Newsdeck

Newsdeck

UK judge rejects extraditing Assange to U.S., citing suicide risk

LONDON, Jan 4 (Reuters) - A British judge ruled on Monday that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange should not be extradited to the United States to face criminal charges including breaking a spying law, saying his mental health problems meant he would be at risk of suicide.

* Judge says extradition would risk Assange suicide

* Assange suffers from severe depression

* U.S. can appeal against the ruling (Adds details, background)

By Michael Holden

 

U.S. authorities accuse Australian-born Assange, 49, of 18 counts relating to the release by WikiLeaks of vast troves of confidential U.S. military records and diplomatic cables which they said had put lives in danger.

His lawyers had argued the entire prosecution was politically motivated, powered by U.S. President Donald Trump, and that Assange’s extradition would pose a severe threat to the work of journalists.

At a hearing at London’s Old Bailey, Judge Vanessa Baraitser rejected nearly all his legal team’s arguments but said she could not approve his extradition as there was a real risk he would commit suicide.

Assange, she said, suffered from at times severe depression and had been diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome and autism, albeit he was “a high functioning autistic case”.

Half a razor blade was found in his London prison cell in May 2019 and he had told medical staff about his suicidal thoughts.

“I find that Mr. Assange’s risk of committing suicide, if an extradition order were to be made, to be substantial,” Baraitser said in her ruling.

“Faced with conditions of near total isolation … I am satisfied that the procedures (outlined by U.S. authorities) will not prevent Mr. Assange from finding a way to commit suicide.”

Lawyers for the U.S. authorities are expected to appeal against the decision.

U.S. prosecutors and Western security officials regard Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, as a reckless and dangerous enemy of the state whose actions put at risk the lives of agents whose names were in the material.

The U.S. authorities say more than 100 people were put at risk by the disclosures and about 50 had received assistance, with some fleeing their home countries with their spouses and families to move to the United States or another safe country.

Supporters regard him as an anti-establishment hero who has been victimised because he exposed U.S. wrongdoing in wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and say his prosecution is a politically motivated assault on journalism and free speech.

Baraitser rejected this, however, saying there was insufficient evidence that prosecutors had been pressured by Trump’s team and there was little evidence of hostility from the U.S. president towards him.

She said there was no evidence that he would not get a fair trial in the United States or that prosecutors were seeking to punish him, and said his actions had gone beyond investigative journalism.

(Reporting by Michael Holden, Editing by Catherine Evans)

Gallery

Comments - Please in order to comment.

  • Kirsty Hämmerle says:

    Great news! Now set him free

  • Darryl van Blerk says:

    Much malfeasance has been revealed by Wikileaks but anyone who has seen the infamous footage showing the massacre of innocent civilians by a US helicopter gunship and heard the casual hate in the voice of the shooter must be appalled at Baraitser’s insouciance. Her judgement is a tacit granting of rights to the military to commit war crimes and simultaneously an attack of the freedom of the press and the public’s right to know. No one in the US army of any rank has been prosecuted for what is so brazenly an horrific war crime but the messenger is made public enemy no.1. It’s always been about demeaning Assange, making an example of him and closing down Wikileaks. Baraitser has simply presided over a farce which is confirmed in the reasoning around her judgement.

  • Kanu Sukha says:

    The so-called ‘greatest’ power on earth has a long and dark history of being the first country in the world to use atomic/nuclear weapons against another country (Hiroshima and Nagasaki)…and the first one to use chemical weapons against another country (Vietnam) ! Yet… it is falsely proclaimed as the standard-bearer for all things ‘good’ and ‘democratic’. Today ….China (currently the second ‘greatest’ power) is on the brink of taking over that dubious mantle. It has just jailed a reporter… for wait for it …”picking quarrels” and “provoking trouble” regarding reporting on the Covid pandemic ! It seems China has not yet heard of John Lewis’ ‘good trouble’! And yet there are those who steadfastly continue to blindly support or endorse either of these corrupt regimes. What a disgraceful state of humanity and misguided values most of us are descending into.

Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted

A South African Hero: You

There’s a 99.7% chance that this isn’t for you. Only 0.3% of our readers have responded to this call for action.

Those 0.3% of our readers are our hidden heroes, who are fuelling our work and impacting the lives of every South African in doing so. They’re the people who contribute to keep Daily Maverick free for all, including you.

The equation is quite simple: the more members we have, the more reporting and investigations we can do, and the greater the impact on the country.

Be part of that 0.3%. Be a Maverick. Be a Maverick Insider.

Support Daily Maverick→
Payment options

MavericKids vol 3

How can a child learn to read if they don't have a book?

81% of South African children aged 10 can't read for meaning. You can help by pre-ordering a copy of MavericKids.

For every copy sold we will donate a copy to Gift of The Givers for children in need of reading support.