BUSINESS MAVERICK

Treasury defends below-inflation social grant increases after accusations of ‘anti-poor’ Budget

By Ray Mahlaka 4 March 2021

Senior citizens queue for their monthly social grants outside Jabulani Mall in Soweto. (Photo: Gallo Images / ER Lombard)

SA’s extensive social grant system, with 18 million beneficiaries, has become a big line-item in the government expenditure programme. Treasury says slower growth in social grants is needed to cut government expenditure by R300-billion over the next three years.

Ray Mahlaka

National Treasury officials have defended their decision to not increase social grants in line with inflation for the first time in more than a decade, saying it is necessary to bring prudence into public finances by cutting ballooning expenditure.

Treasury has been attacked by social justice activists and academics, who say it has increased hardship among South Africa’s poorest and most vulnerable households by not increasing social grants for 2021 in line with inflation. 

The child grant will increase by 3.4% to R460 a month and the foster care grant will rise by 1% to R1,050 a month. Other monthly grants increase by 1.6%, including payouts to the aged (R1,890), those over 75 years (R1,910), the disabled (R1,890), war veterans (R1,910) and dependents taking care of children with mental or physical disabilities (R1,890).

The lower increases will have the effect of cutting total expenditure on social grants by R5.8-billion in 2021/22, R10.7-billion in 2022/23 and R19.5-billion in 2023/24.

In a discussion call with investors hosted by Nedbank and Citi on Thursday, Treasury deputy director-general for public finances Mampho Modise defended the government’s unpopular decision on grants.

“It was not a strategy to disadvantage the poor by increasing social grants by less than inflation. It was more of balancing the need for fiscal consolidation, boosting economic growth and protecting [government spending] infrastructure,” she said. 

Modise added that spending on the country’s 18 million beneficiaries had ballooned over the years to become a big line-item in government expenditure.  

When the government announced in October 2020 a plan to cut expenditure by more than R300-billion over the next three years, Modise said Treasury had to target social grants in addition to the public sector wage bill.  She said social grants had been insulated from cuts since Treasury embarked on a fiscal consolidation path in 2012. 

“Since we started with fiscal consolidation, we tried, by all means, to protect Social Development [the department that pays social grants] even when we had to find the money for fee-free higher education in 2017. We protected social development. But because of the quantum of what we had to look at [in terms of cutting government expenditure], it was very difficult to not look at slowing down the pace of growth in social development.” 

Modise was more diplomatic than Finance Minister Tito Mboweni when he responded to criticism that Treasury had proposed an “anti-poor” Budget. “There is no social contract that says every year there must be ‘X’ amount of increase. The allocations made were what we can afford,” Mboweni said at a press conference after presenting the Budget to Parliament. 

Mboweni Budget under fire 

Criticism of the Budget has come in thick and fast.

According to Business Day, Michael Sachs, acting chair of the Financial and Fiscal Commission, which advises the government on its expenditure framework, said in Parliament that the Budget might be inconsistent with the Constitution’s Bill of Rights. This was because cuts in social grants and health allocations (with spending cuts of over R3-billion over the next three years) might undermine basic human rights, such as access to health and state support through social grants.

Civil society group the Black Sash said the Budget “failed to address the escalating humanitarian crisis that currently threatens the livelihoods of millions of vulnerable people”. 

Other social relief 

Treasury’s Modise said lower-than-usual social grant increases were necessary to fund social relief programmes launched by the government during the Covid-19 pandemic, including the R350-a-month grant. That payout, which costs the government R2.1-billion a month, was introduced in May 2020 to provide relief to individuals above the age of 18 who are unemployed and do not receive any income or any other social grant. 

Curtailed social grants will also fund President Cyril Ramaphosa’s public employment initiative, which has promised to put 700,000 people into temporary jobs over six months as part of Covid-19 relief measures.  Treasury has allocated R11-billion for the initiative.

“We are hoping that people benefiting from grants will be absorbed into the initiative [and get employment opportunities],” said Modise, adding that fewer people will then depend on social grants. 

“We are looking at a period when things are tough and we have to make tough decisions. When things get better, one would consider proposals of social grants [increasing]. But, for now, we are better off as a country consolidating and making sure we protect social development.” DM/BM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 1

  • Talk about playing right into Mr Malemas hands – sadly the ANC has made a rod for its own back with this grants system. In my opinion,this money would be better spent on education and birth control. “Give a man a fish and he eats for the day, teach him how to fish and he eats for ever!”

  • Business Maverick

    Distell flags booze ban losses and R100-million unrest hit 

    By Mfuneko Toyana

    Female-named hurricanes kill more people on average than male hurricanes. This is due to people not being as intimidated by the former as the latter.