South Africa

GROUNDUP

Home Affairs considers scrapping male and female ID numbers

Home Affairs considers scrapping male and female ID numbers
ID numbers may not contain the numbers which signify whether the holder is male or female in future. (Photo: Supplied)

Gender activists welcome draft new identity management policy, with some reservations.

First published in GroundUp.

Gender activists have welcomed a move by the Department of Home Affairs (DHA) to take into account the wishes of transgender, non-binary and intersex people in allocating identity numbers.

The DHA has published a draft of its new official identity management policy, which is open for public comment until 28 February.

According to the draft, the DHA aims to introduce a National Identity System (NIS), in order to guard against identity theft and to digitise identity management. All information about the identity of citizens and non-citizens in South Africa will be stored on the NIS. Included in the draft policy are options for ID numbers to take into account transgender, non-binary and intersex people.

Currently, the seventh digit in South African ID numbers identifies a person’s sex. A seventh digit between 0 and 4 “means the holder of the ID is a female,” while a seventh digit between 5 and 9 “means the holder of the ID is a male”.

New options include randomised ID numbers and the introduction of an additional third category for intersex people.

Gender activists have welcomed the DHA’s acknowledgement in the draft policy that the existing system excludes transgender, non-binary and intersex people.

Iranti programmes specialist Sibusiso Kheswa, said: “The possibility of randomised ID numbers, where gender is not coded, means everyone can have a neutral ID number without having to worry about being outed”. (Outing refers to the revelation of a person’s gender identity or sexual orientation, without their consent.)

Gender DynamiX (GDX), an organisation advancing transgender human rights, is also in favour of randomised identity numbers.

“GDX is in full support of the recommendation to have randomised ID numbers — meaning that no data would be encoded into the ID number, including date of birth, gender or citizenship. This would be a critical aspect in our recommendations to the DHA. Random numbers protect the individual’s personal information and can remain with the person for life, irrespective of whether or not their particulars change over time,” said Zoey Black, legal and education advocacy officer at GDX.

A third category proposed

Both Iranti and GDX disagree with some aspects of the draft policy which includes a new X category in addition to male and female for completing the sex field on various official documents.

Iranti is in discussions with the DHA to clarify some misleading language, said Kheswa. “In the policy, there is mention of a third sex and sexual orientation … We are talking about gender. We are not advocating for a third sex, we are advocating for a third sex category which may be represented by an X. That X means unspecified gender,” he said.

The third sex category is important for the inclusion and self-determination of intersex people, said Kheswa.

“When a baby is born with varying sex characteristics or ambiguous genitalia, doctors often rush to operate and ‘fix’ a particular gender on the child. Globally, the intersex community has rejected these surgeries. When we have Home Affairs legally recognising intersex people, then parents and doctors will leave the child to grow and identify themselves,” he said.

While the draft policy suggested that the X would be used for transgender, non-binary and intersex people, Kheswa said all people should be able to choose the unspecified gender option.

GDX does not support the allocation of an X solely for non-binary, transgender and intersex persons, said Black.

“Trans and gender diverse persons already face extraordinary marginalisation and discrimination, even from officials at the DHA. The creation of an ‘X’ would further perpetuate, if not worsen, the already dire position of trans persons and communities and place them at even greater risk for discrimination and violence,” she said. DM

 

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Johan Buys says:

    Do we not have more pressing priorities? Maybe : pit latrines at schools for a start!

    • Kanu Sukha says:

      It is not a case of one or the other, when both are important methinks. After all … there are many persons employed to look after or into the respective challenges.

  • Kb1066 . says:

    The article makes it sound simple, but means changing all ID numbers, issuing new ID cards, and the all the policies, contracts, loans, passports will need to be updated, even birth, marriage certificates, vehicle licenses have your ID on it. Home affairs cannot keep up with the current demand, how are they going to cope with reissuing for the entire population. I smell big tenders in the future

  • Sydney Kaye says:

    High priority and probably needing a consultant to design. You have to remember that no policy initiative is launched unless it has the potential to enrich a cadre or the party.

  • David FC says:

    ID numbers need to be randomised in the spirit of the constitution and the POPI act. Agesim might seem like a joke to many but in truth it’s it unfairy limits job opportunities as you get older. If ID numbers were randomised then people could use it to apply for jobs using it and no other personal information preventing candidates from being screened out based on their age, sex,vrace etc. No need to make a big deal of it, from tomorrow new borns could get the new randomised ID and if old folk want to anonymise their ID they could apply to have it changed – no need for big bang. Various consumers of ID numbers would however have to look at their systems because many of them validate IDs based on the built in hash total and birth date, sex etc.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

X

This article is free to read.

Sign up for free or sign in to continue reading.

Unlike our competitors, we don’t force you to pay to read the news but we do need your email address to make your experience better.


Nearly there! Create a password to finish signing up with us:

Please enter your password or get a sign in link if you’ve forgotten

Open Sesame! Thanks for signing up.

We would like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick...

…but we are not going to force you to. Over 10 million users come to us each month for the news. We have not put it behind a paywall because the truth should not be a luxury.

Instead we ask our readers who can afford to contribute, even a small amount each month, to do so.

If you appreciate it and want to see us keep going then please consider contributing whatever you can.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

Daily Maverick Elections Toolbox

Feeling powerless in politics?

Equip yourself with the tools you need for an informed decision this election. Get the Elections Toolbox with shareable party manifesto guide.