South Africa


Home Affairs considers scrapping male and female ID numbers

ID numbers may not contain the numbers which signify whether the holder is male or female in future. (Photo: Supplied)

Gender activists welcome draft new identity management policy, with some reservations.

First published in GroundUp.

Gender activists have welcomed a move by the Department of Home Affairs (DHA) to take into account the wishes of transgender, non-binary and intersex people in allocating identity numbers.

The DHA has published a draft of its new official identity management policy, which is open for public comment until 28 February.

According to the draft, the DHA aims to introduce a National Identity System (NIS), in order to guard against identity theft and to digitise identity management. All information about the identity of citizens and non-citizens in South Africa will be stored on the NIS. Included in the draft policy are options for ID numbers to take into account transgender, non-binary and intersex people.

Currently, the seventh digit in South African ID numbers identifies a person’s sex. A seventh digit between 0 and 4 “means the holder of the ID is a female,” while a seventh digit between 5 and 9 “means the holder of the ID is a male”.

New options include randomised ID numbers and the introduction of an additional third category for intersex people.

Gender activists have welcomed the DHA’s acknowledgement in the draft policy that the existing system excludes transgender, non-binary and intersex people.

Iranti programmes specialist Sibusiso Kheswa, said: “The possibility of randomised ID numbers, where gender is not coded, means everyone can have a neutral ID number without having to worry about being outed”. (Outing refers to the revelation of a person’s gender identity or sexual orientation, without their consent.)

Gender DynamiX (GDX), an organisation advancing transgender human rights, is also in favour of randomised identity numbers.

“GDX is in full support of the recommendation to have randomised ID numbers — meaning that no data would be encoded into the ID number, including date of birth, gender or citizenship. This would be a critical aspect in our recommendations to the DHA. Random numbers protect the individual’s personal information and can remain with the person for life, irrespective of whether or not their particulars change over time,” said Zoey Black, legal and education advocacy officer at GDX.

A third category proposed

Both Iranti and GDX disagree with some aspects of the draft policy which includes a new X category in addition to male and female for completing the sex field on various official documents.

Iranti is in discussions with the DHA to clarify some misleading language, said Kheswa. “In the policy, there is mention of a third sex and sexual orientation … We are talking about gender. We are not advocating for a third sex, we are advocating for a third sex category which may be represented by an X. That X means unspecified gender,” he said.

The third sex category is important for the inclusion and self-determination of intersex people, said Kheswa.

“When a baby is born with varying sex characteristics or ambiguous genitalia, doctors often rush to operate and ‘fix’ a particular gender on the child. Globally, the intersex community has rejected these surgeries. When we have Home Affairs legally recognising intersex people, then parents and doctors will leave the child to grow and identify themselves,” he said.

While the draft policy suggested that the X would be used for transgender, non-binary and intersex people, Kheswa said all people should be able to choose the unspecified gender option.

GDX does not support the allocation of an X solely for non-binary, transgender and intersex persons, said Black.

“Trans and gender diverse persons already face extraordinary marginalisation and discrimination, even from officials at the DHA. The creation of an ‘X’ would further perpetuate, if not worsen, the already dire position of trans persons and communities and place them at even greater risk for discrimination and violence,” she said. DM



Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 5

    • It is not a case of one or the other, when both are important methinks. After all … there are many persons employed to look after or into the respective challenges.

  • The article makes it sound simple, but means changing all ID numbers, issuing new ID cards, and the all the policies, contracts, loans, passports will need to be updated, even birth, marriage certificates, vehicle licenses have your ID on it. Home affairs cannot keep up with the current demand, how are they going to cope with reissuing for the entire population. I smell big tenders in the future

  • High priority and probably needing a consultant to design. You have to remember that no policy initiative is launched unless it has the potential to enrich a cadre or the party.

  • ID numbers need to be randomised in the spirit of the constitution and the POPI act. Agesim might seem like a joke to many but in truth it’s it unfairy limits job opportunities as you get older. If ID numbers were randomised then people could use it to apply for jobs using it and no other personal information preventing candidates from being screened out based on their age, sex,vrace etc. No need to make a big deal of it, from tomorrow new borns could get the new randomised ID and if old folk want to anonymise their ID they could apply to have it changed – no need for big bang. Various consumers of ID numbers would however have to look at their systems because many of them validate IDs based on the built in hash total and birth date, sex etc.

  • Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted