South Africa

NEWSFLASH

Final order: ConCourt rules Jacob Zuma must appear and answer questions at Zondo Commission

Former president Jacob Zuma, left, and Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo. (Illustrative image sources: 2019 Tiso Blackstar Group / Thulani Mbele | Financial Mail / Freddy Mavunda)

The Constitutional Court has ordered the former president to comply with State Capture Commission summonses and answer questions unless he can prove they would be self-incriminating.

Former president Jacob Zuma must comply with directives and summonses issued by the State Capture Commission and appear to answer to the serious allegations against him, the Constitutional Court ruled on Thursday.

Handing down the order, Justice Chris Jafta said: “Mr Jacob Gedleyihlekisa Zuma is directed to appear and give evidence before the commission on dates determined by it.”

He said Zuma does not have a right to remain silent in front of commission chairperson, Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo.

“This right is available to arrested and accused persons and not to witnesses.”

Zuma, however, is entitled to privileges under the Commissions Act that give witnesses the right to not incriminate themselves. Witnesses cannot be compelled to answer a question that will expose them to a criminal charge, but they must provide sufficient grounds to claim that right.

The commission approached the Constitutional Court in December 2020 after Zuma left proceedings without permission in November when Zondo denied his application for the chairperson to recuse himself.

Zuma did not oppose the court application and was ordered to pay the commission’s legal costs.

Reading the brief judgment, Jafta was critical of the commission for failing to use its powers and getting itself into a situation where it needed to approach the country’s highest court to force Zuma to attend, almost three years after it began its work.

The commission argued that it should be granted direct access to the court rather than going through the high court and potentially the Supreme Court of Appeals because that drawn-out process would only be resolved after its deadline had expired.

“Quite clearly, the commission is to blame for the situation it found itself in,” said Jafta.

The commission had issued 2,526 summonses to witnesses but appeared to treat Zuma with kid gloves.

While Zondo had tried to get Zuma to appear before the commission from its inception, in December 2019 he issued a notice to authorise the commission’s secretary to issue Zuma a summons, despite the secretary already having the power to do so.

“Needless to say, this was completely unnecessary,” said Jafta.

“Having chosen this route, which was opposed by the former president, the commission failed to take steps timeously to ripen that application for hearing.”

The commission could have issued Zuma a summons much earlier, as it did with other witnesses.

“No reason was furnished for this favourable treatment to the former president. The commission was alive to the fact that the Constitution demands equal treatment of witnesses under the law. Had the commission involved its powers of compulsion quite early, the circumstances of urgency would not have arisen here,” Jafta continued.

The Constitutional Court decided to grant the commission direct access due to the nature of the allegations, which include Zuma surrendering his constitutional powers to private individuals.

“The allegations investigated are so serious that, if established, a huge threat to this country’s fledgling democracy would have occurred,” said Jafta.

“It is in the interest of all South Africans, the former president included, that these allegations be put to rest once and for all.”

Noting the irony that it was Zuma who established the State Capture Commission, Jafta criticised the former president for failing to comply with its directives and summonses, which are provided for under the Constitution.

“The former president’s conduct is a direct breach of the rule of law which forms part of that Constitution. In our system, no one is above the law. Even those who had the privilege of making laws are bound to respect and comply with those laws. For as long as they are in operation laws must be obeyed.”

Zuma’s lawyers have argued he is not required to appear before the commission while his high court application to overturn Zondo’s recusal decision is pending.

The most recent summonses issued to Zuma required him to appear at the commission from 18 to 22 January and from 15 to 19 February 2020. DM

 

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 13

  • And the band played on… I wonder what Zuma’s next move will be, I guess he’s looking forward to having his day in court at last and as he has said so often.. Is that a stirring in the MKMVA’s ranks I hear in the background.. or perhaps they are too busy blaming foreigners for the state of our country?
    And Zondo was (probably over) cautious in his handling of Zuma which I understand, so now the constitutional court has effectively stated that he was NOT treated unfairly.. Your move JZ..

    • His next move… (aka Trump) it is a hoax … obviously… and the media reporting it… fake ! There were some 74 million or so Americans who swallowed that !

  • Knowing this man, he is bound to come up with something else….herewith some possibilities:
    1. He is sick….again
    2. He is temporarily deaf in two ears.
    3. He has to attend about 5 funerals at his next scheduled appearance appearance
    4. He will change his legal team shortly beforehand
    5. His dog is sick
    6. MKMVK bus from Durban broke down
    7. He has not got money to travel to JHB. His money from the SSA has not yet arrived for this month
    8. His Mercedes Benz limousine has broken down, and the Bentley is in for a service
    9. His lawyer is sick
    10. One of his ….(?) wives is sick

  • Let’s hope that finally this obnoxious scumbag and his equally obnoxiously legal team have finally run out of duck n dive options. Somehow I doubt it.

  • Exactly who will be paying the Commissioner’s costs? J Gedlehlakisa Zuma, or some funding other than his own personal fund?
    It is flabbergasting to read of Dep-Chief Justice Zondo’s so regular “amazement” at the profligate figures of monies gone AWOL. He is intelligent, and can read and write. Has he never opened but ONE Daily Maverick daily over the past 7 or 8 years? I have downloaded perhaps 300 of these essays, opinionistas, reports, assessments, records – call them what you will – written of the incredible pursuits of the contributing journalists, inter alia. I call on these readily when sucked into contentious conversation.
    What an important contribution by Branko and His Bunch! a luta continua

  • he has made a joke of the SA legal system. he does not want and never wanted “his day in court”. he knows that under oath he cannot say a word. once he is accused and no longer bound by oath (not that it means anything to him but can perjure himself) he will either clam up or we are going to hear such frivolous lies mainly involving people who are either dead or nowhere to be found. don’t be so naive to think that this will go down any other way. thats the reality of this country.

    setting aside the very real possibility of a political “deal” in the background that allows CR to save some face by trying these legal options but in essence JZ will never “face the music”. most certainly wont be sentenced ever.

  • Could be that Zondo knew his man better than the rest of us – and the system of justice. What were the chances of this order being denied at an earlier stage, without any dire urgency to it? The hunter certainly has more patience than the prey. And better certainty of getting it than losing it.

  • Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted