concern was that Judge Zondo had rushed past the high court, to the Constitutional Court.

He said Zuma believes that the matter should have headed to the high first.

Niehaus said Zuma had told the MKMVA that the Constitutional Court had taken away his right to remain silent.

He said, as a result, the ConCourt and the Commission had created a situation where Zuma was cornered into the position of contempt of court. Zuma did not file opposing papers to the application by the State Capture Commission.

Zuma’s supporters were not alone outside the court.

Despite the cold and rainy weather, many organisations turned up to support the Constitutional Court. Among them was former DA leader Mmusi Maimane’s One South Africa Movement (OSAM). A representative of the movement told Daily Maverick that they were not at court for political reasons. 

Said Derek Holmes, the CEO for Move one Million “The reason we are here today is to ensure that whatever decision the ConCourt rules on it is adhered to.”

Members of Move One Million hold up a banner reading ‘Corruption must fall, lock them up’ as they protest outside the Constitutional Court. Photo / Shiraaz Mohamed.

He said the movement did not believe that in a constitutional democracy any one person could be above the law. He said all the organisation wanted to see was people treated equally in the country. 

Asked if the movement’s attendance in court hinged on favouring a particular decision, Holmes said: “We don’t have a favourite, the legal system is in place for who does what and how”.

He added the movement had faith in the South African legal system.

Lindi Nkosi a member of the Radical Economic Transformation group said the country’s constitution was being abused. She said her attendance was motivated by such abuse.

“We are busy fighting and protecting others while other members of the same party were being crucified. When I say others, I mean president Zuma. Follow the examples as they flow out from the commission,” she said.

Nkosi said she was openly a part of the RET group and her main concern was that if Zuma is put to trial, all ANC members accused of wrongdoing should follow suit.

Added Nkosi, “No one will arrest Zuma because they would have to arrest the throngs of his supporters with him”.

Apart from the ANC and OSAM, members of the newly-formed Action SA party were also in attendance. A female member of the party defied the rain and focussed on carrying printing letters on a plain cardboard box against the wall of the ConCourt. She wrote in large capital letters: “YOU STOLE THE COUNTRY TO BANKRUPTCY.”

A member of Action SA holds up a placard reading ‘Zuma afraid for jail but ordinary get jailed’ as they protest outside the Constitutional Court. Photo / Shiraaz Mohamed.

Pretty Ntshele, 48, from Yeoville, who supports the former Johannesburg mayor Herman Mashaba’s campaign said she wanted to express her worry for the general well-being of South Africans. She said while she was against the court defiance by Zuma, she was especially concerned about important matters such as gender-based violence (GBV), crime, education and others that the ruling party seemed to have neglected.

“If Zuma has to answer, he must answer because all this is his and the ANC’s doing,” said Ntshele.

But Nkosi vowed to defend Zuma. “We will fight, no one will get on Zuma’s head and expect us to keep quiet. The RET is the ANC’s policy, none of us are out of line. It’s the media that wants South Africa to believe this.”

Said Nkosi “We will die where president Zuma dies”. DM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 9

  • How is it possible that any *thinking* and *reasonably informed* individual can support Zuma with anything like the zeal and fervour displayed here?

    Oh wait, I think I’ve just answered my own question…

  • Why give any airtime or chapter and verse to these delinquents and brain-dead halfwits? Nothing but a rabble, who aren’t remotely important and deserve no publicity at all. Call their bluff on the threats and intimidation, SA must move on and see that justice and accountability is served.

  • Ai yai yai carl. Basically saying that if someone supported clearly defies the law and is appropriately held accountable then there will be a tsunami tantrum. So now we eventually get the essence of exactly what JZ wants us to know in this game of chicken. Use of fear to achieve a political goal.

  • “if Zuma is put to trial, all ANC members accused of wrongdoing should follow suit”

    Yes Lindi Nkosi, that’s what law and order is all about. Anyone accused of a crime, or wrongdoing as you like to put it, will be charged and have the opportunity to defend her/himself. Zuma failed to do this.

  • “The rule of law is important to us and president Zuma does not want to undermine the rule of law.”

    But Mr Niehaus, Zuma IS undermining the rule of law.

    “Such a judgement would lead to outrage and anger amongst us supporters”

    Are you threatening insurrection from your followers Mr Niehaus?

  • All of this merely begs the question – why has Niehaus not yet been arrested too? How can a country be held to ransom by a few half-wits motivated purely by self-interest?

  • Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted