X

This is not a paywall.

Register for free to continue reading.

We made a promise to you that we’ll never erect a paywall and we intend to keep that promise. We also want to continually improve your reading experience and you can help us do that by registering with us. It’s quick, easy and will cost you nothing.



Nearly there! Create a password to finish up registering with us:


Please enter your password or get a login link if you’ve forgotten


Open Sesame! Thanks for registering.

The gloves come off in dispute between SAA and pilots

Business Maverick

BUSINESS MAVERICK

The gloves come off in dispute between SAA and pilots

(Photo: Pxfuel.com)

Negotiations between SAA’s joint business rescue practitioners (BRPs) and the SAA Pilots’ Association have reached an implacable deadlock. On Wednesday, the BRPs issued a 48-hour notice of lockout to the union, with effect from 12 noon on Friday.

In September, SAA’s business rescue practitioners presented the SAA Pilots’ Association (SAAPA) with a set of demands.

These were the new terms and conditions of employment and new salary scales for the 88 pilots who would be retained by SAA following the airline’s restructuring. Some 620 pilots will be retrenched, as per the S189A notice issued in July.

In addition to the new conditions, SAAPA was required to agree to the termination of the Regulating Agreement (RA) that governs the terms and conditions under which SAA’s pilots are employed (and dismissed and retrenched). The union also had to accept the minimum statutory severance pay of one week’s remuneration per completed year of service, as per the Basic Conditions of Employment Act, but substantially less than that stipulated under the RA.

Negotiations stalled, with SAAPA agreeing to some, but not all of the new terms and conditions. As a result, on 30 October SAA referred the dispute to the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA).

Again the parties were unable to reach an agreement and the statutory 30-day period referred to in the Labour Relations Act expired on 30 November.

“The new terms and conditions and salary scales are essential for the new competitive and successful SAA – which will initially require 88 pilots – to become cost-effective and more productive,” the joint BRPs, Siviwe Dongwana and Les Matuson said in a statement.

The new proposed terms include hours of work and rest which are aligned to the Civil Aviation Authority and should give SAA a better chance at being a sustainable airline, once it has completed the business rescue process, they say.

“SAAPA received notification today from SAA, giving the union 48 hours notice of a lockout,” says Grant Back, chair of SAAPA. “SAAPA has offered considerable concessions in negotiations to date.”

The BRPs counter that the Regulating Agreement is a sticking point. It does not comply with the Companies Act, the Public Finance Management Act, nor the supply chain policy of SAA regarding, among others, the procurement process of hotel rooms for pilots, they say.

In addition, as a consequence of seniority provisions, it “indirectly and unfairly discriminates against pilots on grounds of race and gender”.

The lockout means that SAAPA’s members will be excluded from SAA’s workplace with effect from 12 noon on Friday, 18 December until such time that SAAPA accepts the demands made in the lockout letter.

These include:

  • Termination of the RA and all other collective agreements concluded between SAA and SAAPA;
  • Acceptance of the new terms and conditions of employment for pilots;
  • Acceptance of a severance payment of one week per completed year of service; and
  • Acceptance of the new salary scales for captains and first officers, in other words, all pilots.

SAAPA’s members will continue to be excluded and will not be paid in pursuance of this lockout until the terms of this lockout are accepted by SAAPA.

“We have spent a lot of our time negotiating compromises with all of the relevant stakeholders of the airline. The proposed new terms and conditions are fair and competitive for a regional, African airline,” say Matuson and Dongwana. “SAA has among the highest cost bases in terms of pilots’ salaries, meal allowances, leave and sick pay and travel rebate benefits internationally. This cannot continue if the business rescue of SAA is to succeed.”

For its part, SAAPA is seeking legal advice and will continue to act in the best interests of its members. “We stand by our members who have not earned a salary since April 2020,” says Back. DM/BM

Gallery

Comments - share your knowledge and experience

Please note you must be a Maverick Insider to comment. Sign up here or sign in if you are already an Insider.

Everybody has an opinion but not everyone has the knowledge and the experience to contribute meaningfully to a discussion. That’s what we want from our members. Help us learn with your expertise and insights on articles that we publish. We encourage different, respectful viewpoints to further our understanding of the world. View our comments policy here.

All Comments 4

  • SAA should have been liquidated ages ago. Shortly after Jarana was appointed as CEO in Aug 2017, he produced a plan to save SAA with a price tag of R 22 B over 3 years. By now, since then, SAA has cost more than R 40 Billion.
    Please liquidate it ASAP. Those BRPs are just milking it and delaying the inevitable.

  • Quote: “SAA has among the highest cost bases in terms of pilots’ salaries, meal allowances, leave and sick pay and travel rebate benefits internationally.”

    That’s because interntionally, they are one of the best, if not the best group of pilots in the world.

    And SAA cannot, by any stretch of the imagination, be compared with a ‘regional, African airline’.

    You pay African-based mediocre salaries, you get African standards of mediocrity in the pilots, traffic controllers and ground-staff, all resulting in plummeting standards of safety to be followed inevitably with incidents and accidents. All of which, in all probability, would have been avoided if properly trained and experienced people are in the appropriate positions in the organisation

    The entire logic of the business rescue practitioners is fatally flawed. All they can see is the money, not the outstanding safety and the service SAA employees have provided up until now.

    This entire issue highlights the nonsenical argument that government should control and operate so-called SOEs. Government is there to govern, not ru(i)n businesses.

    • Not sure what evidence you have to support that they are the best..
      Even if you do, the fact remains that they have a bailout from the SA taxpayers that is widely believed to be ANOTHER waste of our money.
      The 88 pilots should be grateful that they are being offered a job at all in an economy where many were retrenched, took salary cuts or at very least received no increases for 2020. The world market for pilots has a massive oversupply so they are not negotiating from a position of strength.
      They need to wake up to the reality of their situation and if indeed they can resurrect this dead horse, there may be brighter things in the future for them.
      Cut your cloth…

      • I couldn’t have put it better myself. Time for the 88 SAA pilots to face reality, 620 have been made redundant, also those from Comair, there should be plenty who would take up the offer.

        That being said, I don’t see how SAA can be resurrected, far better to franchise the brand.

  • Please peer review 3 community comments before your comment can be posted