X

This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

The news sucks. But your reading experience doesn't have to. Help us improve that for you by registering for free.



Please create a password or click to receive a login link.


Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten


Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

First Thing, Daily Maverick's flagship newsletter

Join the 230 000 South Africans who read First Thing newsletter.

We'd like our readers to start paying for Daily Maverick

More specifically, we'd like those who can afford to pay to start paying. What it comes down to is whether or not you value Daily Maverick. Think of us in terms of your daily cappuccino from your favourite coffee shop. It costs around R35. That’s R1,050 per month on frothy milk. Don’t get us wrong, we’re almost exclusively fuelled by coffee. BUT maybe R200 of that R1,050 could go to the journalism that’s fighting for the country?

We don’t dictate how much we’d like our readers to contribute. After all, how much you value our work is subjective (and frankly, every amount helps). At R200, you get it back in Uber Eats and ride vouchers every month, but that’s just a suggestion. A little less than a week’s worth of cappuccinos.

We can't survive on hope and our own determination. Our country is going to be considerably worse off if we don’t have a strong, sustainable news media. If you’re rejigging your budgets, and it comes to choosing between frothy milk and Daily Maverick, we hope you might reconsider that cappuccino.

We need your help. And we’re not ashamed to ask for it.

Our mission is to Defend Truth. Join Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

SA Breweries takes to Twitter in its tip for Tito: Plea...

Business Maverick

BUSINESS MAVERICK

SA Breweries takes to Twitter in its tip for Tito: Please tax beer responsibly

SAB has put the loss of revenue to the sector as a whole at more than R30-billion and it cancelled R5-billion in planned investments. (Photo: Waldo Swiegers / Bloomberg via Getty Images)

South African Breweries has made the plea on its Twitter feed. We’ll know on 24 February if the finance minister has listened.

“Dear Minister, the beer value chain supports 22,300 jobs in the agricultural sector,” SAB says on its Twitter handle @SABreweries. “SAB buys from more than 1,000 farmers locally, the majority are emerging black female farmers. When you #TaxBeerResponsibly it supports jobs in rural communities #TipsForMoF #ResponsibleTogether.”

Embedded in the Tweet appears this message: “Dear Minister, the excise increase impacts the recovery of our farmers. Please tax beer responsibly…” That’s a play on SAB’s slogan of “enjoy responsibly”. Booze producers are a bit like Eskom in this regard, encouraging their customers not to consume too much of their product.

The sector has been reeling from three bans on alcohol sales, a blunt instrument that was wielded to prevent trauma units from being overwhelmed simultaneously with Covid-19 patients and battered boozers, or those battered by boozers. 

SAB has put the loss of revenue to the sector as a whole at more than R30-billion and it cancelled R5-billion in planned investments. Brewer Heineken cut 70 jobs and put a freeze on planned investments. President Cyril Ramaphosa has made attracting investment a centrepiece of his economic agenda, and so that hurts.

In another tweet, SAB says:

“With the 3rd alcohol ban behind us, we’re challenged with stabilising the beer value chain. Leading up to the 24 Feb budget speech, we have #TipsForMoF to #TaxBeerResponsibly, any excise tax increase will affect the sustainability of the industry and economy #ResponsibleTogether.”

It has become an annual ritual in South Africa for interested parties and ordinary people to submit tips for the finance minister ahead of the Budget speech, which Tito Mboweni will deliver on 24 February. The SAB campaign can perhaps be seen as tips from the provider of tipplers. But its appeal rests in part on the impact on emerging black female farmers, a group the ANC is at pains to champion. That’s a clever campaign.

Mboweni has lots on his plate as he picks through his pilchards, perhaps while inspecting the dagga plants that seem to mysteriously sprout on his Limpopo farm. Sin taxes are always an easy target, and they typically get increased each February, with the recent exception of traditional beer — which also says something about the politics of the matter.

The issue now is far more high-profile than it has ever been. The pandemic and the lockdowns to contain it have staggered the economy, and SARS is estimated to have lost more than R300-billion in income, as a result, this financial year. It desperately needs additional revenue and the government wants to curb alcohol use and the consumption of tobacco, which was also banned in 2020 as South Africa’s dysfunctional state attempted to assume a nanny role.

It is not always clear that tax increases yield the intended results on this front, and as a regressive tax, poorer households will bear the burden. It can also trigger demand for untaxed or illicit products – just look at the tobacco industry. Still, a tax increase would be preferable to another round of prohibition, and politically it might be a trade-off to keep the ANC’s socially conservative wing from imposing another ban.

And while SAB has obvious reasons for being opposed to a tax increase on its products, the sector, as it points out, is recovering from its enforced dry-out. South Africa will have a continuing debate about the social and health consequences of its ongoing love affair with the bottle.

There are critics who contend that its negative effects ultimately detract from GDP rather than adding to it. But the fact remains that it does make an economic contribution and the bans may have cost more than 100,000 jobs and billions of rands in investment, which is the lifeblood of any economy. 

Hitting the industry’s products with a big tax increase at the moment may cost more jobs and investment, which could also take away from state coffers. It’s a balancing act — and one that wobbles like a sailor on a bender. DM/BM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 8

    • A temperance league whine is never an attractive thing. Boringly predictable on the social impact of alcohol and drugs, and for some reason temperance league members believe taxation of tobacco and alcohol will drive down consumption. Intoxicating substance abuse has been on mankind’s agenda ever since the first homo erectus ate a magic mushroom. You can criminalise it, tax it, stomp on it, smash up the stills, cry and beat your chest, it won’t stop. Whatever action you take to suppress demand will simply drive consumption and production underground – and as we all know, underground means a loss of control, a reduction in formal sector employment and the potential criminalisation of many otherwise good folk. You only have to observe the social fall-out from the bans on the now illicit drugs industry worldwide. If you want to really understand how alcohol taxation and restricted consumption laws are socially ineffective at best and indeed even counter-productive, have a comparative look at the Brits on the one hand and the Italians and French on the other.

      • Totally agree. History teaches us that banning substances only results in black markets and criminal activity. In general, heavy-handed government regulation results only in resistance. Where the emphasis is on education and supporting people who are abusing substances to stop, the results are much, much better. Portugal is a good example of this.

      • Well said….any form of prohibition, whether hard (bans) or soft (sin tax) has never worked. Education and social upliftment works far better.

  • Before the beer industry and the rest of the liquor industry can ask government to act responsibly (reduce tax) there needs to be some responsible steps taken by the beer and liquor industry. The whole marketing strategy of those industries is designed to encourage irresponsible and excessive consumption. The industry benefits massively from irresponsible and excessive consumption. A responsible move by the beer and liquor industry would be to offer to accept a legislated ban on the advertising of alcohol anywhere other inside licensed premises and to accept a limit on trading hours for off-sales to 6pm on week days, 12 pm on Saturdays and complete closure on Sundays. LETS ALLSUBSCRIBE TO RESPONSIBLE BEHAVIOUR. Donald Moore.

  • I would suggest taxing alcohol rather than beer. E.g. make 5% alcohol beer MUCH more expensive than 2.5% alcohol beer by taxing it hard. People will have similar amounts of money, drink similar amounts of beer but consume less alcohol and become far less drunk. Similarly, hit spirits hard. #taxalcoholnotdrinks

  • I would like to recommend a very steep tax on all alcohol and ring-fence the returns for better mental health facilities all around South Africa. Mental Health is strongly linked to abuse of alcohol.

    GMP.

  • “SAB has put the loss of revenue to the sector as a whole at more than R30-billion and it cancelled R5-billion in planned investments.”
    Just a R30billion hole not getting taxed . How many hospital beds was that ?
    Push up the price of any item , one tends to consume less . See Escom !
    You can go solar or the ‘non – white ‘ market .
    As a ‘non- black ‘ can I make ‘Traditional Beer” for myself ?
    Does no one recall the law of diminishing returns ?
    Taxed to death springs to mind 🙂
    So there will be higher taxes on alcohol , regardless of the downstream effects .
    A few extra thousands on UIF , for a few months in the future ! Then zip !
    If you drink until you go blind or injure yourself , your problem , your choice , take your place at the back of the hospital queue.
    Fry your brain on coke , meth , whatever , your choice ! Get to the back of the line !
    All taxes will increase , the loss in revenue for lower alcohol sales cannot be recovered in a few months !
    Income tax ? More work for accountants 🙂
    What we might see in the budget is cutbacks on Govt. spending !
    Except on itself !
    Cabinet and below with take a 10% pay cut for the year , in small sympathy to the masses it has stolen from !

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted